Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MT beginner thinking of switching to TKD-wants advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tom Yum
    replied
    Originally posted by JStinson View Post
    Yes, true. These schools are very common, but the funny thing is they come and go. The traditional schools that promote quality black belts will stay around.
    True.

    Originally posted by JStinson View Post
    As for the self teaching, I can see we will just agree to disagree. By the way, are you self taught?
    95% of what I've learned has been through an instructor in either a class or privates.

    The remainder has been through picking up some new stuff on my own, then eventually taking it to someone who can work with it.
    Last edited by Tom Yum; 02-15-2007, 05:37 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JStinson
    replied
    Yes, true. These schools are very common, but the funny thing is they come and go. The traditional schools that promote quality black belts will stay around.

    As for the self teaching, I can see we will just agree to disagree. By the way, are you self taught?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom Yum
    replied
    Originally posted by JStinson View Post
    I myself do not attempt to do a new technique without seeking the advice of someone superior to me that know the intricate details of the movement. To many people think they can just learn to do anything and then pass it off as true martial arts then teach this to other students. This is why 90% of martial art schools promote sorry students that do not know proper technique. What will martial arts look like 5 generations from now. I am doing my best to teach as I have been taught and instill into my students the importance to keep martial arts true and not teach gymnastics and weak sport techniques.
    Sorry, stepping down from the soapbox.
    J Stinson
    That's great, sir. I'm glad that you teach your students the real deal, rather than gymnastics and weak point-sparring techniques. If I ran a martial arts school, I would feel the same way.

    Another reason why schools promote students with sloppy technique also has to do with the business side of operating an MA school and the trade off of collecting fees vs. making better students in the long run.

    Learning from videos alone is not a substitute for expert instruction, but it can give you an idea of how to do the technique if you have previous experience. And as you've pointed out, you can come across stylistic differences.

    I would recommend against someone without any experience to try and learn any martial art system with a video.
    Last edited by Tom Yum; 02-14-2007, 04:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JStinson
    replied
    People often think they can self teach, and one can to an extent. Let's say someone wants to learn how to do a certain spinning kick. They can go get a book and see about 3-4 pictures of the kick and read about 5-6 sentences on the kick. Not plausible. They can watch someone do this at a tournament or on a video, fine, but are you sure your balance, timing, foot placement, angle of attack, body placement, center of gravity, (do I need to go on) is correct??? The mechanics of one style is not the same across the board in another art. Chung Do Kwan was invented by a student of Shotokan, so they should look similar, somewhat yes, but the philosophy of the motion is different which means they are not the same.

    I myself do not attempt to do a new technique without seeking the advice of someone superior to me that know the intricate details of the movement. To many people think they can just learn to do anything and then pass it off as true martial arts then teach this to other students. This is why 90% of martial art schools promote sorry students that do not know proper technique. What will martial arts look like 5 generations from now. I am doing my best to teach as I have been taught and instill into my students the importance to keep martial arts true and not teach gymnastics and weak sport techniques.
    Sorry, stepping down from the soapbox.
    J Stinson

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom Yum
    replied
    Originally posted by JStinson
    If a school advertises they can get you to a black belt in X amount of years, watch out. Everyone trains and progresses at a different pace, anything less than 4 years is bull. Avoid contracts period, most of the ones with contracts are doing that to keep people in the school instead of teaching good technique to keep the students there.
    True.

    Originally posted by JStinson
    When you go to a school, don't just look at the white belts, look at the black belts, if they are fumbling around, hit the door.Be weary of the instructor, ask them about their rank and their certifications, if they cannot show you, they are probably not legit. You can always tell how hard an instructor trained by how hard he trains his students.
    You are correct, sir. I forgot to mention that not all white belts are beginners in the martial arts - so checking out the black belts are even more important.


    Originally posted by JStinson
    Sorry, I don't agree with teaching yourself TKD kicks. I have had numerous people come through my door that have been "self trained," they all looked pretty much the same, awful. You need the advice of a professional to show you the mechanics of the kick to get maximum effectiveness with minimum effort. That come only from people with an understanding of the techniques. A front kick looks simple from the untrained eye, but the body mechanics involved are quite complex.
    It depends. I think those who already have a good deal of experience in one system, can self-train in another system that is slightly different.

    For example, I think it would be easier for a 1st dan in shotokan karate to learn TKD on his own, especially if he's competed against them. He already has a good grasp of body mechanics and balance.

    I agree, that self-training is bad for those who do not have experience and that usually their techniques are sloppy or lack power.

    Bowing to your experience here.

    Leave a comment:


  • MT beginner thinking of switching to TKD-wants advice

    Hi folks,

    Please, first of all, I don't want this to turn into another retarded "my style can kick your style's ass" debacle. I believe all arts deserve respect and anyone who achieves his or her potential in their chosen art is a hero.

    OK, here goes. I started studying Muay Thai a few months back. I chose MT because It's a beautiful art in it's traditional and purest form, effective, straight forward. Another reason I chose it over all other arts is the emphasis on conditioning as I'm a conditioning fanatic.

    So anyway, my school changed curriculum and blended MT into a self defense program invented by the school director. Quality, pure MT instruction is hard to come by where I live. As a result, I started looking at other styles and am totally impressed by the TKD olympic sparring I saw, very inspiring. I'd love to work my way up to that style of sparring. I can also see where TKD may almost be as intense with conditioning as MT. I am considering a switch. . . . . not committed to the change, but I am open to checking out another option.

    Now, here's where I put myself at risk of making enemies on the TKD board, which is NOT my intention. Reputation has it that many TKD schools are watered down, I believe the term many use is "mcdojo". Where I live, there is a TKD school on every block it seems!

    My question is this: How does a prospective TKD student pick a quality school with quality instruction and avoid McDojo syndrome? Which organizations should I look toward (ATA? ITF? WTF?) and which ones should I avoid. Or are the best schools NOT affiliated at all? What questions should I ask? What do I look for?

    Insight? Opinions? Wisdom? I welcome yours.
Working...
X