As some of you may know, Carlos Lemos Jr. faced Daniel Morales in the finals of the 8 man tournament at the U.S. Submission Championships in Hendersonville, NC. As you may also know, Daniel won that match 4-0.
Carlos just called me, and he is pretty incensed over the whole affair, because:
1. the time limit for the match was changed from 10 minutes, to 8 minutes, right before the match started.
2. The rules sheet that was circulating did NOT show any indication that there would be points for takedowns. Yet all 4 of Daniels points were for takedowns.
3. after getting his 4 points, Daniel refused to aggressively try to attack Carlos for the rest of the match. Carlos initiated every takedown attempt, and every time the match went to the ground, all Daniel would do was hug Carlos and hold on for dear life.
And while this might be good strategy for winning by points, Carlos dislikes this approach to fighting, and does not believe it is an accurate reflection of what Brazilian Jiu-jitsu is about. He instills the philosophy in his students that we would prefer to lose going for a submission, than win on points. He says this is the Gracie Barra way, and thinks playing the "point game" is a cheap way to win.
4. There were supposed to be points awarded for submission attempts, yet Carlos did not receive his points for at least 3 submission attempts he had on Daniel.
5. Daniel never attempted a submission in the entire match. Again, Carlos' philosopy, and the Gracie Barra philosophy is to fight for a submission, not points...
Anyway, the bottom line is this. Carlos wants another match, a superfight if you will, against Daniel, with no time limit, and no points. A fight where somebody has to tap somebody else out, in order to win.
So, if anybody is holding a tournament anytime in the near future, and you are interested in trying to promote this match, please contact me, and I'll put you in touch with Carlos.
Believe me, this is not an idle request.. Carlos is mad as hell, and wants this match very, very badly. So anybody who can be of assistance in helping put this together, PLEASE contact me. My e-mail is mindcrime@cpphacker.co.uk.
Carlos just called me, and he is pretty incensed over the whole affair, because:
1. the time limit for the match was changed from 10 minutes, to 8 minutes, right before the match started.
2. The rules sheet that was circulating did NOT show any indication that there would be points for takedowns. Yet all 4 of Daniels points were for takedowns.
3. after getting his 4 points, Daniel refused to aggressively try to attack Carlos for the rest of the match. Carlos initiated every takedown attempt, and every time the match went to the ground, all Daniel would do was hug Carlos and hold on for dear life.
And while this might be good strategy for winning by points, Carlos dislikes this approach to fighting, and does not believe it is an accurate reflection of what Brazilian Jiu-jitsu is about. He instills the philosophy in his students that we would prefer to lose going for a submission, than win on points. He says this is the Gracie Barra way, and thinks playing the "point game" is a cheap way to win.
4. There were supposed to be points awarded for submission attempts, yet Carlos did not receive his points for at least 3 submission attempts he had on Daniel.
5. Daniel never attempted a submission in the entire match. Again, Carlos' philosopy, and the Gracie Barra philosophy is to fight for a submission, not points...
Anyway, the bottom line is this. Carlos wants another match, a superfight if you will, against Daniel, with no time limit, and no points. A fight where somebody has to tap somebody else out, in order to win.
So, if anybody is holding a tournament anytime in the near future, and you are interested in trying to promote this match, please contact me, and I'll put you in touch with Carlos.
Believe me, this is not an idle request.. Carlos is mad as hell, and wants this match very, very badly. So anybody who can be of assistance in helping put this together, PLEASE contact me. My e-mail is mindcrime@cpphacker.co.uk.
Comment