Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Knife

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Quote by william
    "I recently met a person who has been an instructor for 20+ years in an art that you would all be very familiar with (I will not name the art or the person). He is very good at what he does hand to hand. He had developed his own set of knife disarms and counters that he taught to his students. About 8-9 years ago one of his better students was killed in a knife fight in a bar. He felt somehow responsible for his students death (whether he was or not …?) and quit teaching his blade techniques".

    First I would like to address William. I am very sorry to hear about the student who was killed what a terrible tragedy.

    I also have a question, would the student have been better off if the instructor had not taught any knife techniques at all? What I’m asking is do you think that his training gave him a false sense of security and he thought he could take the perp with the knife? Or do you think if he hadn’t had any knife training at all maybe he wouldn’t have had any false confidence and he would have found a better alternative to fighting like running away?

    I think that many instructors do not apply the science of knife fighting correctly or just give their students a few drills to perform and then say you are good knife fighters. A lot of instructors do not have any real experience and just buy into what their instructors told them good or bad.

    I have received some knife training in the military albeit a one-week course it wasn’t much. Some of that training has been reinforced in some combative courses I have taken since. Some of this training has been very good, but I have to admit I have received what I now know was some bad training (I didn’t know any better at the time).

    I want to tell you a story about what one of my more imaginative teachers did.

    In our class one day each week was devoted to weapons (knife and stick), the rest on other skills and sparring.

    We would practice disarms, then do drills and at the end of each class we always did free knife or stick, or mixed sparring. After 3-4 months we all thought we were pretty good.

    One day we had some guests show up at our school, nobody knew who they were. We all had to go out into the hall way and wait until we were asked to come in. One by one we all went in. As we entered the floor from the hall way one of those strangers was standing there as we neared he would quickly pull a knife from his belt and wham, one by one we all fell victim to a knife that the stranger stuck in our bellies or sliced our necks.

    We would try to ready our knives but usually we would be nailed before we could do so, or those who were able to ready themselves were cut during an onslaught of stabs and slices.

    It turns out he brought some friends in to demonstrate to us how dangerous, sudden and explosive a real knife fight could be. Not one of us was successful at defending ourselves. Boy was it a blow to our pride and egos.

    My instructor then got up in front and said, “none of you used your best weapons, your legs”. We asked you mean to kick with? “He said no to run”! We all tried to stand toe to toe with the attacker and fight.

    My philosophies about knife defense are this (in order of importance).

    1) RUN!
    2) Use an obstacle to keep between you and the attacker (Table, car, desk, etc.).
    3) Hasty weapons: Weapons that gives you better distance like a chair (you can swing it or throw it at the attacker to give you an opportunity to escape), Pool cue, beer bottles (beer mugs), end tables, etc can all be used as weapons to keep distance and, or provide time/opportunity to escape.
    4) Knife: If you are armed with a knife use it but be fast, and strike to cause damage. * Dueling is very bad!
    5) Kick- kick to cause damage. This also helps to maintain distance.
    6) Unarmed techniques: All the above has failed perform unarmed against armed techniques.
    * If you were armed with a gun, I would still attempt escape first, if there were no practical escape then shoot.

    First off you need to be honest with yourself and your students about the realities of a knife fight (good chance at death or severe injury). Training needs to include drills, work on footwork, sparring against uncooperative opponents, and the practice of realistic scenarios using props, actors, and scripts.

    Knife fighting is a serious business the best advice I can give anyone is not to do it. Last resort only! Use common sense to keep yourself safe and for god sake leave your egos at home.

    I tell people all the time that no matter how much you train there are no guarantees that you will win against a knife. Knife training will help you to be more likely to be successful, but don’t think for a second you are invincible. I think training with knives shows you just how easy it is to seriously hurt, and if that make you realize that you best not do it, then that alone is worth the training.

    Emphasis needs to be placed on how to avoid being victims of violence in the first place through intelligence, situational awareness, threat assessment, escape and evasion and so on.

