Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TO LINDEN - On the Gun Control thing ... and our REAL Problem in America ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Joe:

    Am I correct in assuming you are not a Christian?

    Comment


    • #17
      Whoever it was that hooked up the music for this thread…… LMFAO!!

      Mr. Manco makes some good points, but I see a potential problem. If we need to fight a war, what are we going to do for cannon fodder? Society needs an expendable, stupid, economically deprived sector from which to draw armed forces in times of conflict. Under Mr. Manco’s plan we would have a nation full of accountants and corporate executives. Not only that, but who is going to pick my veggies, clean my toilets, work on my 40 thousand dollar SUV, or more importantly, pleasure me orally for 50 bucks and a vial of crack? Sheer lunacy. Society needs an underclass to exploit. It always has and always will.


      [Edited by Dick B. Phookenwitu on 10-17-2000 at 11:05 AM]

      Comment


      • #18
        Ho-nin:
        I am religious, but definitely not Christian. The idea of ETERNALLY-DAMNING all those who "do not believe" is so childish, so primitive, so OBVIOUSLY the work of an insane fanatic ... that I cannot believe it is actually still espoused today. Now that's what I call "enlightenment," offering CONDITIONAL love ... and DAMNING those who do not love in return.

        I think O.J. Simpson is a Christian ...

        Is it any wonder then, that Christianity has screwed up the world more than any single religion known to man? Not only do its proponents PERSECUTE (in the spirit of their teacher), but it is the religion of the sick and impoverished.

        And yet the prophesy of the religion is coming true. The meek ARE inheriting the earth, precisely as set forth above ... they most unfit of our world are overpopulating and thrusting upon the shoulders of the better ALL of their problems and consequences wrought of their inequities.

        WHY?!!?

        Because "Christianity" has BRAINWASHED the majority of our populace to "bear the burden" for the inferior and the sick ... thus keeping them around and perpetuating this UNholy downward spiral.

        THAT is the subtle and terrible CANCER of Christianity for you in a nutshell. It spreads itself and infects. Just ask the Indians how their populace was "bettered" by Christianity.

        Now take a look around and look at the music and youth of today, and draw your own conclusions ... are we becoming "better" as a nation? ... or are we slowly de-volving and becoming one giant Trash Can?

        Yours at helping you reach The Truth,

        Joe




        [Edited by Joe Manco on 10-17-2000 at 11:35 AM]

        Comment


        • #19


          FIVE ALARM on that one!

          I'm just gonna sit back and watch--this is gonna be good.


          [Edited by Tony10 on 10-17-2000 at 11:57 AM]

          Comment


          • #20
            JM or PD or whatever,

            Great Troll!!!

            I never thought that I would hear you advocating, more or less, the Chinese Communist Policy!? WTF?

            E

            Comment


            • #21
              It's disney's "Beauty and the Beast"

              Comment


              • #22
                Joey Manco/Pit Dog,

                Here is a reply that I put in the Guns Post that you might enjoy!


                Linden,

                I think that you have hit on a key issue underlying the gun control debate: an issue of cultural change.

                The demographics of guns owner and NRA members are overwhelmingly middle age and older white males. In this group some think their place in society has been eroding in the last several decades. It seems likely that some of them have seized on the gun issue to indirectly fight this 'cultural' war, of sorts.

                Not to denigrate many peoples' genuine love of firearms, but I also think this cultural war has much, if not more, to do with this issue.

                On the good side for gun control advocates, these demographics guarantee, almost surely, that this issue will die out in the next 10-20 years as the majority of gun owners and rabid NRA owners die out. The gun control advocates will win - its a foregone conclusion. The NRA types are basically dinosaurs that dont realize that the ice age is already well upon them! (to be dramatic)

                So I would suggest that gun control advocates keep this in mind and be patient as you pursue your goals. DEMOGRAPHICS are OVERWHELMINGLY on your side. Unless the NRA can find some way to appeal to younger and non male and non white members, they are TOAST.

