WMDs found in Iraq

treelizard · 06-25-2006, 07:09 PM

Okay, so my friends serving in Baghdad have informed me that WMDs were found and asking if any of this has gotten into the mainstream media. Anybody got anything??

treelizard · 06-25-2006, 07:26 PM

Some moron neg repped me for being a "rumor monger" for posting this, even though it came directly from friends who are serving right now, n the front lines in Baghdad.

Who do you believe more, those on the front lines, or the mainstream media?

treelizard · 06-25-2006, 07:29 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

WASHINGTON — The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

"We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

• Click here to read the declassified portion of the NGIC report.

He added that the report warns about the hazards that the chemical weapons could still pose to coalition troops in Iraq.

"The purity of the agents inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal," Santorum read from the document.

(Story continues below)

ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertise Here

"This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.

Hoekstra said the report, completed in April but only declassified now, shows that "there is still a lot about Iraq that we don't fully understand."

Asked why the Bush administration, if it had known about the information since April or earlier, didn't advertise it, Hoekstra conjectured that the president has been forward-looking and concentrating on the development of a secure government in Iraq.

Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."

The official said the findings did raise questions about the years of weapons inspections that had not resulted in locating the fairly sizeable stash of chemical weapons. And he noted that it may say something about Hussein's intent and desire. The report does suggest that some of the weapons were likely put on the black market and may have been used outside Iraq.

He also said that the Defense Department statement shortly after the March 2003 invasion saying that "we had all known weapons facilities secured," has proven itself to be untrue.

"It turned out the whole country was an ammo dump," he said, adding that on more than one occasion, a conventional weapons site has been uncovered and chemical weapons have been discovered mixed within them.

Hoekstra and Santorum lamented that Americans were given the impression after a 16-month search conducted by the Iraq Survey Group that the evidence of continuing research and development of weapons of mass destruction was insignificant. But the National Ground Intelligence Center took up where the ISG left off when it completed its report in November 2004, and in the process of collecting intelligence for the purpose of force protection for soldiers and sailors still on the ground in Iraq, has shown that the weapons inspections were incomplete, they and others have said.

"We know it was there, in place, it just wasn't operative when inspectors got there after the war, but we know what the inspectors found from talking with the scientists in Iraq that it could have been cranked up immediately, and that's what Saddam had planned to do if the sanctions against Iraq had halted and they were certainly headed in that direction," said Fred Barnes, editor of The Weekly Standard and a FOX News contributor.

"It is significant. Perhaps, the administration just, they think they weathered the debate over WMD being found there immediately and don't want to return to it again because things are otherwise going better for them, and then, I think, there's mindless resistance to releasing any classified documents from Iraq," Barnes said.

The release of the declassified materials comes as the Senate debates Democratic proposals to create a timetable for U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq. The debate has had the effect of creating disunity among Democrats, a majority of whom shrunk Wednesday from an amendment proposed by Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts to have troops to be completely withdrawn from Iraq by the middle of next year.

At the same time, congressional Republicans have stayed highly united, rallying around a White House that has seen successes in the last couple weeks, first with the death of terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, then the completion of the formation of Iraq's Cabinet and then the announcement Tuesday that another key Al Qaeda in Iraq leader, "religious emir" Mansour Suleiman Mansour Khalifi al-Mashhadani, or Sheik Mansour, was also killed in a U.S. airstrike.

Santorum pointed out that during Wednesday's debate, several Senate Democrats said that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, a claim, he said, that the declassified document proves is untrue.

"This is an incredibly — in my mind — significant finding. The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false," he said.

As a result of this new information, under the aegis of his chairmanship, Hoekstra said he is going to ask for more reporting by the various intelligence agencies about weapons of mass destruction.

"We are working on the declassification of the report. We are going to do a thorough search of what additional reports exist in the intelligence community. And we are going to put additional pressure on the Department of Defense and the folks in Iraq to more fully pursue a complete investigation of what existed in Iraq before the war," Hoekstra said.