    Keep in mind your training needs to be kept up continuously to maintain your skill level. When it comes to knife fighting: skills, reflexes, and mindset diminish quickly if you let you training stand idle.

    Comment


    • #77
      Good point William. I too have had those same concerns with regard to knife training. We have been approach by some who want to learn “just the knife fighting” and we’ve turned them down. If they want to learn knife techniques, they will have to learn it as part of the system and not a separate skill. By the time they get to the knife techniques, we will have already figured out who they are and have gone through enough seemingly endless baston drills and strikes to “test” their determination. My teacher’s teaching methods are a great way of determining true motivation.

      Someone can always say that any skill that harms others should be taught to only a selected individuals; it doesn’t matter is it’s learning for shoot or learning to kick. But I disagree with that. Knife training is specifically dangerous to teach because the weapon used is so common, easily concealed and lethal. It’s the availability of the weapon that makes the skills dangerous to teach to just anyone. It’s more dangerous that teaching someone how to fire and anti-tank weapon.

      In the old days, FMA teachers chose students very carefully and more often than not money wasn’t a consideration. There are still teachers who are picky about who they teach but I’m sure a lot more couldn’t care less; you just need to fork over the cash. It’s that kind of approach that results in media-frenzied stories of FMA-trained killers stabbing bouncers and other innocents.

      Comment


      • #78
        Darrianation wrote:

        First I would like to address William. I am very sorry to hear about the student who was killed what a terrible tragedy
        I was sorry to hear of it too.

        I also have a question, would the student have been better off if the instructor had not taught any knife techniques at all? What I’m asking is do you think that his training gave him a false sense of security and he thought he could take the perp with the knife? Or do you think if he hadn’t had any knife training at all maybe he wouldn’t have had any false confidence and he would have found a better alternative to fighting like running away?
        Since I was not present when it happened, I cannot answer directly to your question. Running away would have been the best alternative....if he ever had the chance to do it. I don't know that he did or didn't. But, seeing some of what was taught to him...I don't think he had much of a chance other than running.

        I think that many instructors do not apply the science of knife fighting correctly or just give their students a few drills to perform and then say you are good knife fighters. A lot of instructors do not have any real experience and just buy into what their instructors told them good or bad
        Very true. That is why I started this thread in the first place. I've seen too many students and instructors dealing with blade work like it's just another innocuous tool that you just do technique 1A-B-or C, or kick out of someones hand...lickety-split, just like that. This type of crud does build a flase sense of security, and in the case of the instructor mentioned, very well may have gotten the student killed.

        I tell people all the time that no matter how much you train there are no guarantees that you will win against a knife. Knife training will help you to be more likely to be successful, but don’t think for a second you are invincible
        That is something I've touched on a lot in this and other threads. Your margin for error in dealing with a blade is next to zero. The best you can do is train constantly and realistically (using tools you mentioned as well as others touched on through out this thread) to better your percentages of successfully dealing with (or avoiding) a bladed encounter...but there are no certainties. And yes, the absolute best technique you can use going up against a blade is to run like a mofo if you can.

        Juramentado Wrote:

        By the time they get to the knife techniques, we will have already figured out who they are and have gone through enough seemingly endless baston drills and strikes to “test” their determination. My teacher’s teaching methods are a great way of determining true motivation.
        Very true. Those seemingly endless hours of power striking and footwork drills have a way of weeding out those that are looking for the quick and easy route to the meat of it.

        Someone can always say that any skill that harms others should be taught to only a selected individuals; it doesn’t matter is it’s learning for shoot or learning to kick. But I disagree with that. Knife training is specifically dangerous to teach because the weapon used is so common, easily concealed and lethal. It’s the availability of the weapon that makes the skills dangerous to teach to just anyone. It’s more dangerous that teaching someone how to fire and anti-tank weapon
        Again, very true. You can punch or kick someone multiple times and hurt them or knock them out...and they almost always get back up...eventually. Impact weapons can break bones and kill, but again, not always. Blades on the other hand always cut or puncture the skin opening up blood flow, easily cutting tendons, arteries, veins, muscle tissue, punctureing organs etc... The percentages are much higher that you won't survive. A knife in the hands of un-skilled person can still be lethal. Because it's so readily available, concealable and lethal, it's not something that should be taught to just anyone who shows an interest or want's to throw down the dough. And even worse, to anyone willing to mail in dough for video tape learning.

