[QUOTE=Tom Yum]Infinite Light, you sound like a walking pharmacy.
If certain drugs were meant to be taken, they'd be legal and/or approved by the FDA and the FDA scrutinizes ingestible man-made substances.
QUOTE]
Okay, so while I agree generally about the hazards of drug use, I have to point out that just because something is illegal doesn't make it bad, and the inverse of course. There isn't any evidence at all that THC (the psycho-active in marijuana) is harmful yet the FDA is not the least bit inclined to approve it - despite considerable evidence that it is beneficial to chemotherepy patients as a pain reducer (also glaucoma etc.).
The FDA is a government agency and thus subject firstly to political considerations (like the 'war on drugs' and the campaign contributions of pharmacutical companies), then secondly to your and my best interest; only theoretically are the two things synonomous.
If certain drugs were meant to be taken, they'd be legal and/or approved by the FDA and the FDA scrutinizes ingestible man-made substances.
QUOTE]
Okay, so while I agree generally about the hazards of drug use, I have to point out that just because something is illegal doesn't make it bad, and the inverse of course. There isn't any evidence at all that THC (the psycho-active in marijuana) is harmful yet the FDA is not the least bit inclined to approve it - despite considerable evidence that it is beneficial to chemotherepy patients as a pain reducer (also glaucoma etc.).
The FDA is a government agency and thus subject firstly to political considerations (like the 'war on drugs' and the campaign contributions of pharmacutical companies), then secondly to your and my best interest; only theoretically are the two things synonomous.
Comment