FOX News' Jim Angle and Sharon Kehnemui Liss contributed to this report

BoarSpear · 06-25-2006, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treelizard

Okay, so my friends serving in Baghdad have informed me that WMDs were found and asking if any of this has gotten into the mainstream media. Anybody got anything??

Yes advice for you and your friends, if an ongoing op hasn't been reported that's this big of news, then national security or the lives of operators are probably still at stake...if your friends havent been told that "lose lips sink ships" maybe you oughtta do them a favor and tell them....you helping them circumvent operational security is likely to blow an ongoing mission...hey maybe they'll lose track of the other WMDs and people who move them since you gave the heads up!! good job keeping the conflict fueled...every little bit helps as Mossad likes to say.

treelizard · 06-26-2006, 02:10 AM

Sorry, but the press releases had been sent out and they were wondering if media had reported as they often don't. I'm sure if it wasn't reported they wouldn't have spoken about it.

BoarSpear · 06-26-2006, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treelizard

Sorry, but the press releases had been sent out and they were wondering if media had reported as they often don't. I'm sure if it wasn't reported they wouldn't have spoken about it.

uh huh...

Do you understand what that means? it means an embedded reporter saw or heard something and did his job, he sent out the press release to the Military officers who scan that shit for THINGS that cant be leaked YET then when it's cleared as safe by INTELLIGENCE people who see a bigger picture than those involved. If WMDs WERE FOUND AND YOU AINT HEARD ITS NOT OVER YET...HENCE IT WASNT CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE...THANKS FOR HELPING THE WAR EFFORT LIZ.

So about this whole thread you titled WMD found in IRAQ...Where the fukk are they? And please explain the relevence to this thread and the report you provided.

treelizard · 06-26-2006, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoarSpear

uh huh...

So about this whole thread you titled WMD found in IRAQ...Where the fukk are they? And please explain the relevence to this thread and the report you provided.

Maybe you could start by reading the actual article I posted on that thread. Do you really need us to hold your hand every step of the way? Also, you are the one that mentioned that thread on this one, so perhaps you could explain the relevance of that thread to this thread?

Garland · 06-26-2006, 02:21 AM

fox news=right-wing conservative propaganda machine.

Who else has the story...or is this an exclusive article? (seems like it would be a big deal to me.)

treelizard · 06-26-2006, 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoarSpear

Yes advice for you and your friends, if an ongoing op hasn't been reported that's this big of news, then national security or the lives of operators are probably still at stake...if your friends havent been told that "lose lips sink ships" maybe you oughtta do them a favor and tell them....you helping them circumvent operational security is likely to blow an ongoing mission...hey maybe they'll lose track of the other WMDs and people who move them since you gave the heads up!! good job keeping the conflict fueled...every little bit helps as Mossad likes to say.

Hmmm, if your concern was really about national security, wouldn't it have been better to e-mail a moderator or PM me and ask me to edit my post to actually take out that information instead of QUOTING it?

Oh wait a minute, you didn't respond until AFTER I'd posted the article....

BoarSpear · 06-26-2006, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treelizard

Maybe you could start by reading the actual article I posted on that thread. Do you really need us to hold your hand every step of the way? Also, you are the one that mentioned that thread on this one, so perhaps you could explain the relevance of that thread to this thread?

Dont tap dance, answer the question...WHY did YOU post that story in reference to supposed proof of WMD found at anytime, much less recently?

Dont try to be slick, answer the qiestion...I dont need my hand held

I'm not the idiot that post a thread then post an article completly unrelated to back it up...you are, you explain how its relevant...go ahead amuse me

I'm talking about this thread on WMD BTW you daffy

what the hell are rambling about from another thread?

BoarSpear · 06-26-2006, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treelizard

Hmmm, if your concern was really about national security, wouldn't it have been better to e-mail a moderator or PM me and ask me to edit my post to actually take out that information instead of QUOTING it?