                Maybe PD should be producing dozens of his own whelp to keep the NRA cause alive in the coming decades.

                NRA types: all rhetoric aside, can you think of anyway your cause will be able to transcend its narrow and generally older demographic? I am surprised that the NRA doesnt worry more about this.

                E

                Comment


                • #23
                  Joe:

                  An even better response than I expected! I thought you were a psuedo-Christian. What is your religion anyway? You must dig the Muslim approach to conversion: worship Allah, or we'll kill you. That's got to be the most war-like major religion in the world, but also the most contemptuous of individual rights and scientific thinking, which you seem to advocate (sort of).

                  You are an environmentalist. Do you espouse the Gaia theory? If so, why do you object to "tree-hugging"? Trees need love, dude.

                  You're obviously not a Communist, per se'. Yet you advocate Statism when you talk about sterilizing poor people and culling the weak. Only a State would have the resources to do this. A lot of your ideas are being used in Singapore; i.e. harsh punishments for even petty crimes (flogging for vandalism), eugenics, etc. But they have no individual rights. It's hard to be a quasi-Statist.

                  BTW, I apologize for my behavior of the other day. I've been on a short fuse lately.

                  -Hari

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    One more question, Joe...

                    Are you calling me "Ho-nin" now, because you think I am a Ho, or because I am good wit da Ho's?

                    Either answer is acceptable.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                      Well, as usual you and I think a lot alike as far as people go. Old Linden came across as looking his nose down at us commoners when, even with all his high falutin BS, he obviously knows nothing about guns. Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply. You've put him in a box he can't get out of.
                      Hawk

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        LOL, and as far as Linden and Ho-nin (and "single-shot" guns) go, this country would rather have its citizens w/o assault rifles or any serious hardware ... because it will be easier to orchestrate and overthrow our current system into a Totalitarian regime and strip away all of our rights if WE could only fire single shots back into THEIR fully-automatic weapons ...

                        Strip away our power to fight back, that's the REAL idea and is what should be feared ...

                        And what better way to do this than by continuing to breed idiots w/o a clue

                        Yours truly,

                        Joe


                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Exquisite.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Dick, the Roman army was primarily made up of actual Roman citizens, the Plebians rather than the Peons. And what a successful army it was. Especially since most of the fighting men had a reason to fight. They had their families, homes and life-styles to protect.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Joe and Hawk:

                              There is only one force in this country that could take over this country - the military, and they could roll over you NRA yahoos RIGHT NOW. I don't think your .45 ACP's and semi-autos would do much good against M1 Tanks and Apache helicopters. You guys are living in fantasy-land! If the U.S. military can crush the fourth-largest army in the world in six weeks (Iraq), what makes you think small arms are going to help? Fortunately, the military is loyal to our democratically-elected government.

                              Let's not forget the bombers and cruise missiles! I'm SURE a 7.62mm slug could bring down a B-52, right guys? Why don't we hand out Stinger rocket launchers too, just to be on the safe side?

                              I studied Political Science for five years, and earned a B.A. I have NEVER heard of a democracy reverting to a dictatorship. Hasn't happened yet, no reason to think it will. Sorry.

                              LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Ronin,
                                Have you ever read the Turner Diaries? When the day you are talking about comes then it will make a nazi faggot sos look like a prophet. Most of the people in the service in this country will beau up before they start taking guns away from people, especially for Clinton or Gore. Another thing, there are probably as many or more combat vets in the NRA then there are in the US Military at this time and those "yahoos" have smelled the jungle as I have. B-52s won't even come into play in that type of conflict.It wouldn't be a cakewalk for anyone to walk over the NRA. If I was you I'd go back and kick my teacher's a$$ because Adolf Hitler was elected to run Germany which was a democracy at the time, which he turned into a dictatorship.
                                You're the one living in fantasy land, Ronin. I bet you think Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy and Jack Ruby killed
                                LHO so Jackie wouldn't have to testify, too.
                                HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                                Hawk

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X