The only real problem I see here. (I'm not claiming you are pushing any of this. Just offering clarity on the subject)
First you have to take in the 3 years of training you have had (that you in some cases are discarding) and ask if you are better prepared for your alive training because of it. I would think an honest person would say yes. Or would at least say most people would be better off. So people should not be discouraged from going through the same 3 years of training you did to get where you are now at.
If you watch how MMA fighters routinely get hurt from their training (fights getting canceled or you always here on TUF from every coach about how nobody fights 100%). That is you trained FMA, Silat or some elemets of JKD like MMA you would be Dead, crippled, Missing one or two eyes or too injured to train. It's one of the reason's sports like Boxing & Jits can make such an effective (notice can not an automatic does) form of self defense. They lend them selves to to hard training with out being dangerous.
The problem with the pattern thinking you find in JKD or FMA comes not from the art but from the teachers. If you are learning from a seminar Sifu (someone who got their Certification from a distance vs years of training full time with Say Dan or Paul.) they have to have patterns to learn it from themselves. Some never make the jump past the patterns.
Not so much a tangent as an example - In you look around you hear talk about the various stages of sombrada. (a counter for counter drill in some FMA styles) If you ask people like Sifu Vunak he doesn't know what you mean. He learned sombrada from Dan. Dan can probably teach you more about sombrada in a hour or two than most people teaching know. When Dan is at seminars he has to spoon feed people a little at a time. Then if they get that down they can add more the next time. The sad thing is most never progress. If you don't know how to walk right he can't teach you to run.
It's the same with lockflows, and all the drills JKD and FMA teach. When I went to seminars you always heard that (from Dan, Larry, Paul & Tim Tackett) that this was the basic level and they would hint or flat out tell you what to do to advance it. Larry at a seminar mentioned that at one seminar they locked the doors, put on the gloves and (the drills he was showing us) did them for real. He said only 5 people came back from lunch.
So in general when you hear anyone talk about aliveness and its lack in JKD or FMA either they are dishonest or really don't know what they are talking about. It's been their since at least the 80's (I'm not that old). Now it might be true for individual schools/instructors. But not the Art as a whole.
And when you hear some of them (again in general terms) bash arts. When I hears someone bash FMA training or trapping training. If they look about as good as someone with 1 year or less of training I don't give their opinion much weight. (Mike Wright clearly doesn't fit in this category I've not seen his stick work but his empty hands is crisp.)
I'm sure back when the FMA and Indonesian arts were being used against people with knives, swords & guns (look up the MORO WARRIORS) their were people who bitched about how the drilling was not alive enough. And the ones that trained too alive probably eventually died. And the ones that skipped the drills got killed in combat. Unfortunately we live in too civilized society to weed this type of thinking out.
Now all I'M doing is adding some perspective to a good post. Anyone who trains anything should examine it every so often. But remember when anyone talks about anything being functional or alive it should be considered as an opinion not a fact or a truth. If you take the Dog Brothers no one sane can argue that what they do isn't functional and realistic. But I bet most (if not all) the alive camps would not consider what they do sane. By the same token these schools pushing the aliveness should understand it's not for everyone. And you can learn with out it. It will take longer. It might not be as effective. But it would be better than nothing at all.
Tangent - I recently was looking for a place to train. It was a MMA school with one JKD class. The acting instructor (he was teaching the class but was not certified as a teacher by his sifu) was always ripping on the Dog Brothers (the school shall remain nameless) but its one of many reasons I bailed on the school. As a rule for me. If they are ripping on anyone else I ask this question why are they ripping on others. You only put down others to make what you do look better. Which means what you are pushing probably not that good.
Tangent Over
Again I'm not bashing anyone here. If I'm reading Wi-stickbox right I agree with his post. Just offering an opinion to help those who don't have years of training like WISB.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
). Now it might be true for individual schools/instructors. But not the Art as a whole.


Bookmarks