Uke

Bismarck Tribune - North Dakota News - Fargo man wrestles knife from attacker -- This story only says that the victim grabbed the knife hand and hit the mugger. Where did he attempt to te-bo him?

ISIAH CAREY'S 'INSITE': MAN ALLEGEDLY TRIES TO ATTACK QUANELL X AT FITNESS GYM! --- This story had several people overwhelm one man with a knife. When they wrote "wrestled" they didn't mean the kind that includes suplexes and firemen's carries. And in case you missed it, several people against one man with a knife hardly satisfies the challenge.

Women fend off attacker with Kleenex box, curtain rod -- In this story the robber never intended to hurt anyone. He could have easily have killed the elderly woman to quiet her or keep her from resisting, but instead he kept using verbal cues as opposed to any real force. There is no real attack unless you use force. He had a knife an NEVER attempted to use it. That wasn't self defense .. that was two women who beat up an unwilling would-be robber.

Cabbie, cousin knifed by passenger: The attacker robbed the two men at knifepoint and stabbed them before hurling racial slurs at them. | Article from Tulsa World (Tulsa, OK) | HighBeam Research --This one is just like the second one. It took multiple men to subdue one man with a blade. In both examples it was a group effort, not any one man using "wrestling" to save his ass.

TPF: Italian Tourist Fights Off Knife Attack On Upper East Side -- This is the only story where someone actually fought on their own to survive. And in this story she simply resisted. She didn't wrestle or tae-bo the mugger. She simply grabbed the knife and did her best. The mugger's intention was to rob her, not kill her. Otherwise he would have continued until he did kill her.

Like IPON stated earlier, none of your stories made you and Garland's case any stronger. In fact, all you did was type in the words "knife" and "wrestle" into a search engine and you posted what came up. And the fact that you thought that these stories support anything you've said shows that you're completely retarded. We were discussing violence, not intimidation, on an individual level. The stories you gave me might as well have been the Gracie brothers who travel in packs to keep it fair.

You admitted earlier that you put no effort into finding these stories, but what you failed to mention that you just went out and did a homework assignment that UKE gave you like a good little bitch.

DJForest was right ... You can be house broken!

__________________
A solar panel 100 miles by 100 miles (161x161km) in the Mojave Desert (USA) could replace all the coal now burned to generate electricity in the entire U.S.

---

jubaji

Why do you keep bringing up tae-bo? Do you believe Garland practices tae-bo? Are you lying again, you no-class, low-life shitbag?

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

---

TTEscrima

Actually, he tries not to post anything of substance because he can't remember which lie he told last. Boar caught him in a doozy which was erased, here's another case of his lies not adding up, it too will no doubt disappear.

Here is an old post from 2005 when he was lying to Boar about learning as a kid.

Which non chinese arts would you use to augment Post number 9

And here's one from last week:

Kung Fu and MMA post number 216



Looks like he's now using dog years to calculate his BS. And there you have the reason he rarely posts any substance with nearly 9000 posts he can't possibly keep his lies straight. Isn't it interesting he's calling someone else a liar? I don't know about the rest of you, but I "hit the ground" LONG before I was 7, no doubt he'll try to wiggle out of this lie too or try to edit his post again.

---

jubaji

Where is the lie, excrement?

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

---

Dan_The_Man

This is hilarious. 4 pages of shit flinging since yesterday!

Jubaji, your childish name calling is getting a bit old mate, grow up.

It seems that throughout this entire thread we have one half stating that sport arts like BJJ and Muay Thai are not designed, and therefore not effective, for reality based self defence situations. That’s not to say that a Muay Thai fighter will never get out of a mugging or confrontation, he still knows how to throw a punch, but there are so many factors involved in RBSD situations like the mugging in the original article that a Muay Thai class will not prepare you for. Surely we can all agree on this?

The other half just seem set on twisting words to support an utterly pointless argument.

What are we really disputing here? What is the debate? It seems to have turned in to a RBSD Vs Sport Arts. Well, lets just think about that for a second. Which practice is more likely to increase your chances of survival in a mugging? I don’t even need to say it as I think this point has been stressed enough.

And what’s everyone's problem with Uke? He sure as hell is giving a lot more to the debate than most of the name callers in this thread.

---