View Single Post
Old 06-01-2008, 01:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tant01
Humble Moderator
 
Tant01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Ca. USA
Posts: 5,114
Groans: 0
Groaned at 14 Times in 9 Posts
Tant01 is a splendid one to beholdTant01 is a splendid one to beholdTant01 is a splendid one to beholdTant01 is a splendid one to beholdTant01 is a splendid one to beholdTant01 is a splendid one to behold
Default

...[Have no doubt about this: Slice would be destroyed by any legitimate mixed martial artist. Had Slice faced ex-WWE champion Brock Lesnar, the current UFC rookie hopeful, he’d have been beaten in less than two minutes.
As it was, Slice struggled his way to a sloppy third-round knockout of a complete tomato can.
You can’t blame Slice, because he had no business being in a main event of a mixed martial arts bout at this stage of his progression. It takes years of training and sacrifice to reach the main event in MMA and Slice was only there because of the notoriety he’d gained in his YouTube street brawls.
It was kind of ironic that at the show’s opening, Shamrock said with a straight face, “You won’t find them fighting in a bar and you won’t find them fighting in the street.”
Really?
Well, this card featured a guy (Baroni) who fights in bars and another who made his name by fighting in the streets.
CBS should have known better.
The fans deserved better.
The sport deserved better.
The CBS folks ought to take a look at the WEC card on the cable network Versus on Sunday to see how an MMA show is supposed to be put together. They’ll learn from watching that show how to introduce the viewers to the fighters but not drag the show on like a book that goes on 200 pages too long.
They’ll see quality fights between trained and competitive MMA fighters.
Hopefully, CBS didn’t manage to turn off a large segment to the country to what is a classic and compelling sport.]



MMA's network debut mocks true sport - MMA - Yahoo! Sports
__________________

"In all countries where personal freedom is valued, however much each individual may rely on legal redress, the right of each to carry arms - and these the best and the sharpest - for his own protection in case of extremity, is a right of nature indelible and irrepressible, and the more it is sought to be repressed the more it will recur."


James Paterson
Tant01 is offline   Reply With Quote