Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Brewer
....
A.) What I think of the value of militaries training against and with sword-type weapons, and
B.) Whether or not I think training in a sword art would equip a person to defend against strikes with sticks.
To the first part, I think the value for militaries is distinctly different than the value for civilians. Militaries carry that kind of gear as a part of their regularly issued kit, so it makes perfect sense to train with it nad be capable with it. That benefit and practicality ends abruptly when you enter the civilian world where carrying a bolo around all day might be inappropriate or unfeasible.
.....So the ability of a... person to deal with strikes like the ones you mentioned has very little bearing, since those are not generally the kinds of attacks they're likely to face.
Hope that answers the question...
|
Not to argue the point (if it's still there) but to offer my perspective...
There ain't much use for a katana, that's for sure. What's interesting to me about "sword arts" is the versatility of the weapon. There is no need these days to sever arms or heads but the sword makes a fine stick. Some specialized skills with it include but are not limited to using it while still in it's sheath as an impact weapon. Also disarming the weapon with haste and skill. Grappling with the weapon or reaping the legs without intent to sever. Choking, locking, and surgical cutting to incapacitate as opposed to outright slaughter.
There is often a pommel to counter balance a blade... Makes a damn fine "stick"... Golf club, bat, shotgun, broomstick, antenna or a chair... Fencing principles, shielding and footwork are invaluable...
Just my humble opinion... Nothing like learning proper distance and timing...