Here, here!
I'll second your plea for good accurate knowlege!
Originally posted by Mike Brewer
Great (if a little predictable) answer Tim! I think a lot of the folks, especially here in the JKD (are we still allowed to say that?) forum would agree. However, it bears mentioning that Sijo Lee looked to boxing to fill in the gaps and deficiencies he felt existed in Wing Chun, yes? His training methods (heavy bag, skipping rope, focus mitts, the way he advocated sparring, and even his beginning position and footwork) came from studies and observations of boxing, didn't they?
Of course, I would have to agree that he did something remarkable in that he drew those training methods and concepts out of the simple realm of pure fisticuffs and showed how it applied across all the ranges. I also feel (intuitively, as I have no real way of knowing) that it may have been his observations of boxing - maybe even his brief Hong Kong experience with the sport - that influenced his stressing the preliminary conditioning of boxers as opposed to the less dynamic methods of more traditional martial arts.
Of course, we all have a great opportunity to learn from you as to whether or not I'm completely full of horse poop, since everything I just wrote is pure speculative personal opinion and you, after all, were there in the beginning.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I would sincerely love to hear what you have to say on the matter as someone who saw JKD develop firsthand. If you'd be so kind as to entertain the request here, I for one would be eternally grateful.
Respectfully,
Mike Brewer
PS: I realize your post was written with the intent to point people a the obvious, and I didn't mean to kill the humor. I just saw a great opportunity to ask a question I've always wanted to ask.
Of course, I would have to agree that he did something remarkable in that he drew those training methods and concepts out of the simple realm of pure fisticuffs and showed how it applied across all the ranges. I also feel (intuitively, as I have no real way of knowing) that it may have been his observations of boxing - maybe even his brief Hong Kong experience with the sport - that influenced his stressing the preliminary conditioning of boxers as opposed to the less dynamic methods of more traditional martial arts.
Of course, we all have a great opportunity to learn from you as to whether or not I'm completely full of horse poop, since everything I just wrote is pure speculative personal opinion and you, after all, were there in the beginning.

Respectfully,
Mike Brewer
PS: I realize your post was written with the intent to point people a the obvious, and I didn't mean to kill the humor. I just saw a great opportunity to ask a question I've always wanted to ask.
I'll second your plea for good accurate knowlege!

Comment