        Great points folks.

        William

        Comment


        • #79
          This is an odd thread.

          From what I gather, many are from FMAs systems that hold seminars and have had videos of their systems represented by someone somewhere down the line.

          Unless I'm mistaken.
          Knife related videos, books and seminars have come from systems such as:

          Sayoc Kali
          Doce Pares
          JKD
          Pekiti Tirsia Kali
          Fairburn/Sykes combatives
          Panandata
          Illustrisimo
          Ernie Franco
          Vunak
          Sevilian
          Apache
          European Arts
          Fulsom
          Ninjitsu, tanto/iaido or other Japanese related arts
          Silat
          Keating

          and many, many more.


          The very CULTURE of the FILIPINOS have been the blood of those before us who passed on this knowledge of the knife. It wasn't a secret society BS either - EVERYONE back then had access to a blade.

          Think about it- when another culture came to oppress them- the oppressors ALREADY had weapons of their own. They didn't need to learn what the Filipinos had.

          Now translate it to our way of life.

          A criminal doesn't NEED videos, books or seminars to use a knife.
          They never had.
          They never did.
          They never will.

          CRIMINALS have knives and weapons already.

          The good guys need to learn it.

          And if all you good guys don't know what the criminals know then do not blame the people above offering you the opportunities to learn it. No matter what system or style is listed above- they are teaching because there's a need for it.

          Are we all sure this is a FILIPINO MARTIAL ARTS forum?

          Lastly:
          "DISARMS are for friends for family members."
          Tuhon Sayoc

          which means if you are in a situation where that is not applicable- then go to your next option immediately.

          --Rafael--
          Sayoc Kali
          ---------
          ---------
          -------
          --------

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Sun_Helmet
            "DISARMS are for friends for family members."
            Tuhon Sayoc
            text correction:
            "DISARMS are for friends AND family members."

            Comment


            • #81
              From what I gather, many are from FMAs systems that hold seminars and have had videos of their systems represented by someone somewhere down the line
              Yea, but that wasn't the point of the last question. The question asked was along the lines of; "What, if anything, do you do to screen people before you start teaching them serious blade work"? The side comment was about selling serious blade videos to anyone who wants to throw down the dough.

              The very CULTURE of the FILIPINOS have been the blood of those before us who passed on this knowledge of the knife
              True, but I wasn't talking about passing on knowledge to our families, tribes, or waring groups for survival. I'm talking about today, and about the occasional nut job that comes looking for and is fixated on "killer blade techniques" and nothing else. Or even the short tempered, emotional out burst guy with no control. I'm not saying that folks like this come walking in everyday, but I've run into my share. Are you telling me that you would have no reservations in teaching people like this today, in a civilian society? I'm not talking about teaching soldiers, or tribesmen about to walk into war facing death. I'm talking everyday Joe/Jane Q. Public.

              It wasn't a secret society BS either - EVERYONE back then had access to a blade
              No one said it should be kept secret, just maybe a bit of thought put into who you teach what. EVERYONE still has access to a blade. Teaching people just makes them more efficient and effective with them.

              A criminal doesn't NEED videos, books or seminars to use a knife.
              They never had.
              They never did.
              They never will
              Again, true. But if they do buy or get to... videos, books or seminars to use a knife...just refer to my last comment.

              CRIMINALS have knives and weapons already.
              No argument there.

              The good guys need to learn it
              Of course. But who do you define and/or determine as "good guys" from a civilian environment? But back to the original question, what do YOU do to figure out who is on which side of the fence?

