Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tang soo do or wing chun kung fu

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by IPON
    Actually, yes I am now convinced. This is the only statement you have made that I believe.
    in an actual fight, you can make yourself like that, you can modify yourself but you cannot modify your opponent's kungfu achievements.....

    i now truely understand that you have a very very low knowledge in martial arts,

    in this forum, whatever questions you all thrown to me - i did reply just like in a true fighting..... all of you fists is all i intercept - cause in kungfu - defensive mechanism is first priority to emphasize.

    all the question i have ask you and all of the non-kungfu guys here cannot defend their dis-advantages regarding of thier non-kungfu art for a main possible reason.... and that is the LIMITATION OF THEIR TECHNIQUE.... they only defend the questions regarding to their art dis-advantages that i thrown by saying "BullShit", "What drugs did you take", and things like that....

    in short, it really prove me that even there (outside the Philippines) non-kungfu martial art is really STUPID!!!! I think stupid non-kungfu art is only found here in the Philippines but mostly there in yours.....

    even when i watch K1 and UFC, shit.... it is really a stupid fight, no defensive moves, the ratio of hit is 50:50

    Yesterday, i am lucky to spar with a submission wrestling (a friend of a friend of mine), the ratio of hit is 1:30
    That submission wrestler hit me once while he's on my back and grappled me before i hit him 30 times to his main cavities......

    Note:
    in a true fight, i already defeat him 30 times before he can defeat me only once.....

    CONVINCED?????

    now, defend this not using stupid text on the keyboard.....

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by jubaji
      You have never been in a street fight. The only fight you have ever been in is your obvious struggle with reality. Freak!
      then why does astronauts who first steps unto the moon and the Spirit and Opportunity Mission Mars Rovers - all of them successfully with a billion dollar project - successfully landed with no scratch??????

      prior to launch - they only train thru Simulation or Computer Simulation - and a one-way-ticket-drive - success!!!!!

      simulation like sparring with no rules outside the ring and the ratio of hit is 2:22 (assuming that all hand strikes thrown are all powerful, important thing to remember)

      you could not prove yourself good by winning thousand of trophies in a ringfight with plenty or few of stupid rules.

      CONVINCED??????

      i have never been in a street fight cause in kungfu - the higher the kungfu you learn - the more patience you are in fight.

      A Good Lesson for you today:
      If you fight and win in a thousands of battles is no good
      It is better to win a battle without fighting.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by sherwinc
        i now truely understand that you have a very very low knowledge in martial arts
        You are certainly intitled to your opinions, mine are based on experience and application yours on psychotic episodes but I still respect your delusions.

        Interesting, a person makes a post about what to look for in an instructor and your response "ONLY KUNG FU IS GOOD" but you don't answer the question. You constanly speak of the superiority of Wing Chun, while "we" practioners of wing chun appreciate this, when we discuss the shortcommings based on experience you say "YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND KUNG FU" when in reality you have never studied wing chun.

        Why did I insult you, becuase I felt I should do what you always do.......post something that is completely unrelated to the topic. Most of the experienced people here speak of teh short commings of all styles not just kung fu I thought you understood that.

        Maybe you need to jump off the kung fu band wagon and look at reality. I generally have respect for all MAs that equivalent of BB or higher for their accomplishment. However, very few people that I respect for fighting ability and application of the art. I have studied many styles with a but no one style defines me. My friend I suggest wake up about the reality of fighting WOW you hit the guy 30 times....it obviously had not effect (translation) 30 puches no power, 1 throw hard concrete full power CONVINCED!!!

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by sherwinc
          A Good Lesson for you today:
          If you fight and win in a thousands of battles is no good
          It is better to win a battle without fighting.

          Actually I do finally agree with you...in theory. The problem is you make assumptions and are telling people that have applied these techniques they are wrong becuase it is not like the 1-2 types of kung fu you have studied know that there are thousands of styles of kungfu.

          That statement is also a convienent excuse for not addressing the shrtcommings of you style.

          Say what you want a bout a ring fighter, but they are in top physical condition and are really using technique. granted there are rules but what they are doing is far closer to reality than anything you are doing ....CONVINCED!!!!

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by IPON
            My friend I suggest wake up about the reality of fighting WOW you hit the guy 30 times....it obviously had not effect (translation) 30 puches no power, 1 throw hard concrete full power CONVINCED!!!
            How about if you can throw 30 punches hard concrete full power before your opponent hit you a full hard concrete power also but only once????

            Note:
            before your opponent can hit you only once he's already dead....

            CONVINCED?????

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by IPON
              Actually I do finally agree with you...in theory. The problem is you make assumptions and are telling people that have applied these techniques they are wrong becuase it is not like the 1-2 types of kung fu you have studied know that there are thousands of styles of kungfu.

              That statement is also a convienent excuse for not addressing the shrtcommings of you style.

              Say what you want a bout a ring fighter, but they are in top physical condition and are really using technique. granted there are rules but what they are doing is far closer to reality than anything you are doing ....CONVINCED!!!!
              how can it become closer to reality if there are stupid rules?????

              sparring outside the ring with the 1st dan black belt shorin ryu karate, black belt of Tae Kwon Do, experienced barrio boxer, is really a more closer to reality cause it is a friendly match even though hard hitting.... and it is our way of life here.....

              after sparring, we count how many bruises, scratch, dust marks on the dress made by kicking shoes - to know how many points did we make. (in order to count the ratio of hit points cause we have no referree)

              CONVINCED?????

              Comment


              • #52
                Lighten up Man!!

                Originally posted by sherwinc
                How about if you can throw 30 punches hard concrete full power before your opponent hit you a full hard concrete power also but only once????

                Note:
                before your opponent can hit you only once he's already dead....

                CONVINCED?????

                Well if was dead how could he hit you once.... you must be really slow. The point is also not necessarily to kill of be killed this actually shows your undersatanding of warrior philosophy.

                Look, are you interested in learning about MAs or are you only interested in repating that nothing can beat kung fu in your opinion. I am a great believer in kung fu but I also belive in reality more. You cankeep stating "this is better than that" is especially when you have very limited experince with other styles and their training. You have the right to your opinions but you should be open to learn and change those opinions if necessary. evry style has flaws if not every style would win, even if you could create a flwaless style humans are inherantly flawed so the system would still be flawed.

                Now back to the point of teh thread what do you know about Tang Soo Do?

                Oh, and so I am not criticized for not answering questions here is my answer: If you can hit 30:1 with power and accuracy I would say you are fighting a blind hemaplegic with hemmorroids

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by sherwinc
                  sparring outside the ring with the 1st dan black belt shorin ryu karate, black belt of Tae Kwon Do, experienced barrio boxer, is really a more closer to reality cause it is a friendly match even though hard hitting.... and it is our way of life here.....CONVINCED?????

                  just as you said key words friendly and sparring. The goal isn't to knock your head off boxers have died in teh ring though it is a sport. My point is that you need to develop some repect for these athletes and thier training and do not be so quick to dismiss something beciuse it is differnt.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by IPON
                    just as you said key words friendly and sparring. The goal isn't to knock your head off boxers have died in teh ring though it is a sport. My point is that you need to develop some repect for these athletes and thier training and do not be so quick to dismiss something beciuse it is differnt.

                    you forgot something.....

                    CONVINCED.!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by sherwinc

                      i have never been in a street fight cause

                      ...'cause they keep a close eye on you at the 'institute' and don't let you linger near the other patients.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by IPON
                        Well if was dead how could he hit you once.... you must be really slow.
                        it is only an expression for a kungfu can hit many times before a non-kungfu can hit. Non-kungfu just relies on their Speed, Stamina, Technique, Power, Force, Lucky but their dis-advantages is, they have no Sensitivity Training, Neutralizing, Chi, Jing, Iron Skin, Unfathomable Hand/Feet Techniques, Coiling, Clawing like Eagles Claw, Hooking like Mantis, Traumatic Fists like those of Leopard, Machine Gun rapids hands attacks like those of ChiDianBun and WingChun, Using of Rear/Ground/or other Obstacles as an advantage.

                        Note:
                        why i include Using of Rear/Ground/or other Obstacles as an advantage???? Because in TaiChi, once they see a corner wall obstacles at your back, they normally push you in order for you to hit your own back to that wall, or if there is no corner wall at your back, the taichi saw a pointed stone at ground behind your back, the taichi stamp his feet unto your foot then he still push you in order for you to hit your own back to that pointed stone in the ground..... there are plenty of techniques in KungFu that you dont understand......

                        Originally posted by IPON
                        Look, are you interested in learning about MAs or are you only interested in repating that nothing can beat kung fu in your opinion. I am a great believer in kung fu but I also belive in reality more. You cankeep stating "this is better than that" is especially when you have very limited experince with other styles and their training. You have the right to your opinions but you should be open to learn and change those opinions if necessary. evry style has flaws if not every style would win, even if you could create a flwaless style humans are inherantly flawed so the system would still be flawed.
                        i already hide my flaws that is the reason why kungfu doesnt joint in a ring tournament, the reason why is not to expose their flaws..... and kungfu doesnt want to expose their advance kata cause even me - i can simple know maybe 50% of its weakness thru its advance kata..... convinced????


                        Originally posted by IPON
                        Now back to the point of teh thread what do you know about Tang Soo Do?

                        Oh, and so I am not criticized for not answering questions here is my answer: If you can hit 30:1 with power and accuracy I would say you are fighting a blind hemaplegic with hemmorroids

                        Tang Soo Do? it is the martial arts of Chuck Norris, tang soo do karate, and it is still a category of karate, and karate is a waste of time.... now if karate is stupid then tae kwon do is the worst.....


                        CONVINCED?????

                        HAW HAW HAW

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          This is the funniest thread of the year.

                          sherwinc - I take my hat off to you. You get laughs at ratio of 20:2. You best troll on this island, and I love you long time, 10 dollar.

                          CONVINCED!!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Thai Bri
                            This is the funniest thread of the year.

                            sherwinc - I take my hat off to you. You get laughs at ratio of 20:2. You best troll on this island, and I love you long time, 10 dollar.

                            CONVINCED!!
                            for me, if not depends upon the practitioner's inborn talent, there is always a superior style regarding other styles of martial arts.....

                            like....

                            there are always best software compare to other softwares

                            for example:
                            how can a windows3.1 or windows 95 beat the windows98?????

                            CONVINCED?????

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Outstanding troll. Roy Gaflear couldn't do better.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                I'm not sure, but I think I'm now officially CONVINCED!!!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X