Ok, well I must admit, I don't know the exact biological reason that this happens as I'm not a phisiologist. However, I know somebody who is a radiologist, and he spends a lot of his time using ultrasound and x-rays to study bones and tissue etc. From what he tells me, it's observable that people who train in particular sports show higher/lower bone densities that can be predicted by the type of sport they do.
I just did a quick search - you could try looking at something like: http://health.yahoo.com/health/centers/bone_health/912
"Higher Impact Speeds Bone Health - Every time you take a step, land on your feet, hit a tennis ball or kick a soccer ball, chemical messages rush to your legs and arms warning them to get ready for the next impact and stimulating your bones to increase their strength..."
I know it's not *proof* as such, as it's just another internet page, but this is how it works as far as I understand it. I'll ask the radiologist I know, and see what he says about it...
Here's another quote from a the British National Health Service website:
"5.1.1Exercise management for bone health
O1 Exercise therapy in the form of weight bearing aerobic training activity and or strength training activity is now recognised as a valid and important intervention in the management of bone health. It is thought that the mechanical stresses that are put through bone during exercise can affect bone density. Weight bearing activity stimulates bone remodelling. It has been hypothesised that bone hypertrophy occurs in response to microfractures at the level of the osteon. Microscopic damage occurs where the tendon attaches to the bone when the stress applied is in excess of the normal levels, e.g., during weight bearing physical activity (27)
There is evidence that high impact exercise has the greatest potential to affect bone density in pre-menopausal women ( 28 ) ( 29 )
High impact exercise is suitable for those who regularly exercise. A lower impact programme of exercise is also appropriate especially for those not used to exercise. To be effective all exercise programmes need to be progressive in terms of impact and intensity as fitness and strength levels improve. However it is essential that all programmes begin at a low level which is comfortable for the patient. The assessment will give the physiotherapist a reference point from which to start the exercise programme. Reference should be made to the ACSM ( 17 ) on progression of exercise programmes. However it is generally accepted that microfracture is needed for an osteogenic response. "
What do you think?
I just did a quick search - you could try looking at something like: http://health.yahoo.com/health/centers/bone_health/912
"Higher Impact Speeds Bone Health - Every time you take a step, land on your feet, hit a tennis ball or kick a soccer ball, chemical messages rush to your legs and arms warning them to get ready for the next impact and stimulating your bones to increase their strength..."
I know it's not *proof* as such, as it's just another internet page, but this is how it works as far as I understand it. I'll ask the radiologist I know, and see what he says about it...
Here's another quote from a the British National Health Service website:
"5.1.1Exercise management for bone health
O1 Exercise therapy in the form of weight bearing aerobic training activity and or strength training activity is now recognised as a valid and important intervention in the management of bone health. It is thought that the mechanical stresses that are put through bone during exercise can affect bone density. Weight bearing activity stimulates bone remodelling. It has been hypothesised that bone hypertrophy occurs in response to microfractures at the level of the osteon. Microscopic damage occurs where the tendon attaches to the bone when the stress applied is in excess of the normal levels, e.g., during weight bearing physical activity (27)
There is evidence that high impact exercise has the greatest potential to affect bone density in pre-menopausal women ( 28 ) ( 29 )
High impact exercise is suitable for those who regularly exercise. A lower impact programme of exercise is also appropriate especially for those not used to exercise. To be effective all exercise programmes need to be progressive in terms of impact and intensity as fitness and strength levels improve. However it is essential that all programmes begin at a low level which is comfortable for the patient. The assessment will give the physiotherapist a reference point from which to start the exercise programme. Reference should be made to the ACSM ( 17 ) on progression of exercise programmes. However it is generally accepted that microfracture is needed for an osteogenic response. "
What do you think?
Originally posted by osopardo
Comment