              And if all you good guys don't know what the criminals know then do not blame the people above offering you the opportunities to learn it. No matter what system or style is listed above- they are teaching because there's a need for it
              No one is "blaming" anyone, just asking where YOU define your responsibility in teaching what you do, to whom you teach. I believe that's one of the things Mr. Brewer was getting at in his original post.

              Are we all sure this is a FILIPINO MARTIAL ARTS forum?
              Last time I checked it was...how are you defining it now?

              William

              Comment


              • #82
                "Yea, but that wasn't the point of the last question. The question asked was along the lines of; "What, if anything, do you do to screen people before you start teaching them serious blade work"? The side comment was about selling serious blade videos to anyone who wants to throw down the dough."

                And criminals learn it for FREE.

                Depends if you think what's on the videos and seminars are "serious". From my POV the Sayoc Kali DVDs are designed as an introduction to our knife system. We've gotten great response, because the attendees and buyers were satisfied with how the blade "chaos" is deconstructed. Some may feel this is high end blade work being sold but from our POV it is LONG OVERDUE blade work being taught at an introductory level. One has to wonder why the fuss- this should be basic knife material?

                As far as Sayoc Kali screening is concerned, in a seminar atmosphere- attendees are videotaped and archived as attending the seminar (so we can go back ten years and see if the person actually attended or not - visual proof is easier to identify for sure), next - students sign several documents and are asked to fill out a 'profile' (again for our archives). And unless the student is Military or an LEO they are finger printed. Not to show how 'deadly' they are, but that we keep track of who comes and goes in our records. So if you do something 'nutty' we can assist the PTB in tracking you down. The way we screen dissuades some who are already kinda 'nutty' or have some aversion of being tracked.

                "True, but I wasn't talking about passing on knowledge to our families, tribes, or waring groups for survival. I'm talking about today, and about the occasional nut job that comes looking for and is fixated on "killer blade techniques" and nothing else. Or even the short tempered, emotional out burst guy with no control. I'm not saying that folks like this come walking in everyday, but I've run into my share. Are you telling me that you would have no reservations in teaching people like this today, in a civilian society? "

                However not all statistics hold your premise up. There are as many 'nut jobs' WITHIN families that cause domestic homicides or homicides from people that are 'friends'. Sometimes no apparent clue until way later in their training. Well beyond the seminar or dvd stage. IF a blatant 'nutjob' enters a Sayoc seminar they are not going to go beyond that seminar. They will be asked to leave.

                "No one said it should be kept secret, just maybe a bit of thought put into who you teach what. EVERYONE still has access to a blade. Teaching people just makes them more efficient and effective with them."

                This is where I feel many have misperceptions of the Sayoc Kali system (I can only speak from our POV). Having 'little thought' in our blade system is not what other critics have tried to pass off. Some even said it was ineffective until they actually took a class, word has spread and it seems another marketing agenda is at hand.

                The ONE nutcase you THINK might go postal should NOT dissuade the REST of the responsible public from learning what they sought to learn. We have to get away from this victim mentality.
                And contrary to what we see in films or read- the NUTCASES can NOT be screened so easily- and what defines a nutcase is based on the context of someone's perspective.

                In the General PUBLIC's POV- you training in ANY effective Martial Art is considered pretty nutty.
                "
                Again, true. But if they do buy or get to... videos, books or seminars to use a knife...just refer to my last comment."

                Quote:
                CRIMINALS have knives and weapons already.


                "But who do you define and/or determine as "good guys" from a civilian environment? But back to the original question, what do YOU do to figure out who is on which side of the fence?"

                There's no 100 percent screening process outside of not teaching the public. And as I said above- the nutcases can be from within the family anyway. Don't fear the criminals having this info- They already have it.


                "No one is "blaming" anyone, just asking where YOU define your responsibility in teaching what you do, to whom you teach. I believe that's one of the things Mr. Brewer was getting at in his original post."

