![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
| Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum Discuss the extremely effective art of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, No-Holds-Barred and Mixed Martial Arts with experts worldwide. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: île de la Réunion, océan Indien
Posts: 28
![]() |
The year 2001 shown to us 2 superfights :
the Pride Grand 2000 Prix winner Mark "The Hammer" Coleman (wrestling) against the KOK 2000 winner Rodrigo "Minotauro" Nogueira (brazilian jiu-jitsu); and the absolute Abu Dhabi champion 1998 Mario "The Zen Machine" Sperry (brazilian jiu-jitsu) against the absolute Abu Dhabi champion 2000 Mark "The Titan" Kerr (wrestling). Results : wrestling : 1 ; brazilian jiu-jitsu : 1. What would happen if the third fight do determine the most efficient style was between the best wrestler in the world against the best jiu-jitsuka in the world : Rulon Gardner (greco-roman wrestling) against Fernando "Margarida" Pontes (gracie jiu-jitsu) ? Who would win ??? L'année 2001 nous a offert deux super-combats en arts martiaux mixtes : - Mario Sperry (jiu-jitsu) contre Mark Kerr (lutte) - et Mark Coleman (lutte) contre Rodrigo Nogueira (jiu-jitsu). Résultats : 1 victoire pour la lutte (Kerr) et 1 victoire pour le jiu-jitsu (Nogueira). Que se passerait-il si, pour déterminer la supériorité de l'un de ces deux styles, on opposait le meilleur lutteur du monde (Rulon Gardner) au meilleur jiu-jitsuka (Fernando "Margarida" Pontes) ? Qui l'emporterait à votre avis ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: île de la Réunion, océan Indien
Posts: 28
![]() |
Irrelevant ? Could you precise your mind, please.
Or may be you mean that in a wrestling competition, Gardner would win; in a BJJ competition, Pontes would win; ... but what do you think could happen in a "mixed rules" fight, let's say a fight like under Abu Dhabi submission championship's rules ? Other's opinion are interesting if they argue positively. Toujours intéressant d'avoir l'avis des autres pour peu qu'ils argumentent constructivement. You would buy it for a $. How much is it in € ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,368
![]() |
wrestling is good..
but bjj is better.. before wrestlers didnt know what to expect.. wrestlers give up ther arms too much and end up getting triangle choked severn vs gracie rodrigo vs colman http://www.mmafighting.com/videoclip...annoguiera.ram wrestlers are getting retrained or also learning bjj its not about what style its all mixed martial arts my teacher teaches bjj and roman greco |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Meridian, ID, USA
Posts: 4,109
![]() |
"What would happen if the third fight do determine the most efficient style was between the best wrestler in the world against the best jiu-jitsuka in the world..."
My point is that one fight will not determine "the most efficient style in the world" no matter who fights in the fight. I hope this is enough of a positive argument for you. ![]() About seven and one half I believe is the current exchange rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Novice
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 83
![]() |
You said it perfectly CrazyJoe. In the old days wrestlers would lose to BJJ guys. Now days there is no such thing as "just a wrestler" in mma. Wrestlers are learning BJJ submissions. BJJ guys are learning wrestling style takedowns. It's all part of the same game not one Vs. the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Novice
|
Ok one fight was mma/nhb and the other was submission grappling, plus how can we judge wich style is better in 2 or 3 fight? Style is important but the most important is the person, one really weak bjj fighter could lose to a good karate fighter! lol
But if you mean style vs. style well the best match I think was Royce Gracie vs. Dan Severn both fighter in there prime, whit Royce winning by triangle choke.
__________________
"im about 210 5'5" but im not all fat"-Noctural BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Papua New Guinea
Posts: 671
![]() |
A true master of Ninjutsu will defeat a mere wrestler every time.
Look at Steve Jennum vs Harold Howard.
__________________
"seriouly i would like to fight shimora for the internet fighter world titel, and beathim and chop of his fingers and hang them on the mirror of scooter " Duchman at The Choke Zone forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Meridian, ID, USA
Posts: 4,109
![]() |
Whatever happened to ol' Jennum anyway? If a true master of Ninjitsu can defeat a wrestler everytime, and BJJ guys routinely trounce Ninjitsu masters (only in the ring of course) then, by substitution, BJJ guys will totally dominate wrestlers.
All B can defeat C All A can defeat B Therefore, All A can defeat C. Substitute: A= BJJ B= Ninjitsu Master C= Wrestler Classic case of a categorical syllogism (I believe), a subset of deductive reasoning. HOWEVER, is it valid? Let's check For it to be valid we need to test that the premises support the conclusion. In this case given that premise 1 (Ninjitsu vs. Wrestling) could be true. And premise 2 (BJJ vs. Ninjitsu) could also be true. And both statements appear to support the conclusion. If the premises support the conclusion, then the argument is valid. Whether the premises are true or not. So we now have a valid argument that BJJ is dominant over wrestling. Let's attempt to determine whether the argument is Sound. For the argument to be sound, it must first be valid (i.e. the premise(s) support(s) the conclusion.) This is true. However, in addition to this, the premise(s) AND the conclusion must be true. We can pretty much agree that the second premise (BJJ vs. Ninjitsu) has been proven in numerous MMA competitions. However, the empirical data that supports premise 1 is suspect for two reasons: 1)There have been very few competitions between wrestlers and ninja masters in mma, so our supporting data is inconclusive. And since we don't operate on the fallacy that a statement is "true until proven false", we must assume that this statement is false (until later proven to be true) . And 2), since it's generally agreed that ninjas are full of shit (especially Shimora ) then we arrive at the conclusion that premise one is suspect at best.Without (demonstratebly) true premises we cannot have a Sound argument. So although our argument is valid, it is not sound. Therefore it may, or may not be true. I guess more research is needed. SZ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: île de la Réunion, océan Indien
Posts: 28
![]() |
Win Harold Howard Submission (Strikes) UFC 3 - The American Dream 9-9-1994
Win Melton Bowen Submission (Armlock) UFC 4 - Revenge of the Warriors 12-16-1994 Loss David Abbott Submission (Neck Crank) UU 95 - Ultimate Utlimate 1995 12-16-1995 Loss Marco Ruas Submission (Punches) WVC 1 - World Vale Tudo Championship 1 8-14-1996 Loss Jason Godsey N/A EC 4 - Extreme Challenge 4 2-22-1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Meridian, ID, USA
Posts: 4,109
![]() |
What were the styles of Jennum's opponents?
Harold Howard was karate/jiu jitsu. Melton Bowen was a Boxer. David Abbot is a pit fighter. Marco Ruas is Ruas Vale Tudo Jason Godsey is unlisted for style. (source is Sherdog.com) So Jennum beat how many wrestlers? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Novice
|
Quote:
Might not go over too well if you do that in the ring...but who knows? The crowd might like it although the police might take a dim view of such an event. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|