Originally posted by kanik
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TKD flaws....
Collapse
X
-
...Groundfighting? You disgust me. Haha!Originally posted by Huntley View PostIf you was the founding father of TKD and you looked down from the heaven and see how TKD is today and had the power from GOD, what would you do to those that have changed your Art and how would you correct it?
I would add more Hapkido and Groundfighting.
Well! First I would make all the people who have watered it down, weakened it, and turned it into a sport instead of a martial art, swim across an ocean of thumbtacks, and then I'd make them swim across an ocean of salt disolved in lemon juice.
I would bring the style back closer to its original roots of Taekkyun and Karate, and I would make it so that training is hard, not a waste of time.
Leave a comment:
-
Every Martial art has it's flaws. The real problem is, people relate TKD with sport TKD which is totally different. Traditional TKD has low kicks, strikes to the groin, and a lot of other really practical techniques. On the other hand, sport TKD....not so much. I would say though, grappling could be a problem, but still, if you can use your head, you will be fine.
Leave a comment:
-
As usual these discussions are just as interesting for what they reveal about how a question responded to was understood to begin with.Originally posted by eXcessiveForceMy exposure to kali is limited. So I wouldn't want to base any statements on the little bit of exposure I have had.
Of the others I have multiple experiences to know that my comments are wide spread
I remember watching on of Lamar Davis's video, granted it was old, but the knife defense would get you killed.
It just goes to show though, every system has it's issues, especially one that has been around for a long time.
In my mind JKD is the devastating martial art Lee himself was known for, prior to and outside of his movie JKD - that potential rather than the slap-fest/dead patterns joke many have turned it into. Likewise with Kali the martial art it once was, still is, though in the hands of very few.
I have to wonder sometimes what those who "play act" these arts that were once so alive, so reality based, must be thinking as they pretend to spar, etc. Not to demean these people, I just wonder what it is they must be believing they are doing.
I mean, take the following clip.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg9qx1I1OzA[/YOUTUBE]
These two guys may believe they are expressing JKD, Bruce Lee picture and all, but watching it I cannot help recall that scene in "Fist of Fury."
Where Lee's character, walks into what is purportedly a Judo school, Jigoro Kano picture and all, and basically wipes the floor with it's head instructors - as much Hollywood as it was his point about what happens when the original founder's martial art's core principles are lost sight of.
On that note, who knew he was fortelling JKD's own future, Bruce Lee picture on the wall and all!
To those of you on this forum who truly practice JKD, who have not followed that "pretend JKD" path, I commend you. We may not have always seen eye to eye on this forum. Still, I'm sure that were your art's founder to walk in on one of your training sessions, he'd break out into one of those sunny smiles of his.
As Lee used to say, "may it go well with you, my friend...."
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedGiven my experiences, I think there are some very fair points in there.Originally posted by Maxx View PostJeet Kune Do: There seem to be two schools of thought here. Those schools who train people to fight and those that teach technique more or less. Many practitioners, especially from Europe seem to be very highly technically developed in their jun fan based trapping but couldn't fight off a band of 5th graders if it came down to it. I also run into a lot of people who don't seem to have any wind or do contact sparring.
one other thing that just occurred to me is the certification problem in JKD. I've come across a large number of "instructors" who are "certified" who barely know how to apply Pak Sao or Lop Sao, much less anything else. These people are sometimes certified by well known JKD figureheads either through seminars or intense weekend training programs and are then given certs.
Kali, I think is a incredible weapons art, but I don't run across that many people in Kali who are good empty hand fighters unless they have cross trained in another system. Also, I've found a lot of practitioners who are very good at the various drills such as Hubud or Countra Sumbrada that can pull of some amazing things out of the drills but have no real world fighting experience. Some of the techniques are also questionable as well. I did a little training under a high ranked instructor in Lameco Escrima about 10 years ago and some of the stuff he was trying to pass off as knife defense made me a little nervous.
Good post.