                Responsibility is in your OWN personal conduct and experience. Your students will take your example and if you're lucky- they follow it. There's no system out there that can say that their students are all angels, we may hope they all are but all this talk of morality is up to a person's PERSONAL spiritual beliefs, religion or therapist.

                In addition to the seminar and introductory archiving, The system itself is a screening process. In Sayoc Kali, it is designed to bring the student along in a manner that responsibility, and advancement is earned through actions and dedicated training. That's part of the evolution. Another is that a student has an instructor that vouches for the student. One can not be a full time Sayoc student without the sponsorship of a higher up. It's treated like an apprenticeship program. Old warrior societies had a similar setup. That was how they got better.

                We've had students come in with dubious backgrounds and it is possible that many here may have shunned them, but we're not looking for surface cues. We're looking for the student we can bring along and teach the proper methods of belonging in this day's society. If we don't take them in and show them a positive system then it isn't going to help anyone in the long run.

                They are given a chance.

                One of those important lessons is to give them responsibility and treat them as adults, not sheep that we have to shield from other systems or other methods of training. We do not give them the "US versus THEM" treatment.

                If anyone out there is looking for good knife training dvds then check sayoc.com out.

                All my fellow 'nutjobs' are welcome.

                A nutjob is a subjective term ... to the rest of the world- someone in this forum called DEFEND.net reading a FMA forum and following a thread on KNIFE is a definite nutjob.


                --Rafael--
                Sayoc Kali
                "not the Past but the Future"
                --------
                -------
                -----
                ------

                Comment


                • #83
                  Depends if you think what's on the videos and seminars are "serious". From my POV the Sayoc Kali DVDs are designed as an introduction to our knife system. We've gotten great response, because the attendees and buyers were satisfied with how the blade "chaos" is deconstructed. Some may feel this is high end blade work being sold but from our POV it is LONG OVERDUE blade work being taught at an introductory level. One has to wonder why the fuss- this should be basic knife material?

                  Fuss about what? I didn't ask what You thought was advanced or not. I asked how do you (anyone), if at all, screen people before teaching them (what ever you call advanced blade material in your...insert name...system) advanced blade work. But hey, work in a plug for your system where ever you can right...with a back handed shot at everyone else to boot.

                  Now this is closer to the original question (of anyone who wants to reply) for:

                  As far as Sayoc Kali screening is concerned, in a seminar atmosphere- attendees are videotaped and archived as attending the seminar (so we can go back ten years and see if the person actually attended or not - visual proof is easier to identify for sure

                  That would cover whether any one makes false claims as to being a instructor in the system through seminars.

                  next - students sign several documents and are asked to fill out a 'profile' (again for our archives). And unless the student is Military or an LEO they are finger printed. Not to show how 'deadly' they are, but that we keep track of who comes and goes in our records. So if you do something 'nutty' we can assist the PTB in tracking you down. The way we screen dissuades some who are already kinda 'nutty' or have some aversion of being tracked

                  Ok.

                  Not to show how 'deadly' they are...

                  Not sure how a finger print relates to "How deadly they are"?

                  Referring back to your first post:

                  The very CULTURE of the FILIPINOS have been the blood of those before us who passed on this knowledge of the knife.

                  This is what I was referring to when I said, "True, but I wasn't talking about passing on knowledge to our families,
                  tribes, or warring groups for survival. I'm talking about today,".
                  It had nothing to do with current family statistics, I was referring to ancestral families/ tribal groups preparing and defending against invaders in reference to your line above. If I was quoting current statistics, I would have put up numbers to back up whatever I would have put forth.

                  This is where I feel many have misperceptions of the Sayoc Kali system (I can only speak from our POV). Having 'little thought' in our blade system is not what other critics have tried to pass off. Some even said it was ineffective until they actually took a class, word has spread and it seems another marketing agenda is at hand

                  Whatever, the question wasn't system specific. I'm not sure why you always seem to get so defensive about SK? If it's good for you, more power to you. If it's as good as you feel it is, let it stand on it's own instead of making controversy where there is none. Another marketing agenda at hand? Who are you referring to? I think you should look in the mirror.

                  The ONE nutcase you THINK might go postal should NOT dissuade the REST of the responsible public from learning what they sought to learn. We have to get away from this victim mentality.

                  I agree. No one suggested not teaching, just being a little cautious and getting to know them before running off to the carotid arteries.

                  In the General PUBLIC's POV- you training in ANY effective Martial Art is considered pretty nutty.

                  Again, true. But if you've been around, you get pretty good at being able to read people. I'm not talking about people training with you one or two days, but working with you regularly, week in and week out, for a couple of months. Unless your totally oblivious, your going to get a sense of where the person is at. It's not 100% fool proof. But it's more effective than not getting to know them at all.

                  Don't fear the criminals having this info- They already have it

                  It's not the "hardened " criminal I'm referring to, more like weeding out someone teetering on the fence. But again, It's a question. I know there aren't a handful of off-kilter people walking in on a weekly basis. I bring it up because I've seen it comeback on another instructor.

                  Responsibility is in your OWN personal conduct and experience.

                  That's right. And that's why I asked. Where do you take up the responsibility for what you (any one of us) teach?

                  In addition to the seminar and introductory archiving, The system itself is a screening process. In Sayoc Kali, it is designed to bring the student along in a manner that responsibility, and advancement is earned through actions and dedicated training. That's part of the evolution. Another is that a student has an instructor that vouches for the student. One can not be a full time Sayoc student without the sponsorship of a higher up. It's treated like an apprenticeship program. Old warrior societies had a similar setup. That was how they got better

                  That went back to answering the original question.

                  Then we're off again...

                  We do not give them the "US versus THEM" treatment.... etc...

                  Maybe not, but apparently to many out side of the SK system you do. You go on to make a lot of inferences and innuendo that everyone else would shun people because they have some blemishes on their background and wouldn't get a fair shake from some of the rest of us here. Again, the question was about what sort of responsibility do you (anyone) take for what you teach. And we aren't talking about underwater basket weaving here. You touch on it at a few points. The rest is just diatribe and putting down others in a back handed manner. I have had good exchanges with you in the past. I've also had exchanges that run like this one when you get all defensive.

                  A nutjob is a subjective term ... to the rest of the world- someone in this forum called DEFEND.net reading a FMA forum and following a thread on KNIFE is a definite nutjob.

                  Very true. And "All blade, all the time" would be considered pretty nutjob to the rest of the world as well.

                  In the words of the immortal Sgt. Hulka, "Lighten up Francis".

                  All the best,

                  William

                  Comment


                  • #84

                    "Fuss about what? I didn't ask what You thought was advanced or not. I asked how do you (anyone), if at all, screen people before teaching them (what ever you call advanced blade material in your...insert name...system) advanced blade work."


                    You referred to SERIOUS Knife work.
                    And again, my reply is any knife work is SERIOUS. That's why I was trying to delineate what you meant about UN- Serious knife work. Now you mention teaching ADVANCED Knifework in seminars and videos... and I reply that what's in OUR tapes and seminars was NOT Advanced.

                    Now that's not a bash, but a fact. Why are you irked by it?

                    In fact the original post I had added the SIMILARITIES that just about ALL MAs systems have taught seminars and tapes on the knife. They are ALL serious and none of them are ADVANCED.

                    Happy?

                    Now if that sounds defensive- it isn't. It is an observation that is backed by years of ads for seminars and tapes from just about every knife system imaginable. Now before you see that as a bash (which it isn't), it is saying that no well known knife system is innocent of NOT teaching thru seminars and tapes.

                    From my POV that it is NOT a bad thing.

                    " But hey, work in a plug for your system where ever you can right...with a back handed shot at everyone else to boot."

