![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
| Chinese Martial Arts Martial artists can discuss the Chinese Martial Arts with practitioners worldwide. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
OOOOOOOK, Bri do you have an opinion...Damn
Well about the maintaining the base I was referring to ground fighting and the fact they are not going to teh ground. and to take me down I can assure you would be difficult for any stylist, I can't comment on the average WC stylist. I do agree that I have seen some WC incorporate BJJ and it is rediculus to me as it is contrary to the style. But my point is that WC schools do teach Chin Na. Look I only speak from my experience and I already answered your question before you asked about the 1-3 inch punch. The reponse was about power not combat application. But I have seen this demonstrated and it was not a push. Bong Sau is not itself used as a strike, but bong sau extended is pek jeung which is used to strike. We can only speak from our experiences and can ultamitely we can agree to disagree tai-gip: I meant simultaneuos blocking/stricking. the one I can think of would be techniocally bong sau (like I said above) and gaan sau
__________________
A person who is said to be proficient in the arts is like a fool. Because of his foolishness in concerning himself with just one thing, he thinks of nothing else and thus becomes proficient. - Hagarkure |
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Meridian, ID, USA
Posts: 4,109
![]() |
Quote:
I like that one. I cannot be bothered to argue... ahhhhh, but I will anyway... Quote:
I've 'heard' of Tai Chi guys launching someone across the room. Heck, I even seed a video of it. However, it all remains suspect somehow... Personally, I got no beef with WC as a good friend of mine is fond of it. Then again, he never gave me any simultaneous luvvin' neither. ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
And 'caving in someone's rib cage'? Give me a f*ckin break. You can't do that with a shovel hook that you take all day to load up and you expect to do it with a crappy palm strike while your body is committed to ten other movements? Have you ever hit anybody before, or does your expertise come from reading martial arts stories? At best, you can hope to chip a floating rib, but even that is unlikely unless you are hitting with a very powerful shot--a weak palm heel won't do it.
__________________
"Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 104
![]() |
well Ryan i can tell you from actual experiance the rib cage will cave in with out exerting much effort i got jumped once and kicked one of the attackers in the chest with a side kick and it cave in his ribs now i know i can hit harder than i kicked him...
the reason a 3 way strike isnt hard is because it there in the forms and wooden dummy techniques and i guess because i spent four years 12 hours a day on wing chun.... and i didnt think the question was about actual technique but whether or not the style had effective moves .. on based on the attitude most people have that effective means damage causing or pain giving wing chun is certainly up there and i wasnt actualy suggesting the removal of the head with a kick or elbo arnt we allowed poetice liscence i was suggesting that yes you learn power striking in mauy thai but wing chun has just slightly deadlier applications of force oh and i keep forgeting everyone else knows it all and can do it all already
__________________
i am here today |
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: koko
Posts: 8,349
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
A person who is said to be proficient in the arts is like a fool. Because of his foolishness in concerning himself with just one thing, he thinks of nothing else and thus becomes proficient. - Hagarkure |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,415
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
A person who is said to be proficient in the arts is like a fool. Because of his foolishness in concerning himself with just one thing, he thinks of nothing else and thus becomes proficient. - Hagarkure |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 104
![]() |
ipon i was told everything was a strike and left to figure it out myself
oh and at the time training was my job used to teach as well ive been in ma since i was a very little kid do you need to actualy use every technique you have to know you can use it what is with you dont you think before you type anyone here taught a neck break but arnt sure it would work because they havnt tested it .. broken someones arm or leg..no.. must mean you cant or wont be able to..... grabbed someone by the family jules and squezed till they screamed..no ...must mean you cant look i can understand you disagreeing with me but dont be insulting and at least think about it first .... unless you know everything ? no ...me neither but lost of people know and can do things we cant dosnt meant its not real because we havnt heard it or seen it or done it...
__________________
i am here today |
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Or is this more "poetice liscence"?
__________________
"Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|