Leave a comment:
-
I think that find 5 flaws would be difficult for any one of the martial arts that I named including TKD. I was, however, not making reference to the arts as much as I was the individual schools that teach these systems. Aside from that I would list a few common flaws I have seen from school to school that teach each of the arts that I've listed above. Do keep in mind that I am not bashing any of these systems, I am merely pointing out weaknesses in the way that I generally see them taught.Originally posted by Liberty View PostIt's telling that you did not name what those flaws are in Muay Thai (other than it's lack of a counter-ground game), JKD and Kali. Care to name at least five for each (Karate flaws would basically be all the above, shoot and BJJ, lacking in the stand up aspect). I'm curious as to what you'd come up with.
Here's a hand up - Kali's movement principles apply just as well empty handed as on the ground - what's left? And good luck finding flaws in JKD's well-rounded game.
Muay Thai: As mentioned before, no ground game, but I also do run across a large number of practitioners who don't know how to shield leg kicks or body kicks well. I also do run into the occasional school that does not spar. Elbows also seem to be dissappearing from the general american curriculum as are a large number of knee strikes you would generally see.
Jeet Kune Do: There seem to be two schools of thought here. Those schools who train people to fight and those that teach technique more or less. Many practitioners, especially from Europe seem to be very highly technically developed in their jun fan based trapping but couldn't fight off a band of 5th graders if it came down to it. I also run into a lot of people who don't seem to have any wind or do contact sparring.
one other thing that just occurred to me is the certification problem in JKD. I've come across a large number of "instructors" who are "certified" who barely know how to apply Pak Sao or Lop Sao, much less anything else. These people are sometimes certified by well known JKD figureheads either through seminars or intense weekend training programs and are then given certs.
Kali, I think is a incredible weapons art, but I don't run across that many people in Kali who are good empty hand fighters unless they have cross trained in another system. Also, I've found a lot of practitioners who are very good at the various drills such as Hubud or Countra Sumbrada that can pull of some amazing things out of the drills but have no real world fighting experience. Some of the techniques are also questionable as well. I did a little training under a high ranked instructor in Lameco Escrima about 10 years ago and some of the stuff he was trying to pass off as knife defense made me a little nervous.
Keep in mind, I personally see these flaws as being the product of the school and instructor at that school, not the art itself. The 3 martial arts (or martial philosophies if you will) are all comprehensive in their own way and are very respectable systems.
My personal opinion though is that TKD is just as respectable as any one of the systems above. It is just as comprehensive if you look at it on paper. General Choi wrote an entire encyclopedia set on the art covering every aspect from punching, kicking, throwing, self defense, grappling, etc. Some instructors choose to teach all aspects of the system... most don't, and that's sad.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedThere is a functional core to Kali that forms perhaps less than 10% of the art, and it is in my belief the most effective method I have studied, for a specific purpose. I trust the lives of Soldiers and Police Officers to it.
Then there is the other 90% or so that tends to penetrate the public domain, which to be honest falls purely within the category of recreational training.
The mistake of many students, and certain instructors, is to confuse the two.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedThank you sir.Originally posted by eXcessiveForceWe'd love to have you come and you are always welcome.
We have fun and I'm sure we could learn a lot from you.
I'm speaking with the great Mike B on my plans Stateside, it would be great to come down and mix it up.
we'll stay in touch
Leave a comment:
-
Whoops - my bad - neglected to qualify what I meant by JKD - oh wait a minute, I did qualify it - "JKD's well-rounded game."
Believe me, not even the last thing on my mind was the McJKD mess Lee's martial art has been turned into by far too many.
I was thinking of folks like Lamar Davis, Matt Thornton, et al - guys who train themselves and their students an all around game - the mitts, the realistic sparring, stand up, the ground, escapes, think hit, the interval stuff, the nutrition, etc. Guys in the traditon of Lee's 'every part of your body" - not the mass of clowns out there that "play JKD." Some of the simple, direct, non-classical people on here, for that matter.