                    Nice spin on the back handed shot comment- if it works for you- go for it. The words are here for everyone else to discern.

                    You also wrote:
                    No one is "blaming" anyone, just asking where YOU define your responsibility in teaching what you do, to whom you teach. I believe that's one of the things Mr. Brewer was getting at in his original post.

                    Which piggy backs this thread to one that was initially negatively slanted against Sayoc Kali. You took a thread that has pretty much worked it's way out and revived it in here. You even refer it (see above). Then you ask coyly why I, as a Sayoc Kali rep am answering based on what Sayoc Kali does.

                    ummm...because YOU asked?

                    Btw, this would be a horrible way to PLUG- it's preaching to the converted in here. No one is going anywhere they don't want to be.

                    "Whatever, the question wasn't system specific. I'm not sure why you always seem to get so defensive about SK? If it's good for you, more power to you. If it's as good as you feel it is, let it stand on it's own instead of making controversy where there is none. Another marketing agenda at hand? Who are you referring to? I think you should look in the mirror."

                    That's not going to work here William. You just referred to Mr. Brewer's post above. One that has "Sayoc Kali" emblazoned on it.... Now you're wondering why my reply post is system specific?


                    ------

                    Anyone can check the archives and see if I've ever started a thread bashing anyone. To legitimately answer threads that begin with a bash on a system I teach and train in, is evident just this recent week. Just look at the thread titles.

                    The rest of the time I have answered from the Sayoc Kali POV because that is what I can refer to... I am not going to speak about how someone else screens or teaches morality etc. You asked what I thought. Now you're irked that I answered mentioning Sayoc Kali. I also mentioned about ten other systems when I listed their commonality in doing knife seminars and tapes. That's a fact.

                    Recently I wrote in this forum a post which supports our Sayoc Kali students training with others REGARDLESS of system- that doesn't sound like someone who is here to bash any system.

                    "I agree. No one suggested not teaching, just being a little cautious and getting to know them before running off to the carotid arteries."

                    Why not? That IS caution!
                    If you're teaching the knife- why isn't the first thing you teach a student the fact that the carotid artery is one of the most vulnerable targets on their body?

                    Why not teach them the medical management of the carotid artery?
                    How about ways the carotid artery can be targeted from angles we would most likely not protect?

                    Why isn't the first thing you teach them the death time table for the arteries?
                    This isn't magic- because ANY of the targets the student is liable to use a knife on is probably CONNECTED to the carotid arteries in some fashion.

                    Now we can be 'cautious' ? Yet, from my POV isolating the carotid targets in their first lesson is caution, because we are showing that the carotids' fragility are important to study and learn. It isn't rocket science but KNIFE 101. It's also common knowledge to most adults.

                    We're not teaching them what a carotid artery is- we're teaching them how to protect it and how to isolate it.

                    Any attacker- untrained or not will attack parts they think will do the victim bodily harm- most likely the carotids are on the top of that list. And if your student isn't taught that and they go off in their second week and actually have to use a knife- wouldn't it also be immoral if they accidentally cut at the carotids without ever being taught those are 'timers'?

                    "I'm not talking about people training with you one or two days, but working with you regularly, week in and week out, for a couple of months. Unless your totally oblivious, your going to get a sense of where the person is at. It's not 100% fool proof. But it's more effective than not getting to know them at all."

                    A person UNTRAINED and DETERMINED with a knife will be just as deadly as a trained individual. Our knife material isn't going to cause them to become criminals if they are already in that dark place. They will not be any less dangerous because they got a video- they already were.

                    What the video shows (now don't get irked William, - I have to refer to Sayoc Kali videos) is that this chaotic attack can be deconstructed into a series of patterns.

                    What was once chaos are now patterns that a student can recognize. It isn't something that needs to be learned to do- THEY ALREADY INSTINCTIVELY KNOW IT - it is something that needs to be broken down in a manner so that an attack won't be something that appears to be mere chaos.

