Yo,
VT3, not to sound as if I'm challenging your position, but I can't think of a less incriminating way to phrase my question so I apologize; your confidence and challenge, if more then a small dog yapping loudly (again, I could not think of a more polite way to state this; I don't know you and am far underqualified to make criticism or judgement on you.), would insinuate that you are an extremely talented fighter. You also claim to know the 'real' system, which leads me to ask you to perhaps answer the question as to why the traditional, unchanged system is so very key. I know, it's well rounded, but to play apon the metaphore of the rabbit and the squirrel (I'm sure every one here has heard, and likely told, the metaphore) sometimes you're not being chased by a fox, sometimes you're being chased by owls or wolves. Not to be lost in metaphoric excess, the problem was that the squirrel had to think; easier said then done, and I am by no means at this point, but isn't it supposed to just flow? So, isn't it best to know as many 'good' techniques and variations thereof as possible?
You seem to base a large amount of your claim on knowing one true system, and are willing to lay stakes on that claim, so I thought you could answer. The series of questions without a question are to show where the confusion lies.
Sorry to continue begging the question. It must be vexatious to deal with beginners and 'newbies.' Thanks for your time, as always.
|