Oh wait a minute, you didn't respond until AFTER I'd posted the article....

Exactly until you posted an article about what?

Garland · 06-26-2006, 02:49 AM

HA HA HA HA...what picture can I find for THIS?!!
sick sick sick sick...this should be good.

treelizard · 06-26-2006, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Uh huh...Do you understand what that means? it means an embedded reporter saw or heard something and did his job, he sent out the press release to the Military officers who scan that shit for THINGS that cant be leaked YET then when it's cleared as safe by INTELLIGENCE people who see a bigger picture than those involved. If WMDs WERE FOUND AND YOU AINT HEARD ITS NOT OVER YET...HENCE IT WASNT CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE...THANKS FOR HELPING THE WAR EFFORT LIZ.

Actually, Boar, if you had actually read the article you would have clearly seen right there in the first paragraph that Senator Rick Santorum reported the news in a conference call.

Here, I'll even quote it for you.

Quote:

We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

treelizard · 06-26-2006, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoarSpear

Dont tap dance, answer the question...WHY did YOU post that story in reference to supposed proof of WMD found at anytime, much less recently?

Dont try to be slick, answer the qiestion...I dont need my hand held

I'm not the idiot that post a thread then post an article completly unrelated to back it up...you are, you explain how its relevant...go ahead amuse me

WHY did I post this story in reference to supposed proof of WMD found at any time?

HMM! Maybe because it says "The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday."

This is unrelated how?

I was posting it to make a point that it hasn't gotten in mainstream media even though it was reported in a press conference, but hadn't gotten to it yet because I'm busy showing glaringly obvious links...

treelizard · 06-26-2006, 02:58 AM

Btw. the article was from the 22nd and today's the 25th... very relevant.

06-25-2006, 07:09 PM	#1 (permalink)
treelizard Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: the desert Posts: 3,442 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	WMDs found in Iraq Okay, so my friends serving in Baghdad have informed me that WMDs were found and asking if any of this has gotten into the mainstream media. Anybody got anything?? __________________ http://www.dirttime.org http://morewomeninmma.blogspot.com

06-25-2006, 07:26 PM	#2 (permalink)
treelizard Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: the desert Posts: 3,442 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	Some moron neg repped me for being a "rumor monger" for posting this, even though it came directly from friends who are serving right now, n the front lines in Baghdad. Who do you believe more, those on the front lines, or the mainstream media? __________________ http://www.dirttime.org http://morewomeninmma.blogspot.com

