jubaji

Ok, really one last chance, although everyone knows why you are not answering by now...


...how 'bout you?

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

kingoftheforest

Man know you're into circle jerks too. You're shameless.


Ignorant insecure idiots are people who claim to have used outdated methods against armed foes in a CQC situations.

I jumped into a lake once and didn't get wet too. Your knife fight suplex is about as believable as that keep dreaming you deluded wig wearing, prancing, freak of nature.

You should change your legal name to Suplex Man so everybody will see the stupidity coming.

__________________
The actions one takes are answered by consequences waiting at their conclusion. There are no exceptions.

http://destructionscreation.deviantart.com/gallery/

jubaji

"too"?! "too"?!


Well there it is, a public admission from KOTF!



Wow.

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

kingoftheforest

Your wooden nose gives you away go find Gepetto or your fairy god mother


Maybe the cricket can teach you how to fight???

I answered you already bunny stop being so ignorant...oops never mind thats not possible because you head is way to far up your ass to see light much less reason.

__________________
The actions one takes are answered by consequences waiting at their conclusion. There are no exceptions.

http://destructionscreation.deviantart.com/gallery/

kingoftheforest

You twist shit worse than Brewer you been taking lessons from him?

And as for your PM no I am not really into circle jerks and I don't want to come to yours next Saturday.

Geez

__________________
The actions one takes are answered by consequences waiting at their conclusion. There are no exceptions.

http://destructionscreation.deviantart.com/gallery/

jubaji

So, KOTF has not only come out with his fondness for circle-jerks, but has admitted that despite the talking points that theory-boy made him memorize, he either never carries a knife or has never so much as scratched another human with one. In other words, they are all about a lot of talk that amounts to nothing in terms of what real people in real situations actually rely on in the great majority of cases. They are hiding behind the "ooh, I could cutcha!" because they are physically weak and lacking in skill and experience. A whole gaggle of little theory-boys trying to pose and bluster in the hopes that it will mask their fear and weakness.

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

kingoftheforest

For people who don't like to read I believe this is what the wrasslin stump humper is babbling about over and over.

__________________
The actions one takes are answered by consequences waiting at their conclusion. There are no exceptions.

http://destructionscreation.deviantart.com/gallery/

kingoftheforest

From what I can tell with all your chattering, you grew up in a well off family went to all the right schools, all the right parties, and all the right clubs.

You've never had a 250lbs thug corner you at an ATM breathing down your neck with a knife in his hand. You never got jumped by 5 people because you didn't "belong" some place.

The way you bandy about with questions on things more personal than your afternoon jack off session. You wanna ask if I ever killed anybody or cut anybody boy, but you haven't got the balls to ask so I don't need to acknowledge you. If you're too much of a pussy to ask the first time the right way than piss off.

Talk to yourself I bet your ass has a nice echo.

__________________
The actions one takes are answered by consequences waiting at their conclusion. There are no exceptions.

http://destructionscreation.deviantart.com/gallery/

jubaji

You can stop right there. That's beyond your limit already.

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

jubaji

That's not what I "wanna" ask, that's exactly what I'm asking. Are you really just figuring this out now?

__________________
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your posts.

The_Judo_Jibboo

anywho...
this will probably go unnoticed since the thread has turned into a 3 on 1 sd situation (go jubaji!) but i would just like to point out that the guard was aware of the potential for a weapon to come out, but by the time the guy actually let him catch up it was pretty clear he didn't have one.

__________________
"When the enemy comes, welcome him. When he goes, send him on his way."


So the real message here is that in a SD situation you should always take off your trousers...
-jubaji

BoarSpear

Huh I missed where the Bank Robber was naked and the bank officer (not a guard) had xray vision, nothing was clear, certainly whether or not he had a weapon was PURE assumption. (people have been searched by police and still found to be armed)...so he knew shit about the situation except what he ASSumed

And you didn't read the article, he wasn't a guard..and even said he didn't know if the Bank Robber was armed. "That's when I knew I had to stop him," he said. "I didn't know if he had a weapon or what he was reaching for." But you did apparently feel the need to defend his actions without reading and comprehending the articles content.

The_Judo_Jibboo

well i did read the article, but only when it was first posted almost a week ago. my mistake, i guess in my head "bank employee" and "military police training" got combined up into "bank guard"

This is the part i mainly had in mind when i made the comment though: "Quagliani said he shouted several times for the man to freeze, each time expecting Paris to turn and confront him with a weapon. If he had, Quagliani said, he would have probably backed off."

when the guy reached into his pocket, Quagliani had already "caught up." Considering the sudden shift in strategy from "probably would have backed off" to "That's when i knew i had to stop him," "caught up" must mean that this trained military police officer was confident that he could close the distance before the guy could get his hand out of his pocket (within 14 feet or so right?)

__________________
"When the enemy comes, welcome him. When he goes, send him on his way."


So the real message here is that in a SD situation you should always take off your trousers...
-jubaji

kingoftheforest

If his hand was already in his pocket than it was also on the weapon. Secondly if guy hadn't have been chasing him he wouldn't have needed to reach for the weapon, so the chase still would have endanger people instead of somebody losing some insured money.

Chasing bad guy = him using weapon

__________________
The actions one takes are answered by consequences waiting at their conclusion. There are no exceptions.

http://destructionscreation.deviantart.com/gallery/

BoarSpear

So because the guy hadn't SHOWN the weapon he ASSumed the bank robber didn't have one, Dumb. If it was a knife it wouldn't have made sense to flash it, same goes for a small derringer.

However how the hell does being 14 feet from someone with their hand IN their pocket give a safety illusion!!?
Are you aware of the 21 foot rule? 14 feet is DEAD in the kill zone with no time for you to react...

And Yeah Bank officers ain't cops in ANYWAY shape or form, in fact he should have been aware of Bank policy, which isn't tackling bank robbers empty handed (and GREATLY enhancing the risk of loss to his employers) I assure you.