![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
| Japanese Martial Arts Martial artists can discuss the Japanese Martial Arts with practitioners worldwide. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
I'm currently looking into a few martial arts, trying to narrow down what I'd like to take. My main focus on self-defense. However, most people have been telling me that if I want REAL, effective self-defense, I should stay away from any type of karate. Part of this might be sparring style, if it's a little light on contact. But other than that, I can't figure out why so many people are against it for defense. Can anyone explain this to me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,617
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not all karate styles are "useless" for self-defense. Kyokushin is a good example of a style that spars full-contact.
I took three months of Shito-ryu karate many years ago. I didn't like it because I disliked the training methods - standing in rows and doing kihon (basic kicks, punches and blocks), one-step sparring (A does a reverse punch and freezes, B counters), and kata kata kata. We did a little non-contact point sparring, to score your technique had to be perfect (even if the definition of a perfect technique left you wide open). The sensei said time and again "Karate is not for fighting. It's about making yourself a better person." That's for starters...
__________________
"It was about that time I realized that searching was my symbol, the emblem of those who go out at night with nothing in mind, the motives of a destroyer of compasses." -Cortázar |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 79
![]() |
In a way, a martial art shouldn't be about fighting. It should be about protecting yourself and others. People have this wrong idea about MA these days and it could largely be due to fight/MMA tournaments.
Martial arts weren't created so people could step into an octagon and beat the shit out of each other. That isn't the true martial way anyway. So anyway, Karate is not useless. Even the not-so-respected Shotokan is good when trained right. There is no useless style, only useless practitioners and teachers. Lot of UFC fanatics respond to that by saying, "Losers who can't fight say that to make themselves feel better". That = pure ignorance and stupidity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: koko
Posts: 8,464
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Now you've cut out the middle-man and are arguing with yourself! ![]()
__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 37
![]() |
Well, you have a choice. You can go to the "traditional martial arts" schools, which have a more philosophical spin and are focused on your training as a way of life in which self defense can be considered a by product. Then you also have the "fighting arts" schools, which seem to eschew the philosophy and teach you how to fight. Period.
There is overlap, of course, but as others have said in this thread, the method of training is paramount. A karate school could work out just fine for your goals if they focus on how their techniques work against resisting opponents in non-choreographed, high pressure situations. However, if you see a class where they spend more time hitting the air than pads and each other (in a controlled setting of course!) then I am not sure it's what you want. As always, this is based on my experience ... others are different, I'm sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 37
![]() |
Quote:
As a side note - if the goal of a traditional MA is to "make you a better person", as some schools profess, and the school uses meditation, philosophy, conflict resolution, forms, sparring, and heck, even community service ... then yes, self defense can be considered one of the by-products of that training. It's one of the things you develop while working towards "becoming a better person". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,617
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Throwing punches in the air while someone counts to ten in Chinese/Japanese/Korean is "dead" training.
Shadowboxing, moving around, visualizing an opponent is "alive". Pulling off a "move" against an opponent who has thrown an attack and then freezes (even if it was a full speed, full power attack) is dead. Pulling off a move against a moving, semi-resisting opponent is alive, especially if you gradually reduce the controlled aspects of the drill until it is sparring. Katas - dead. Working combinations against a trainer using focus mits/pads - alive (if done properly) Notice - I said NOTHING about BJJ, MT, the UFC, or MMA. If you train with aliveness, it doesn't matter what style you practice, you can be effective. The problem is that the rigidity inherent in many TMAs doesn't permit altering of training methods. That's why they are called traditional. Another problem is that arts such as Aikido, Hapkido, and traditional Jujutsu have techniques that are TOO DANGEROUS to practice safely against a fully resisting opponent. How can you safely practice a full-force eye-jab against a resisting opponent? And if you can't practice it, how can you be sure of it working in a self-defense situation?
__________________
"It was about that time I realized that searching was my symbol, the emblem of those who go out at night with nothing in mind, the motives of a destroyer of compasses." -Cortázar |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||||
|
Registered User
|
[quote=aseepish]Throwing punches in the air while someone counts to ten in Chinese/Japanese/Korean is "dead" training.[/QUOOTE]
That's what you start with, in some styles even standing in ready stance ( shoulderwidth), I would very often skip this and the traditional walking up and down and in stead do something like: Quote:
Quote:
Problem is a lot of trad karate schools get stuck at the first level and see that as a goal in itself ( exams) and not as a means to, as a step towards another goal Quote:
These combos, though pre-arranged, when done against a semi or full ressistive opponents, can be "nearly" alive Quote:
As long as you don't rely soley on eye-jab like techniques, it should not be much of a problem Think of this if they are difficult to pull off, why are they prohibited in MMA? As for people always mentioning Kyokushin, I'm sorry people but besides full contact sparring, they do the rest as mentioned above, standing basics, pre-arranged kumite with non resistive opponents, kata with rediculous reverse enginered bunkai, the works Some Okinawan styles might not do FC sparring but the rest the do as I described ( marching up and down the Dojo is a japanese thing) so in my opinion these would be better suited for SD PS I have done japanes Wado Karate so am not trying to promote my style
__________________
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Best Self Defense System to study ? | holyman | Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum | 161 | 10-09-2006 08:45 PM |
| I've been doing research on KARATE... lots of reading. only serious heads may enter. | crazyjoe380 | Japanese Martial Arts | 37 | 11-11-2004 03:10 AM |
| Karate- what chances does it stand on the street? | Phorce | Japanese Martial Arts | 106 | 10-30-2004 12:03 PM |
| So what can be done to fix Karate? | darrianation | Japanese Martial Arts | 51 | 01-30-2004 03:12 PM |
| Karate, can anyone tell me its a useless martial art | Whtown | Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum | 29 | 01-25-2001 06:22 AM |