Hey, I was reading about the military intended to replace the U.S. military's M-16, called the XM8; it is supposed to be a lot better performing than the M16, much less likely to jam, easier to aim, and lighter, plus 70% easier to clean, etc....it is still being tested and the recent funding for it to put it into action was cut (but the rifle isn't dead, it just won't come into service as soon as hoped), anyways, I think I read (though not totally sure) that the rifle does not have a bayonet mount. Isn't that kind of stupid?? I mean, like this one guy said, nothing can stop a crowd of potential rioters like a company of Marines in full riot gear with rifles that have bayonets on them. A soldier on guard is one thing, but soldiers on guard with bayonets on the rifles just is a bit psychological to the enemy too, it helps keep people in place because they know if they charge they will still run into trouble. Also, it can help you if you run out of ammo and have to fight hand to hand, I mean, you never know if the U.S. might end up in some kind of other jungle fighting or something in the next 20, 30, or 40 years. You want to be able to attach a bayonet onto the gun if necessary.
My opinions anyways, if the rifle in fact cannot have a bayonet mounted on it.
For pics of the rifle, google it. It looks more like a kid's toy though then a military rifle; upon seeing it, you are like, THAT is the U.S. military's new rifle!?! Looks more like a water gun you'd buy at a K-Mart
My opinions anyways, if the rifle in fact cannot have a bayonet mounted on it.
For pics of the rifle, google it. It looks more like a kid's toy though then a military rifle; upon seeing it, you are like, THAT is the U.S. military's new rifle!?! Looks more like a water gun you'd buy at a K-Mart


Comment