Thread: Real Kung Fu
View Single Post
Old 10-28-2004, 12:58 AM   #4 (permalink)
Oraenor
Premiere Member
 
Oraenor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oz/Down Under (aka Hell)
Posts: 543
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oraenor will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to Oraenor
Default

1. Is it that the stances cannot or are not useful in combat?

The question is how the teacher teaches it. I have been taught that the stances are used only in striking and thus when ever a strike is made, the stance is immediately employed. There is a trade off between mobility and stability with the stances and one must know when it's good for one or the other.



2. The circular nature of stikes are not as effective as linear strikes, due to the lack of power behind each strike?(Less hip movement)

look at the boxers hook and uppercut, both are circular. circular and linear are neither good nor bad, both have their uses.






3. Strikes take too much time to execute, due to their nature?(i.e. Reverse Punce from the hip in comparion with a Jab from the shoulder)
I dont know what your comparing this to, look at WC's knuckle chain punches compared to let say a boxer's J-J-C combo
__________________
America's solution to birth control- "Lets start a war!"
Oraenor is offline   Reply With Quote