06-25-2006, 07:29 PM	#3 (permalink)
treelizard Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: the desert Posts: 3,442 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html WASHINGTON — The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday. "We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon. Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist." • Click here to read the declassified portion of the NGIC report. He added that the report warns about the hazards that the chemical weapons could still pose to coalition troops in Iraq. "The purity of the agents inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal," Santorum read from the document. (Story continues below) ADVERTISEMENTS Advertise Here "This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions. Hoekstra said the report, completed in April but only declassified now, shows that "there is still a lot about Iraq that we don't fully understand." Asked why the Bush administration, if it had known about the information since April or earlier, didn't advertise it, Hoekstra conjectured that the president has been forward-looking and concentrating on the development of a secure government in Iraq. Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions. "This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war." The official said the findings did raise questions about the years of weapons inspections that had not resulted in locating the fairly sizeable stash of chemical weapons. And he noted that it may say something about Hussein's intent and desire. The report does suggest that some of the weapons were likely put on the black market and may have been used outside Iraq. He also said that the Defense Department statement shortly after the March 2003 invasion saying that "we had all known weapons facilities secured," has proven itself to be untrue. "It turned out the whole country was an ammo dump," he said, adding that on more than one occasion, a conventional weapons site has been uncovered and chemical weapons have been discovered mixed within them. Hoekstra and Santorum lamented that Americans were given the impression after a 16-month search conducted by the Iraq Survey Group that the evidence of continuing research and development of weapons of mass destruction was insignificant. But the National Ground Intelligence Center took up where the ISG left off when it completed its report in November 2004, and in the process of collecting intelligence for the purpose of force protection for soldiers and sailors still on the ground in Iraq, has shown that the weapons inspections were incomplete, they and others have said. "We know it was there, in place, it just wasn't operative when inspectors got there after the war, but we know what the inspectors found from talking with the scientists in Iraq that it could have been cranked up immediately, and that's what Saddam had planned to do if the sanctions against Iraq had halted and they were certainly headed in that direction," said Fred Barnes, editor of The Weekly Standard and a FOX News contributor. "It is significant. Perhaps, the administration just, they think they weathered the debate over WMD being found there immediately and don't want to return to it again because things are otherwise going better for them, and then, I think, there's mindless resistance to releasing any classified documents from Iraq," Barnes said. The release of the declassified materials comes as the Senate debates Democratic proposals to create a timetable for U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq. The debate has had the effect of creating disunity among Democrats, a majority of whom shrunk Wednesday from an amendment proposed by Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts to have troops to be completely withdrawn from Iraq by the middle of next year. At the same time, congressional Republicans have stayed highly united, rallying around a White House that has seen successes in the last couple weeks, first with the death of terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, then the completion of the formation of Iraq's Cabinet and then the announcement Tuesday that another key Al Qaeda in Iraq leader, "religious emir" Mansour Suleiman Mansour Khalifi al-Mashhadani, or Sheik Mansour, was also killed in a U.S. airstrike. Santorum pointed out that during Wednesday's debate, several Senate Democrats said that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, a claim, he said, that the declassified document proves is untrue. "This is an incredibly — in my mind — significant finding. The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false," he said. As a result of this new information, under the aegis of his chairmanship, Hoekstra said he is going to ask for more reporting by the various intelligence agencies about weapons of mass destruction. "We are working on the declassification of the report. We are going to do a thorough search of what additional reports exist in the intelligence community. And we are going to put additional pressure on the Department of Defense and the folks in Iraq to more fully pursue a complete investigation of what existed in Iraq before the war," Hoekstra said. FOX News' Jim Angle and Sharon Kehnemui Liss contributed to this report __________________ http://www.dirttime.org http://morewomeninmma.blogspot.com

06-26-2006, 02:10 AM	#5 (permalink)
treelizard Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: the desert Posts: 3,442 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	Sorry, but the press releases had been sent out and they were wondering if media had reported as they often don't. I'm sure if it wasn't reported they wouldn't have spoken about it. __________________ http://www.dirttime.org http://morewomeninmma.blogspot.com

06-26-2006, 02:21 AM	#8 (permalink)
Garland Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Salt Lake City Posts: 5,013 Groans: 1 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	fox news=right-wing conservative propaganda machine. Who else has the story...or is this an exclusive article? (seems like it would be a big deal to me.) __________________ homo homini lupus

06-26-2006, 02:49 AM	#12 (permalink)
Garland Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Salt Lake City Posts: 5,013 Groans: 1 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	HA HA HA HA...what picture can I find for THIS?!! sick sick sick sick...this should be good. __________________ homo homini lupus

06-26-2006, 02:58 AM	#15 (permalink)
treelizard Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: the desert Posts: 3,442 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	Btw. the article was from the 22nd and today's the 25th... very relevant. __________________ http://www.dirttime.org http://morewomeninmma.blogspot.com

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
I'm off to Iraq	darrianation	Open Access	43	06-02-2006 10:33 AM
WMDs	nutter	Tactical Military and Law-Enforcement Training	8	05-30-2006 10:18 PM
war in iraq	EmptyneSs	Open Access	10	06-12-2005 04:20 PM
Fighting in Iraq	Bri Thai	Open Access	9	04-12-2003 02:52 PM