This is the first double thread thingy. O.k......
First topic
How would Kimura and Helio do in modern mma? I think Kimura would do great if he practiced more without a gi. A rarely known fact is that he fought a vale tudo match with Waldemear Santana, the other man who beat Helio. He beat him in a sport jiu-jitsu match and then drew with him in vale tudo. Kimura probaly would have won the fight but he slipped during the throw and was attacked by Waldemear with punches and three headbutts and on the fourth he peformed a atemi waza strike bloodying Waldemear. They then fought to a draw. Kimura was at an unfair advantage during his fight because of his age. Kimura throwing schools would often give students concussions, his groundwork was better than Helio, and he was a decent striker. I believe he would have done well in todays mma world. Carlson Gracie has beat Waldemear and drawn with him but was closer to his age. Carlson has trained some of the best fighters in the world. He grew up in the golden age of the vt aspect of BJJ and he had good striking skills despite not crosstraining. I believe he would also do good.
Topic 2
Can someone tell me the main differences between the old judo and new. I know a few differences.
1.Old Judo had better groundwork. Helio even said he didn't changed any techniques but just preserved them and made them better.
2.Striking was more of a part of judo. The strategy of BJJ fighters in mma is disturbingly similar to Maedas plan even though Helio claimed Maeda never taught him strikes. The strategy of using a low kick to close the distance is the same thing Maeda did in his mma fights.
3.In the article Helio Gracie Potrait of a master by Don Beu it said Helio did not learn the "current contest-oriented judo but an earlier form with an emphasis on the goshin-no-kata self defense forms."
First topic
How would Kimura and Helio do in modern mma? I think Kimura would do great if he practiced more without a gi. A rarely known fact is that he fought a vale tudo match with Waldemear Santana, the other man who beat Helio. He beat him in a sport jiu-jitsu match and then drew with him in vale tudo. Kimura probaly would have won the fight but he slipped during the throw and was attacked by Waldemear with punches and three headbutts and on the fourth he peformed a atemi waza strike bloodying Waldemear. They then fought to a draw. Kimura was at an unfair advantage during his fight because of his age. Kimura throwing schools would often give students concussions, his groundwork was better than Helio, and he was a decent striker. I believe he would have done well in todays mma world. Carlson Gracie has beat Waldemear and drawn with him but was closer to his age. Carlson has trained some of the best fighters in the world. He grew up in the golden age of the vt aspect of BJJ and he had good striking skills despite not crosstraining. I believe he would also do good.
Topic 2
Can someone tell me the main differences between the old judo and new. I know a few differences.
1.Old Judo had better groundwork. Helio even said he didn't changed any techniques but just preserved them and made them better.
2.Striking was more of a part of judo. The strategy of BJJ fighters in mma is disturbingly similar to Maedas plan even though Helio claimed Maeda never taught him strikes. The strategy of using a low kick to close the distance is the same thing Maeda did in his mma fights.
3.In the article Helio Gracie Potrait of a master by Don Beu it said Helio did not learn the "current contest-oriented judo but an earlier form with an emphasis on the goshin-no-kata self defense forms."
Comment