Well... I've seen enough. Sorry folks. We're done here.
Embelishing fabrications to disparage Jubaji is a waste of cyber space.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kung Fu and MMA
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
You are lying by making statements that are not true, you stupid son of a bitch.Originally posted by pUke View PostHow am I lying? .
I have never claimed 'expertise' in anything but wrestling and have never made any false claims about the amount of training and experience I've had with anything I am in any way familiar with.
So once again, you are a stupid, lying, no-class sack of crap.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pUke View Post
When was the last time anyone had to concentrate to answer a question about something they are supposedly intimate with.
Anytime anyone cared enough about the question or the questioner to take it seriously. Again, this leaves you and anything you say, right out.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't care who jubaji is.Originally posted by Mr. AriesonThis is who you think Jubaji is?
Matt Furey - Zen Master of the Internet
Somehow I don't see it. Self-help gurus are usually pretty nice and positive to other people.
Jubaji claims that I need to "profile" him, when the truth is all I did was comment on what he himself stated about his experience. A wrestler who lived in China that names people he's met as a substitute for training and real experience in order to make it seem like he has experience in other things. He can't discuss anything of real substance because anytime you attempt to go deeper, he can't concentrate then and there and doesn't have the time to focus ... according to him.
I don't have to make this up or assume a thing. Read it for yourself:
When was the last time anyone had to concentrate to answer a question about something they are supposedly intimate with??????? Who drops names of people or places when simply asked "What would you do"?
And by the way Arieson, Furey is just as obnoxious as jubaji. And his grasp on MA isn't much better. They both cling to the idea that its okay to wrestle a knife attacker, and they both think that wrestling gives you all the tools that every other system does.
That's like thinking a .22 pistol can replace a shotgun and a rifle. Jubaji just doesn't get that there are different tools for different jobs.
But he has no problem pretending like that doesn't matter! Ask him how he'll outwrestle 2 or 3 muggers who are armed. Ask him what he'll do on the ground once he's tackled a mugger who has a knife.
The answers may make you laugh out loud.
Leave a comment:
-
As predicted, pUke will not even try to defend his many lies and fabrications.
Leave a comment:
-
I do believe jubarki is upset, he found the time in his busy schedule to post at least once every 15 minutes for several hours straight, busy busy little life he's got. No time for discussion of the arts though he's too busy.
Last edited by TTEscrima; 12-09-2008, 03:43 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm starting to notice a theme here?
time to lock the thread up? Gentlemen... Delete posts?
I hate to "moderate"!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pUke View PostTo jubaji if there's a problem, just wrestle it. If there's a knife, wrestle that too. If there are multiple attackers, you HAVE to run because you can always outrun a street thug because they can't wrestle. If you can't run, throw down the gauntlet and wrestle them all one by one while each mugger waits their turn. Either that or jubaji will promise you that multiple attackers don't exist..
I've never said any of that either, you lying, dim-witted, steaming pile of donkey shit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pUke View PostYou have to believe that with wrestling you can do anything or at least convince other that you believe that because your entire combat dogma is predicated on that silly idea. .
I have never said that, you stupid, shameless, lying bag of pus.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: