A) does apply. But I have never said anything like B). Funny how you have to make up what an opponent says in order to win an argument.
The last two paragraphs display how you misunderstand things so badly. Of course it is flicky kicky crap and, as such, whoever wins is TOTALLY irrelevant to the real world of real fighting. All these head kicks? Tell me, are the "fighters" allowed to take down their opponents when they stand on one leg? Are they allowed to catch one of these legs - elbow smash it, and then topple the opponent to the floor? Etc. etc.
No, of course not. The rules you "fight" under disallow these, and so many other, real techniques. But guess what? Mr. Nasty out in the street doesn't even know these rules. He will jump all over you and your fellow "fighters". He will rip into your faces, bite into your throats and, God fobid! he may even do the odd ungentlemanly low kick! What a Cad!
You don't train the most effective fighting moves and, of course, don't train how to counter them. Yet you try to point to these games you pla as somehow providing evidence of real fights? You are training how to play flicky kicky. You are detraining how to fight. Anyone who is courageous, strong, rock hard and fast will take you to pieces as easy as pie.
Instructors who claim this shite to be anything other than a game should be sued. And those who pretend that it is preparing their students for a real go should be put to death.
Fond regards!
|