Say, you didn't pick on Kali. Some of those old guys, man, put a knife in their hands and forget the all around - devastating little dudes with those angles!
Say, is this the right forum for this one - LOL!
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedI hear you. A ring sport....and we don't spar. Been to those schools, they got some mean pad drills......and.......
In terms of JKD, to be frank, the worst thing that ever happened to JKD was seminars. 200 - 300 people, who cant spar or condition because it ain't in the disclaimer.
Thats why I teach out of my garage, for free, and everyone who walks in the door understands that we mix it up. If you don't like it.....what do you want, your money back???
I know you train largely via sparring, which is just the best way to go, hope to maybe come and learn from your group when I come over to the States next year.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedyou see its odd, I can't relate any of those critiques to the JKD and Muay Thai I have studied. I could provide other weaknesses, for sure, but it just goes to show that each individual teacher passes on their expression of the art, surpassing the art, and defining the individual instead..
....which is JKD
Leave a comment:
-
It's telling that you did not name what those flaws are in Muay Thai (other than it's lack of a counter-ground game), JKD and Kali. Care to name at least five for each (Karate flaws would basically be all the above, shoot and BJJ, lacking in the stand up aspect). I'm curious as to what you'd come up with.Originally posted by Maxx View PostInteresting. I don't think I've ever been in a TKD school which had all of those flaws, but every single martial art school I have been in had some of them. Whether it be TKD, Karate, muay thai, BJJ, shooto, Jeet Kune Do, Kali... no art or method of training is perfect.
Those people who are unhappy with their training at a particular school can move on and find something more challenging and more in line with their personal needs. Those who are happy and are having their needs met by their current instructor can stay right where they are.
Here's a hand up - Kali's movement principles apply just as well empty handed as on the ground - what's left? And good luck finding flaws in JKD's well-rounded game.
Leave a comment:
-
Interesting. I don't think I've ever been in a TKD school which had all of those flaws, but every single martial art school I have been in had some of them. Whether it be TKD, Karate, muay thai, BJJ, shooto, Jeet Kune Do, Kali... no art or method of training is perfect.Originally posted by bodhisattva View PostWhat good is it doing if it is exposing people to martial arts training that will get them beat up?
Punching from the hip
Initiating attacks with the feet
Initiating attacks with the rear hand
Blocking out in front of the body with the arms extended
Using the arms/hands to defend the groin
Deep and wide stances
Footwork that doesn'twork
No punching to the face
Depending primarily on kicks
Massive emphasis on worthless Kata
Sparring rules that make people WORSE fighters, not better fighters
No groundfighting
Few (if any) throws
Standing joint locks
"Weird" methods of attack that no one really even undersatnds or utilizes (the Psuedo or whatever it was called is a good example)
"Snap" kicks
Almost TOTAL LACK OF EVASIVE techniques
Flat-footed stances
god, and that's the short list! It is BACKWARDS and SCREWED UP and no amount of "Your way is good, My way is also good" mentality will change that.
I think TKD is one of the most fraudulent industries in the country, next to Fast Food (because they don't actually sell food) and Insurance (the world's biggest, most f'd up racket ever..)
TKD isn't even a good choice for fitness reasons - ANY good cardio/weights program would outdo TKD by a long shot in that arena.
And I think people in "kickbox aerobics" classes get better fighting information, and believe me, most of those classes are horrible.
--
People can say I'm flaming the art, but this is what I really believe. And for good reason. I gave TKD instructors my money, and in the end, they lied to me.
They basically sold me a revolver full of rust, and told me it would help me protect myself.
When in truth, if anyone fires that revolver, they are more than likely to get metal shrapnel in their own face when the damned thing blows up in their hand.
Those people who are unhappy with their training at a particular school can move on and find something more challenging and more in line with their personal needs. Those who are happy and are having their needs met by their current instructor can stay right where they are.
Leave a comment:
-
Shit - so much for that theory! Dammit!
[YOUTUBE]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IHlKlWCQemY[/YOUTUBE]
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: