Originally posted by SamuraiGuy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
bjj question
Collapse
X
-
yea see that falls under "joint destruction" in my mind. unless you're a chin-na master of the level of freakin Pai Mei you can't apply that in a way that leaves the guy time to tap but also puts him so off balance and contorted that he can't just pull out of it.
cool technique but kinda messed up to pull in a sporting competition.
Comment
-
Registered User
- Jul 2004
- 1865
-
"a few User CP's that are pretty significant ones(like a BoarSpear or SamuraiGuy one). " - GracieHunter
I choke people, I dont poke people. -- Me
Were you born to resist or be abused? I swear I'll never give in, I refuse. -- Foo Fighters
I want a girl that spends more time on her back than Royce Gracie.
I'll knee you in the face like your name was Josh Koschek -- Me
-
Originally posted by SamuraiGuy View PostWith Boar gone I guess im the only one who can back you up....
lmao. I had to do it.. I couldn't resist lol...
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Judo_Jibboo View Posti gotcha. when someone says "lock" i think "pain compliance hold" aka submission, not snapping the joint. "joint destruction" on the other hand makes me think of applying a technique in an instant, breaking bone before the person has time to react, let alone tap. to be honest i don't know if that distinction is actually in the definition of the phrases or if i picked up that connotation misguidedly.
there's one technique that kinda illustrates the difference for me. it's a joint destruction from jujitsu. you get a hold of your opponent's left wrist with your right hand and wrench it straight across your chest while shooting your left arm across their neck (or chest if they're alot taller). anyway, probably hard to picture just from that but the point is if you apply it as a lock to make them tap they can just muscle their way out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SamuraiGuy View PostNo offense but when were you deemed significant....
I'm not sure that you were..
And I'm not sure if you know what I'm referring too
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Judo_Jibboo View Postyea see that falls under "joint destruction" in my mind. unless you're a chin-na master of the level of freakin Pai Mei you can't apply that in a way that leaves the guy time to tap but also puts him so off balance and contorted that he can't just pull out of it.
cool technique but kinda messed up to pull in a sporting competition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by J-Luck View PostNo no no... ugh stupid child! How many times must I school you? Ugh! Well, here I go again.
A. the whole dynamic behind a standing lock other than flying armbars and such are low percentage moves... the just are. Let me explain what that is for you... I'll type REAL BIG SO YOU CAN GET IT OK? LOW PERCENTAGE MOVES ARE THOSE THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO FINISH INTRINSICALLY BECAUSE OF THE SITUATION, POSITION, OR THE WAY YOU SET UP OR APPLY THE TECHNIQUE. STANDING ARMLOCKS FALL INTO THAT CATEGORY. IF YOUR WHITE BELT ASS DOESNT KNOW WHY, YOU WILL FIGURE IT OUT AS YOU MOVE UP. DONT WORRY, YOULL GET THERE SOMDAY.
ALSO, LOGIC/CRITICAL THINKING CLASSES WOULD DO YOU SOME GOOD. THOUGH MAYBE YOU'RE TOO UNINTELLIGENT/ INSECURE TO FIX THE ISSUE. OH WELL, CAN'T HELP THEM ALL I GUESS.
Comment
-
Originally posted by J-Luck View PostAnd no, I study Bjj under Tim Burrill, he is one of the first American black belts under Carlos Machado... you might have heard of him? I also study Judo, I wrestle and box. I consider myself primarily a grappler though. Hoping to start Muay Thai soon.
Comment
Comment