You're a great writer. I really felt like I was there
Rick
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Building muscle for power, not size!
Collapse
X
-
That's very kind of you thank you and I appreciate your faith in me. I was quite new to forums when I first joined.
I do now have it in my list to write an article about using isometrics for martial arts training. If I'm lucky it will provide some good information for folks. Heck might even sell a book or two
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
It is my theory that isometrics leads to better technique as compared to plyometrics as I believe stable force called for greater gross motor coordination along with better form. I wish I had an article to present on this but it's just in my book and that would be promotion of my work directly so my apologies. I will try to get an article out on it as soon as I can or perhaps this discussion will help me to form thought for an article
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kanik View PostOhhh yeaaah! Isometrics completely slipped my mind! But arent they not the best for explosive strength? because of there stationary nature? But yeah, they do work, not quite sure on explosiveness though. But hey, I aint the smartest in the world so correct me if I'm wrong.
Plyometrics give immediate feedback on whether you're being explosive enough -- if you're doing a box jump, if you jump high enough to make it on top of the box, you're being explosive enough. With isometrics, you don't get that feedback, so you need to be careful not to cheat yourself. Put your hand on the wall, then explode through quickly and hold for 5 seconds.
Leave a comment:
-
I thought power was m/t but it's been over twenty years and a few hundred kicks to my head
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
Strength is ultimately limited by size. Unless you're competing in a weight class,you should not worry about size gain. Better nervous recruitment from lifting real heavy will lead to strength gains,and more moderate size gains,muscle growth (hypertrophy) from longer sets with more moderate weight will lead to more moderate strength gains,and better size gains. Both methods are used by track and field athletes and lifters,the latter for building a general foundation of strength.
Your explosiveness is heavily related to your maximum strength levels,the maximum amount of force that you can generate. This is why you ought to lift weight near your max regularly (think of slow,grueling lifts like the squat,bench and deadlift of powerlifting). Power is velocity+force,maximum strength training takes care of the "force" part (hypertrophy training also is included). Then you also need to work on your speed by lifting lighter loads with the greatest speed you can master,this takes care of the "velocity" part. There are also exercises,such as the olympic lifts,which will help build both abilities at the same time,as these lifts must be completed with great speed. Finally,there are sport specific exercises or/and the very training of the moves of your sport/art to build specific power.
This may only confuse you,and you really should pick up a few books on the subjects. I just want to illustrate the technicality of the subject.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kanik View PostOhhh yeaaah! Isometrics completely slipped my mind! But arent they not the best for explosive strength? because of there stationary nature? But yeah, they do work, not quite sure on explosiveness though. But hey, I aint the smartest in the world so correct me if I'm wrong.
Do it in three ranges of motion. You'll only develop strength in the position you preform the isometric exercise in
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KirkhamsEbooks. View PostAnother possiblility then I mention in my book on internal energy strikes is isometrics. No bulk seems to develop from their use
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
Another possiblility then I mention in my book on internal energy strikes is isometrics. No bulk seems to develop from their use
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I do not want to go up a weight class. I dont want bulk is what I'm saying, just more power.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Filero View PostUnless it pushes him up into the next weight class where he gets slaughtered. We don't know exactly why he wants power without gaining size, just pointing out that there are good reasons why doing so might make sense.
my bad, good for brining that up...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DickHardman View Postmuscles are good for fighters bro, being as big and muscular as you can get is to your advantage.
Leave a comment:
-
Since the forumula for kinetic energy is 1/2mv^2 half mass x velocity squared. One effective method of training for power is to attempt to increase repetitions in a given amount of time. Also keep in mind power for striking comes from proper gross motor coordination so something such as pully weights emuluating your strike may also be effective
Rick
Leave a comment:
-
muscles are good for fighters bro, being as big and muscular as you can get is to your advantage. having thick layers of muscle to cover your back and neck, and your organs and bones is a good thing. it can cushion your body from impacts from falling to the ground, being slammed, and being hit with strikes and objects. it is to your advantage inmop. ive been slammed on my back a few times before, and my trapz actually cushioned the impact, protecting my neck and head.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: