There are essentially two kinds of fights I like to see best: The top pros in title-level fights, and amatures. Here's why I find amature fights so exciting:
1. The amatures bring a lot more nervous energy into the ring. As a result, they are usually a lot more pumped up and the action goes WAY faster. Amature fights hardly ever go to a decision because both guys go balls-out compared to the pros.
2. There are a lot more one-dimensional amatures. Because of this, you get to see a lot of style-against-style fights reminiscent of the early UFCs, e.g. a sport bjj fighter against a karateka.
3. Amatures make a lot of mistakes. One of the reasons pro fights are slower and have fewer positions is that the pros are rarely out of position, giving them excellent defense; thus not as much attacking goes on because those on offense don't want to waste energy with ineffective moves/strikes. Further, because the pros are much better at capitalizing on mistakes, they are also more conservative because they don't want to get caught trying a bad move. Amatures, on the other hand, aren't as worried about mistakes and are more excited about attacking because a. there is a greater likelihood that their attack will be effective than in the pros and b. if they screw up and lose position, they are less likely to be taken advantage of.
4. There is something about the small event atmosphere. A much higher percentage of the audience are die-hard fans who weren't just people who heard the advertisement on the radio and thought they'd get to see some guys kicking each others' asses (shock-value viewers). But in the small amature events, a lot of people are there to support their friends/team mates/family members, so even though the place is small, everyone is a lot more riled up because a higher percentage of the audience knows a fighter personally and cheers loud for them.
Anyone else like amatures best, or have anything to add?
[Edited by Ravenman on 12-24-2000 at 05:30 AM]
1. The amatures bring a lot more nervous energy into the ring. As a result, they are usually a lot more pumped up and the action goes WAY faster. Amature fights hardly ever go to a decision because both guys go balls-out compared to the pros.
2. There are a lot more one-dimensional amatures. Because of this, you get to see a lot of style-against-style fights reminiscent of the early UFCs, e.g. a sport bjj fighter against a karateka.
3. Amatures make a lot of mistakes. One of the reasons pro fights are slower and have fewer positions is that the pros are rarely out of position, giving them excellent defense; thus not as much attacking goes on because those on offense don't want to waste energy with ineffective moves/strikes. Further, because the pros are much better at capitalizing on mistakes, they are also more conservative because they don't want to get caught trying a bad move. Amatures, on the other hand, aren't as worried about mistakes and are more excited about attacking because a. there is a greater likelihood that their attack will be effective than in the pros and b. if they screw up and lose position, they are less likely to be taken advantage of.
4. There is something about the small event atmosphere. A much higher percentage of the audience are die-hard fans who weren't just people who heard the advertisement on the radio and thought they'd get to see some guys kicking each others' asses (shock-value viewers). But in the small amature events, a lot of people are there to support their friends/team mates/family members, so even though the place is small, everyone is a lot more riled up because a higher percentage of the audience knows a fighter personally and cheers loud for them.
Anyone else like amatures best, or have anything to add?
[Edited by Ravenman on 12-24-2000 at 05:30 AM]
Comment