![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
| Open Access Anyone can post here. No username or password required! |
| View Poll Results: Most useless martial arts styles: | |||
| Karate |
|
29 | 21.32% |
| Kung Fu |
|
20 | 14.71% |
| Tae Kwon Do |
|
78 | 57.35% |
| American Kickboxing |
|
34 | 25.00% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
#62 (permalink) |
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,423
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is a strange phemoenon indeed when martial artists from one style change their training to be more like another, and then still claim to be doing their original style.
Who remmebrs UFC 3 when Kimo claimed to be doing TKD? |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Chris, Toudiyama[NL] : I just meant that all I saw was lower leg/shin style thai kicks. I was expecting more variety of kicks from the karate stylist.
This is off the topic but can on of you answer a question: I have always wondered why in point tourney a kick was scored higher than a punch. It seems much more difficult land a strike than a kick in these karate events. I know this may sound silly, but my first official instructor spoiled me by letting me grapple when we sparred and after I realized I could not grapple tournements, in any range, I lost interest....anyway just curious
__________________
A person who is said to be proficient in the arts is like a fool. Because of his foolishness in concerning himself with just one thing, he thinks of nothing else and thus becomes proficient. - Hagarkure |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
IPON:
In WKF ( WUKO) karate, High kicks are scored higher than punches and specificaly the difficult kicks like ushiro mawashi geri ( without turn) The fact that is wasn't clear that one of the fighters was karate was because of the rules. Do you think someone competing iunder K1 rules will fight the same as under WKF rules? In Kyokushin/Seido/Ashihara/Enshin/Oyama karate you will predominantly see lowkicks and high roundhouse kicks Thai Bri That is because their main thing stays the same If you are doing MT and augment that with some groundfighting, what do you consider yourself?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Toudiyama[NL]: Thanks. That was my question also if it was a thai fight under thai rules. The post stated Kyokoshin Karate vs MT so actually I expected open competion between the 2 fighters. I would never expect reverse punches they would not be practicle in a ring with gloves on. but the fight seemed more Thi based only low leg kicks (I may have missed a roundhouse).
I guess my point.....(sigh...I bow my head in shame but I must agree with thi bri ) but it is hard to say that karate beat MT if they used MT rules (and vice versa MT over karate) IMORegarding the points scoring in karate tourneys (japanese korean, etc) so kicks are scored higher becuase of the difficulty of the kick. I can understand that logic. again, I gues I look at these sparring that it is tecnically more difficult to land a punch, but the kicks would require a greater level of skill and power. Cool
__________________
A person who is said to be proficient in the arts is like a fool. Because of his foolishness in concerning himself with just one thing, he thinks of nothing else and thus becomes proficient. - Hagarkure |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,423
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
As for punches being more difficult to land, I didn't feel like that in WUKO/WKF karate competition They are more difficult to land compared to a full contact match. Pointsparring is best compared to fencing If you would use a sharp weapon you could cut open someone but if someone else would attack with a broadsword, you better not try to block it the fencer will have to strike over and over again to do a lot of damage, the guy with the broadsword only has to hit once or twice
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Meridian, ID, USA
Posts: 4,109
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
What a punkass!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 520
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
What happens is that a MT fighter that augments his training with groundfighting may be called MT but as soon as a Karate fighter does that, he should stop calling it Karate These days no single art fighter is doing well, even the GJJ and BJJ people train their standup part more than in the past if they want to fight in a MMA event, I remember Royce claiming there is no striking in GJJ ( he said in JJ ) but you can see a lot of BJJ/GJJ fighters entering have trained their strikingskills Does this mean they should stop calling it BJJ/GJJ?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) |
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,423
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The point is this. It is pointless to say "XXX Kung Fu is better than YYY Karate" when XXX Kung Fu is taking almost everything useful it has from other arts. If it is no longer XXX Kung Fu, it is stupid and meaningless to refer to it by that name.
I started in Shukokai Karate. In a real fight I would be using elements of Shukokai, Combatives, Thai Boxing and ground grappling. Would it be meaningful of me to then say "look how good Shukokai Karate is" Get it? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|