Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StknDecuerdas
Thank you sir for replying in such detail. So what Is your opinion on spanish cut/thrust and rapier fighting? Can they be effective against the FMA's in thier own right? The spanish were known for their sword skills back to the romans.
|
It would depend on WHO are wielding the swords.
Anyone who has sword skills would be dangerous in their own right.
If one brought a Musashi to fight someone who was not on the same skill level as he, then he might be able to defeat BOTH sides using his katana.
That is not to say that his Japanese system is better, but the warrior wielding the sword is quite good.
I would recommend anyone seeking a bg in Spanish sword skills to seek out instructors like Maestro Martinez and others.
In the matters of war; equality and duelling skills are not the main focus, but overwhelming arms/forces, and forcing the environment to favor your side. In the case of the Conquesta by Spain, they knew that to divide and conquer (a tactic learned FROM the Romans as well) is the most effective 'weapon' in this particular goal.
Firepower was as well:
On January 6, 1622:
"... the Spanish MUSKETS turned out to be as effective as ever, the rebels (Moros) withdrew to the fortified enclosure which they had built". Page 315 Jesuits in the Philippines
As for the Spanish being known for their sword skills back into the romans:
I'm positive there were excellent Spanish swordsmen. In the days of Spain's own conquerors - the Moors, the Visigoths and the Romans all had their share of excellent swordsmen. One can't simply say that the Moors, Visigoths and Romans had better sword skills than the Spanish just because they ruled over Spain for hundreds of years. War needs MUCH more than swordsmanship to sway the tide to one's side - each one of these victors had different circumstances and methods which 'won' over Spain.
--Rafael--