Hmm ... I'm not sure I understand the question ... but I'll try to address this.Originally posted by DavinWest
hey just a quick question.
How many of you are all about just fighting, period?
Cuz I see two sides, defense and than just fighting. how many of you are into actual fighting, some starts crap and you retaliate, or are you more defend yourself -no more, no less, do you know what I mean?
alright kewl
l8er
In my mind, "defense" means going home safely at night to my wife ... not to the hospital, jail, or morgue. This means that I'm going to (in PC terms) "nullify the immediate threat as quickly as possible and extricate myself from the situation as early as possible." In more colloquial terms, "I'm going to shut him/them down as quickly as possible so I can get on to more important things."
Since I don't want to end up in jail, I do keep in mind the fact that once the "immediate threat is nullified" I become the agressor if I continue attacking. So ... once I feel that I'm out of immediate danger, I walk away. By the same token, if I see an exit, I run like hell before I even have to fight.
Pak Herman Suwanda (RIP) summed it up best when describing the Mande Muda logo. To paraphrase: the "trisula" (sai) in the logo has three points.
First Point: Talk
Second Point: Run
Third Point: Fight
If you can't talk your way out, you run. If you can't run, then you fight. If you get them out of order, then you may end up fighting the bad guy, running from the police, and talking to the judge ... this is the wrong order.
I'm a firm believer in this strategum.
So ... if that didn't answer your question, then you'll have to rephrase your question :-)
Regards, Mike


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks