Sure - it's "ki," like in "kiai" or "Aikido."
Do Japanese martial arts have the concept of chi? I've never really heard any Japanese stylist talk about internal energies. Can someone explain to me their philosophy on this subject. Thanks.
Mark R. III
3rd level black sash
Sure - it's "ki," like in "kiai" or "Aikido."
The Japanese language contains over 11,442 known usages of "ki" as a compound. As a compound, it may represent syllables associated with the mind, the heart, feeling, the atmosphere, and flavor...
Wiki...
"In all countries where personal freedom is valued, however much each individual may rely on legal redress, the right of each to carry arms - and these the best and the sharpest - for his own protection in case of extremity, is a right of nature indelible and irrepressible, and the more it is sought to be repressed the more it will recur."
James Paterson
Yep.
And although it doesn't often get recognized by Western practitioners...
Ki (chi) is often used to describe the proper body mechanics and body dynamics used in the correct application of a technique.
Sha, the opposite of ki (chi) is used to describe incorrect mechanics and dynamics.
It also applies to the circumstances of the fight or conflict, situation or event: Ki (chi) is used to describe the proper social mechanics and dynamics of handling the situation.
Improper social mechanics and dynamics are identified as 'Sha'.
So the Japanese have both ki (chi) and sha just like the Chinese do.
Oh darn, that's just my reflection.
... but some people still see ki as some mystic inner force that you have to harness and project like Ken & Ryu do in Streetfighter II.
I'm pretty sure you need lots of it to find the dragonballs.
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.
Finding a dragon's balls seems like a lot of hard work. I'll stick to suburi, thanks...![]()
"In all countries where personal freedom is valued, however much each individual may rely on legal redress, the right of each to carry arms - and these the best and the sharpest - for his own protection in case of extremity, is a right of nature indelible and irrepressible, and the more it is sought to be repressed the more it will recur."
James Paterson
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks