Originally posted by DickHardman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gunman Kills 21 on Virginia Tech campus
Collapse
X
-
hitting the enter key on your keyboard to post superhero fantasy replies of what you would or wouldnt do if you were in certain situations that you werent in is much faster than both of those.Originally posted by treelizard View PostSo what's faster, getting out a gun or dropping under a desk?
Leave a comment:
-
The odds on hiding under a desk suck more. I'd rather go out fighting.
And guns aren't the only weapon. A pen is a weapon. A desk is a weapon.
Leave a comment:
-
You have to act as decisively and as fast or faster as the attacker. Period. If you don't think you can do that or that it's possible when you're NOT in a situation you're not going to develop that ability DURING a situation. So while it's true that some people may say they would do something and not actually do it, I think it's pretty impossible for someone who doesn't even THINK he can take action to take action.Originally posted by DickHardman View Posti dont know about that. thats highly debatable.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe, but the odds on that idea suck. The thing is even if you have the right to carry a concealed weapon normally you can't in a school. That means that if you bring a weapon into a school you have the only weapon in the building. That puts a lot of power into the hands of a person who's willing to break the law.A gun would help but even without a gun you just need a guy to pick up the fucking table and rush him and another guy to go around the side and slam him with a chair. Or SOMETHING. I'm sure once they started other people would be more likely to help.
Leave a comment:
-
So what's faster, getting out a gun or dropping under a desk?Originally posted by DickHardman View Postum, a gun is faster to operate than walking over to an object, picking that object up, then walking over to your target, and then trying to hit him with it.
in fact, that is the whole idea behind the gun. to hit people with objects from were you stand.
Leave a comment:
-
i dont know about that. thats highly debatable.Originally posted by treelizard View PostI'm about a zillion times more likely to than someone who has decided ahead of time that nobody is capable of fighting back.
Leave a comment:
-
um, a gun is faster to operate than walking over to an object, picking that object up, then walking over to your target, and then trying to hit him with it.Originally posted by treelizard View PostSo if you have a gun, you suddenly have the time and clarity of mind to stop an attacker? I'm all for guns, but if you need a gun to be able to fight back you should get additional training.
in fact, that is the whole idea behind the gun. to hit people with objects from were you stand.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm about a zillion times more likely to than someone who has decided ahead of time that nobody is capable of fighting back.Originally posted by DickHardman View Postoh im sure you would. that still doesnt mean you will be able to when the time arises.
Leave a comment:
-
So if you have a gun, you suddenly have the time and clarity of mind to stop an attacker? I'm all for guns, but if you need a gun to be able to fight back you should get additional training.Originally posted by DickHardman View Postit would have increased the chances of stopping the rampaging gunman, thats for sure.
Leave a comment:
-
oh im sure you would. that still doesnt mean you will be able to when the time arises.Originally posted by treelizard View PostI'd rather get killed protecting other people than get killed hiding underneath a desk.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, people HAVE had the tme and clarity of mind to fight back against attackers EVEN AFTER they've been shot.
I'd rather get killed protecting other people than get killed hiding underneath a desk.
Originally posted by DickHardman View PostLOL. you really think that when someone has just opened fire on you with a gun that you have the kind of time and clarity of mind to simply go over to a table or chair, pick it up, then go all the way over to the attacker and then try to hit him with it? are you kidding? dude, you watch way too many movies. what you see in hollywood movies is not the same as in real life.
i heard one of the dead professors was a military man. im sure he would have stopped the gunman if he could have.
Leave a comment:
-
LOL. you really think that when someone has just opened fire on you with a gun that you have the kind of time and clarity of mind to simply go over to a table or chair, pick it up, then go all the way over to the attacker and then try to hit him with it? are you kidding? dude, you watch way too many movies. what you see in hollywood movies is not the same as in real life.Originally posted by treelizard View PostA gun would help but even without a gun you just need a guy to pick up the fucking table and rush him and another guy to go around the side and slam him with a chair. Or SOMETHING. I'm sure once they started other people would be more likely to help.
i heard one of the dead professors was a military man. im sure he would have stopped the gunman if he could have.
Leave a comment:
-
It's tragic.
See quite a few 'survivalists were jumping out of windows 25 feet up, with one breaking his leg.
Leave a comment:
-
What the hell are people training for, anyway? That's what I want to know.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: