You're missing the point...
You guys are really missing a major point here. You are not going to head into the eye of the storm and come out unscathed. A little guy (like myself being only 5'8" and having no muscle mass) cannot defeat a larger attacker by wrestling with his mass. Doing judo throws are going to get you killed. I don't care how much you think you understand about off-balancing. You aren't going to defeat him in a grappling match on the ground either (I know we're in the BJJ forum, sorry).
Frequenty, our school is contracted to help with the training of members of the "3 B world" as I call it: Body Guards, Bouncers, and Bounty Hunters. These dudes we work with are routinely well over 6 feet and weigh (usually) over 250lbs. They are the kind of student who demand that you "do that on me" and expect that you are going to have to put the technique on them while they are resisting, as one of their opponents would resist against them.
I am commonly called on to assist in their instruction, being the senior student in the class and have had many of them on the floor. If I were to attack their mass, I would be embarrassed very quickly. Rather I understand 2 basic concepts.
First, the ability to strike properly to offset my man. Judo off-balances are great, and the philo is sound, but you are not going to pull off someone who has their wits and who has any skill with recapturing their balance. To counter this, you need to understand how to effectively strike from close range, how to strike w/short, circular motions, how to rip muscle and penetrate to the bone, how to make your strikes cause a body reaction. One you have caused a body reaction, your opponent is reacting to the pain and the loss of their game plan.
Secondly, seperate something. There are 5 points of balance: head, 2 arms, 2 legs. Instead of going in for the major throw, seperate one of the 5 points of balance, create a lock and take your opponent down and hang on to the lock while on the ground. Instead of attacking their mass by doing some form of throw, you can attack the weaker points of their body. The opponent's arm cannot resist a properly applied lock, AFTER the opponent has been properly set up through proper and pin-point accurate striking (see above paragraph.)
In short, when two people of the same size fight, you have the perfect match. But when you are dealing with someone larger than you, you have to think differently and use your size to your advantage. You mentioned that you wanted to be able to defend yourself against a larger, less trained, opponent. There is no reason tha tyou couldn't defeat an equally trained larger opponent, because each of you has your own advantages; it's a chess match.
Sorry I didn' thave time to proofread.
-Hikage
You guys are really missing a major point here. You are not going to head into the eye of the storm and come out unscathed. A little guy (like myself being only 5'8" and having no muscle mass) cannot defeat a larger attacker by wrestling with his mass. Doing judo throws are going to get you killed. I don't care how much you think you understand about off-balancing. You aren't going to defeat him in a grappling match on the ground either (I know we're in the BJJ forum, sorry).
Frequenty, our school is contracted to help with the training of members of the "3 B world" as I call it: Body Guards, Bouncers, and Bounty Hunters. These dudes we work with are routinely well over 6 feet and weigh (usually) over 250lbs. They are the kind of student who demand that you "do that on me" and expect that you are going to have to put the technique on them while they are resisting, as one of their opponents would resist against them.
I am commonly called on to assist in their instruction, being the senior student in the class and have had many of them on the floor. If I were to attack their mass, I would be embarrassed very quickly. Rather I understand 2 basic concepts.
First, the ability to strike properly to offset my man. Judo off-balances are great, and the philo is sound, but you are not going to pull off someone who has their wits and who has any skill with recapturing their balance. To counter this, you need to understand how to effectively strike from close range, how to strike w/short, circular motions, how to rip muscle and penetrate to the bone, how to make your strikes cause a body reaction. One you have caused a body reaction, your opponent is reacting to the pain and the loss of their game plan.
Secondly, seperate something. There are 5 points of balance: head, 2 arms, 2 legs. Instead of going in for the major throw, seperate one of the 5 points of balance, create a lock and take your opponent down and hang on to the lock while on the ground. Instead of attacking their mass by doing some form of throw, you can attack the weaker points of their body. The opponent's arm cannot resist a properly applied lock, AFTER the opponent has been properly set up through proper and pin-point accurate striking (see above paragraph.)
In short, when two people of the same size fight, you have the perfect match. But when you are dealing with someone larger than you, you have to think differently and use your size to your advantage. You mentioned that you wanted to be able to defend yourself against a larger, less trained, opponent. There is no reason tha tyou couldn't defeat an equally trained larger opponent, because each of you has your own advantages; it's a chess match.
Sorry I didn' thave time to proofread.
-Hikage
Comment