I think the competition is changing because of the "civilization" of the competition, not due to the styles involved.
No strikes to certain body parts, no strikes of a certain style while on the ground, etc, etc. This has all been done because they want to make it "less brutal and destructive."
You can see the same effects in other sports as well.
Football is much more "humane" than it was 20 years ago. With a whole list of new rules meant to protect the players.
Boxing has changed as well. They stop fights much sooner than they used to.
Audiences want to see pure destruction, yet they don't want anyone to really be hurt. The dual nature of the masses.
I agree with you in the area of more striking being involved. That's what makes it more exciting for the spectators. People don't want to pay $300 a seat to watch two highly trained athletes play chess. They want to see fists flying and knock outs.
But as far as more "stand up" arts, I would have to disagree. Pure stand up arts have been pummeled in mixed martial arts. When you cannot strike vital points and use other "secret deadly tactics" in the ring, the "stand up" arts are more at a disadvantage.
The nature of the contest gives grapplers an advantage from the get-go.
If you REALLY want to see pure MMA competition you'll have to lock to people in a pit and make it life or death. Then you'll see which arts and which competitors are for real....but we already know the answer to that little fantasy.
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
SZ


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks