Originally Posted by Mike Brewer

Hatton had listened to six weeks of Mayweather yammering at press conferences.

Hatton had heard Floyd talking smack, dancing around, instigating, and basically acting like a child in front of cameras for a solid month and a half.

Hatton was in front of a Manchester, England audience - the people who comprise the largest and most rabid portion of his fan base.

Hatton stood still behind a podium during his speech, and didn't run over to Floyd, didn't dance around, didn't wear a smug or insulting T-Shirt. He talked about Floyd the way a parent talks about a misbehaving child.

I thought it showed a lot of class, and was ENTIRELY appropriate for the venue. It played well to the British audience, he stayed composed and didn't yell, and there was no pushing or pre-fight swinging like you see in the States so often.

Yes, Medic. I think he seems like a class act.

Now, back to the real question. Why did you feel a need to make that an issue? Is it because you can't see past your hatred of me and my opinions enough to pick an argument about something worthwhile? Am I supposed to really believe that you question Ricky Hatton's class because he said the F word two or three times in a press conference? I'm supposed to look at that and believe that you weren't just taking a cheap shot because my opinion differs from yours?

And as for the Osama comment, yes, it did go too far, and your "retraction" is a piece of shit. You can't even apologize without tying to make it look like someone else's fault? In the time I've been posting here, and given my history, what part of your little "Mike would like the king of all terrorists if he said something bad about FLoyd" comment did you think I'd find funny? Try again, asshole.