Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EmptyneSs if u think that royler or any other bjj practitioner would act the same way in a real self defense situation outside the ring, then u are mistaken. u seem to assume that people who partake in "sport martial arts" cannot make the distinction between competitions and real life situations. u also for some reason seem to think that sport martial artists are going to adhere to competition rules when they are put in a real self defense situation outside of the ring or dojo. to dismiss the value of an entire art based on a mma match u saw on tv is narrow minded if u ask me. |
I figured someone was gonna say that
.....So reality combat sports arent huh? i thought you guys all touted how it had proved to be effective for self defense by evidence of your ring fights...if ring fights are using non reality based technique that completly removes any relevance to the street.
But even so explain how that was supposed to work in the ring then? Was the idea to guilt Sak into laying down in his guard?
What evolution in the ring made this into a technique? it was a MAJOR part of Roylers game plan...
Next explain this....
If he cant effectively fight in the ring, how is he suddenly capable of striking and takedowns on the street? or are they counting on an unskilled opponent in the street that will allow their poor standup and takedown skills to suffice until the butt flopping becomes effective once the opponent is tired?