![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
| Open Access Anyone can post here. No username or password required! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 985
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Reading through an old forum (somewhere beyond this one which is 13) I came across someone saying "looks like he doesn't know what an IP address is".
Since I don't know what it is either I thought I should ask.
__________________
Enemies Strengthen, Allies weaken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 985
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Thanks alot. haha it's my knowledge know. I stole your teachings....
Only joking, I am truly grateful that you have shared this valuble information with me.
__________________
Enemies Strengthen, Allies weaken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
Scott Louisville, KY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacifica, CA USA
Posts: 571
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
The Internet Engineering Task Force (http://www.ietf.org) has the responsibility to maintain and update standards related to the Internet Protocol. Perhaps a good place to start is Assigned Numbers: RFC-943: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0943.txt?number=943 Once you understand that then you can browse that site for as much information as you need. Also of note in such a discussion is the original proposal for Internet Subnetting and subnet masks: 0950 Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure. J.C. Mogul, J. Postel. Aug-01-1985. Finally, you may want to check out the latest and most commonly used method for carving up IP-Addresses: Classless Inter-Domain Routing: 1518 An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR. Y. Rekhter, T. Li. September 1993. 1519 Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy. V. Fuller, T. Li, J. Yu, K. Varadhan. September 1993. Terry P.S.: If you think this is too geeky, stop and consider for a second that Tony Li and Yakov Rekhter are both have 9 figure net worths. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 985
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Enemies Strengthen, Allies weaken. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacifica, CA USA
Posts: 571
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
An IP-Address is not a path-vector. Think of this in terms of snail mail delivery: An IP-Address is like your street address. The path your mailman takes to deliver the mail is not of concern to anybody but the postal service--and then it is done for efficiency.
When you start talking about path vectors in service provider networks you get into routing policy, MPLS and routing protocols such as BGP. Um, that's a whole different kettle of fish. Re: The mechanics of getting banned. It works differently based on the configuration. Banning your IP address would be a firewall change rather than a application layer (aka web, E-mail address) change. But since many users have IP-Addresses assigned out of pools held by ISPs (Internet Service Providers) then IP-Address is no longer a constant from day to day. I suppose you could ban a whole subnet or range of addresses. There are a range of countermeasures. It really depends on the situation. If there is a criminal intent involved, such as pedophelia, we can work with the ISP to trace it through such things as RADIUS accounting records, SMTP headers, etc. In one case a while ago I called the FBI after getting very polite but ultimately suspicious inquiries from a Pakistani-based sports organization that seemed a little to eager to learn FMA and MT (and couldn't explain why their cover story kept changing). In that case, you continue the conversation and don't let the other party know that someone is tracing them. When you start doing national security work it gets even more involved. There are a few very sophisticated people out there who have enough knowledge of Internetworking systems to evade the obvious traps and make life difficult for a security guy. Stalking the wily hacker can be a challenging game. So, that's what could happen. As far as you getting banned, you conduct doesn't warrant someone taking that kind of interest in you. The more likely scenario may be that, faced with such a high level of troll traffic on defend.net, the moderators may despair and either resign or just check out. Then you have to deal with new moderators who may be even worse than me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 985
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Enemies Strengthen, Allies weaken. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|