Men Vs Women

[hEmPY]

yo

beatin doodz no problem girlz

LOL

[Slaya]

Wow man, the women got raped (Referring to the vote). And yes, yes I do have guts/ball/etc. And no, I do not bother to read the little titles under peoples names, I typically just treat everyone the same. It's my manner of respect. Alot of people don't like it though :P

As for the crap-tastic aerobics kickboxing class, yes it was a mistake. Those things happen time to time, especially when it is your first time. I guess you wouldn't know that though.

[Ahsen]

you can ask it, but depending on how personal it might be I may not answer

then i'll pm ya

[Gmantom]

I think the woman would win as long as she has her colt .38's.

[Little Apple]

Yeah, I voted for women on principle, but I think the guy would win generally. Not in every case or anything, there are always kick-ass exceptions, but in the few Guy vs. Gall firght I've seen the woman is just not agressive enough.

Again stressing the "not being sexist" thing, I mean, I AM a girl. It's just the truth. No drama.

[wavyd]

While I've seen some of the best technique from women fighters (some of the matches at the TBA Open were truly awesome), men naturally have more "knockout" power.

[Red Rum]

I don't think you can ever truly find an answer to this. I think the only way would be if you pitted the best MT guy in the world against the best MT female in the world.

I think generally, a lot of it comes down to size, weight, experience etc, whatever the gender. I have seen female kickboxers destroy male competitors before. I have been told that there are a lot fewer female MT practitioners than men as well which might affect it

[Tom Yum]

Rijker definitely took the fight to Jadee ever chance she got and was able to land a few kicks with good power and sweep one of Jadee's kicks; she even ate a big left cross and continued to take the fight forward.

Like Mike pointed out, in the second round when they started exchanging in the boxing range, Jadee's power was too much for her and it put her to the mat.

[Khun Kao]

Considering I've seen numerous male/female matchups in the ring, I have to agree with Tim. Man wins

[Ahsen]

you do realise this is a very very complecated debate.

Excessive Force can I ask you a Personal Question please ?

[Tim Mousel]

Did you read my post man. The same. The only "difference" would be the bone structure which is basically something you cannot change by working out. A man and a woman can have the same amount of muscle mass and in this hypathetical case, imagine they do.

Please read the post before you vote.

How old are you?

I did read your post and my reply remains the same. The man would win. Nothing about my answer would indicate that I did not read it.

According to your specifications: "Same height, weight, and virtually everything other than their body structure." If a man and a woman are the same height and weight, the man will still have more muscle mass unless the muay thai fighter you are thinking of is obese. The average woman is 25% body fat. That is considered obese for a man.

If the man and woman are exactly the same, including the amount of muscle mass and fat mass with the only difference being bone structure, the man would still win.

Also, to a degree you can change bone structure by working out (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/n...ry_50628.html). Bone density increases with the correct types of working out. Men generally have stronger bones than women.

Men also have more testosterone than women which offers a variety of advantages for fighting.

There are also mental/psychological factors to consider which also gives the man the advantage.

You state: "if it is possible for a woman fighter to get their body fat level to 5-8 percent then my question still holds it's ground. "

If it is possible? It's possible, but the woman would certainly be in no condition to be fighting as the essential fat for a woman is 10-12%. So based on that, the question doesn't "hold it's ground".

Tim

[Tom Yum]

I'd say man.

All thing being equal men tend to be better at fighting because of the reasons posted above: more muscle mass, the ability to hit harder with more explosive power.

Checkout Lucia Rijker's exhibition match against a male ex-flyweight? champ from Thailand. Rijker is very skilled and could probably knock out alot of dudes, some even larger, but when pit against someone who was as skilled as herself, she got KO'd.

[Slaya]

A bunch of you are absolutely missing the entire point of this and the rest of you are looking far too into it lol. I'm not asking anything over complicated, and I'm not asking if a girl can do more push ups than a guy. I'm just asking in a standard fight, doesn't matter what it is but two EXACTLY the same individuals, the only variable is gender. Now alot of you have been asking about the fight. For the sake of it lets say it is "sportive" but each individual have the exact same knoweldge of the exact same art(s) and can do it equally well.

[Ardith]

Guys that build muscle to look like Arnold aren't the guys that powerlift 800-900 lbs over their heads.

Mass does matter, but like any geometry teacher tells you, you can't go on looks.

My friend's dad and brother are both powerhouses when it comes to lifting weight. His father can benchpress 350 pounds and his brother set the state record in deadlifting at his age (I think 15 or 16 at the time). They are both guys who are smaller than me. Society just pushes the image that lean toned abs and pectorals and other muscle definition means that the guy is very strong.

Neutron stars are more massive than our sun, but are smaller. It's just food for thought.

[Slaya]

I remember sometime in the early nineties, Kathy Long proposed a fight between her and a man, and later bailed on the idea because she was getting banged up in preparation for it. I could be wrong, though. I've taken a lot of head shots since then...

I think it's like Tim says, with a caveat. A woman like, say, Layla Ali who walks around at 160lbs or better would have a pretty easy day against a guy of equal skill, but who only weighed 110 lbs. No one has ever said that women can't become just as tough as guys, or that they can't develop the same skill levels as guys. Still, physiology is a tough thing to overcome. When all else is equal, any advantage is an advantage, right? So a woman weighing 150 has a much different physiology than a guy at the same weight. An average woman carries between 18-25 percent bodyfat, just because of their anatomy. A male fighter at that weight might have a body fat level of 5-8 percent. In practical terms, that means a woman at 150 pounds might have as much as 30 pounds of weight on her frame in bodyfat. The man, likewise, has up to 30 extra pounds of muscle mass to throw around.

It's not a sexist thing - it's just what we are.

On your post, if it is possible for a woman fighter to get their body fat level to 5-8 percent then my question still holds it's ground. I fully understand that "practically" a guy would win because you don't see many female arnold swartzenegars around, but still. I find the question very interesting. I'd love to see this post fill up.