You have a lot of really good stuff listed here. It's nice to see a new thread by a articulate martial artist who obviously knows their stuff. As far as filipino vs samuri in individual battles during the japanese invasion, it depended on the area. The filipino arts (at that time) were very styalized. Most masters that we look to now for info. ( especially the late Professor Remy Presas - Modern Arnis) spent their youth traveling from island to island and village to village learning individual techniques from a particular master and combining them into one system. Also during the primary occupation ( if you're talking about ww2 era) the samuri had already been banned by the emperor and the soldiers sword techniques were significantly watered down from the samuri of the previous century( the japanese moving to a more modern army).
Specificaly about your question, in conversations I had with Remy Presas, and later with GM Cacoy Canente (doce pares escrima), filipinos who were effective with close in techniques (like abinico corto) had great success against the japanese once they got inside the initial sword slash-thrust. Double bladed techniques were also effective (sinewali and redondo). Ultimately I think it depends on the skill of the practitioner. there weren't many 1 on 1 open confrontations though. The filipinos weren't allowed to train or practice their art(just like the Okinawans). It was hidden in song and dance, like Capoeta in Brazil. I hope this helps.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks