Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting facts about founder

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting facts about founder

    Just a little something i came across. This is an old review on general choi's encyclopedia by someone in the U.S. Just something for all those people who think they know it all about TKD

    Encyclopedia of Taekwondo. Choi Hong Hi. International Taekwondo Federation, 1983. Choi Hong Hi is the most controversial figure in Taekwondo, as well as one of the most self-promoting. His Encyclopedia is his life work, he says, in chronicling the development of Taekwondo. Actually, it is Choi's attempt to rewrite and obscure history at virtually every turn. Choi claims, for instance, to have realized that Korea needed a martial art distinct from Karate. He had earned a 2nd Dan in Karate while in Japan, and set about, he says, in the late 1940's to develop Taekwondo. To do this, he claims he invented over 3,000 techniques.

    Oddly, almost all of them look like Karate techniques. He leaves the
    impression that his many visits to the International Olympic Committee led to
    recognition of the ITF as the sole international governing body for Taekwondo.

    He admits his enthusiasm for Taekwondo in "socialist" countries; he doesn't
    mention his son's conviction in Canada as a North Korean agent implicated in assassination attempts on South Korean officials. There are a lot of just plain odd things in his writings. He admits a tremendous pride and relief at finishing his Encyclopedia in 1985. It was published in 1983. He begins his Encyclopedia with a bitter attack on just about everyone, including
    Japanese Karate masters. Everyone in the South Korean army were enemies. The South Korean government was his enemy. He claims an "ever increasing list of enemies" [his own words at p. 8, vol. I]. Among many unlikely propositions, he claims he convinced Mas Oyama to change his Kyokushinkai Karate style to ITF Taekwondo, even though Oyama never publicly evidenced any such intention, and it didn't happen.

    Choi shares no credit for the development or propagation of modern Taekwondo with anyone. Most of Choi's close associates have left him over the years, and the vast bulk of formerly ITF instructors have either changed to the WTF, or become independent, and this Encyclopedia shows why: Choi is paranoid, egomaniacal, and not well connected to reality.

    The Encyclopedia is not so much a martial art reference as a psychological study of its author, and it is a deeply disturbing portrait.


  • #2
    Dear Sir...

    Sir,

    I wish to thank you for your utterly brilliant use of words!

    Might I inquire as to how many conversations you have had with the General or any of his higher ranking students? Also, where can I reference some of your rightings that you did during your studies of post occupation Korea?

    You had so much to say, I just want to read more...

    Speeking of PROPAGANDA!!!!!

    TAEKWON!
    Spookey

    Comment


    • #3
      hey spook,read the beginning of the thread. its an article popit lockit came across. He didnt write the thing so why attack him? Everyone thinks they know general choi and hes this perfect master. the truth is this is not the first ive read about him in a negative way. The guy who wrote this obviously did some research into korea and tkd origins. Why else would he have been writing a review on it? the way general choi promotes people its not hard to bump into and speak to a high ranking student. They r freakn everywhere.

      Comment


      • #4
        I laugh at all the TKD people who think Choi invented something, he didn't so get over it. Funakoshi sensei who is responsible for the art Choi did study, never made the claims that Choi did. But the rewritting of history is typical of many Korean arts. Sad because there is so much good in them.

        Comment


        • #5
          Dear Electro...

          Sir,

          Either one of two things happened when Poppit made his post...either he plagiarised someone elses works without crediting the author, or he made his own comments (those to which I responded)...

          If you were simply copying something you read, the write was an idiot also. How many people end a thesis with a



          TAEKWON!
          Spookey

          Comment


          • #6
            come on spook, obviously the smiley face is added by popit and lockit. But he says in his post "Just a little something i came across. This is an old review on general choi's encyclopedia by someone in the U.S." why wouldnt he just say this is his thoughts on the book instead. what makes the reviewer an idiot? the reviewer obviously knows a bit about the subject.

            Comment


            • #7
              Electro...

              Hey Electro,


              I was stating that only an idiot would write a thesis on a serious subject then end the closing sentence with that type of punctuation ( )...

              It was merely a joke...However, I have a few questions for the author or anyone that agrees with that post in its totality...

              1. What is the problem with people in Socialist countries?

              2. Does Choi Hong Hi not contribute the assistance of Nam Tae Hi and others with the creation of the Chang Hon Patterns

              3. And in regards to the comment "everyone in the South Korean Army were enemies"...based on the number of assasinations of RoK Military and Political figures...does that comment really seem far fetched?

              TAEKWON!
              Spookey

              Comment


              • #8
                The problem with the review of the encyclopedia is that it's more a review of Choi than his set of books. If the reviewer has an axe to grind with Choi then let him grind, if he has problems with the encyclopedia then spell out the problems. I'm not a fan of Choi but I respect some of the things he did accomplish.

                Comment

                Working...
                X