                    "It's not the "hardened " criminal I'm referring to, more like weeding out someone teetering on the fence. But again, It's a question. I know there aren't a handful of off-kilter people walking in on a weekly basis. I bring it up because I've seen it comeback on another instructor."

                    And I've also seen numerous students benefit greatly from seminars and dvds.

                    "Maybe not, but apparently to many out side of the SK system you do. You go on to make a lot of inferences and innuendo that everyone else would shun people because they have some blemishes on their background and wouldn't get a fair shake from some of the rest of us here."

                    That's YOUR false projection, not mine. My post never said 'everyone else'.

                    I wrote:"it is possible that many here may have shunned them" There's enough qualifiers in that sentence to suggest no absolutes unless one is determined to alter the actual meaning of the phrase.

                    You changed it to "everyone".

                    "Again, the question was about what sort of responsibility do you (anyone) take for what you teach. And we aren't talking about underwater basket weaving here. You touch on it at a few points. The rest is just diatribe and putting down others in a back handed manner. I have had good exchanges with you in the past. I've also had exchanges that run like this one when you get all defensive."

                    You call it defensive- I call it corrective.
                    I tend to define what I wrote in contrast to someone else's misinterpretation of it. Another time I get CORRECTIVE is when certain individual's alter words like "some' to mean 'everyone' which changes the whole meaning of my post.

                    Also when posters get insulted at false premises they have already formed in their minds:

                    putting down others in a back handed manner.

                    In return they mask their backhanded comments in the guise of humor:
                    "Very true. And "All blade, all the time" would be considered pretty nutjob to the rest of the world as well. "

                    Yeah- but we're proud nutjobs.

                    "In the words of the immortal Sgt. Hulka,"Lighten up Francis"

                    From the words of Jim Croce- "Don't spit into the wind"

                    --Rafael--
                    SAYOC KALI
                    -----------
                    ----------
                    --------
                    ---------

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Now that's not a bash, but a fact. Why are you irked by it?

                      Irked? Not at all. It's a straight forward question that was inspired by Mr. Brewers post. It was a Pretty straight forward and valid question that I wanted to ask others about and see what type of feed back came in.

                      The exact question was:

                      A good question came up on another thread about the morality involved in teaching blade work. I would like to throw that same question out here, though not necessarily system specific (which is why I started it here as opposed to weighing on that thread).

                      To the instructors (or anyone else that wants to voice an opinion), what if anything do you look for in a student before teaching blade specific techniques? Obviously those of us in the FFA’s spend a lot more time with the blade than other MA’s out there. Many of the systems are based solely on blade dynamics (though there are a number of systems that have turned into basically “stick” arts). I know of some instructors who go straight to the blade from day one. Others take the more traditional approach of working from solo baton, to double baton, espada y daga, single blade, double blade, and then to open hand and ground fighting. Obviously what we teach and train is very dangerous in the wrong hands.


                      If I wanted to address it to Sayoc in particular, I would have posted it there. If you go back and read through out this thread, there are many instances of my asking straight forward questions to anyone who cares to answer. There weren't any Sayoc threads going then. Mr. Brewer could have been asking about any other system and I still would have posed the question.

                      So in some of your on topic responces:

                      On topic:

                      As far as Sayoc Kali screening is concerned, in a seminar atmosphere- attendees are videotaped and archived as attending the seminar (so we can go back ten years and see if the person actually attended or not - visual proof is easier to identify for sure), next - students sign several documents and are asked to fill out a 'profile' (again for our archives). And unless the student is Military or an LEO they are finger printed. Not to show how 'deadly' they are, but that we keep track of who comes and goes in our records. So if you do something 'nutty' we can assist the PTB in tracking you down. The way we screen dissuades some who are already kinda 'nutty' or have some aversion of being tracked.

                      In addition to the seminar and introductory archiving, The system itself is a screening process. In Sayoc Kali, it is designed to bring the student along in a manner that responsibility, and advancement is earned through actions and dedicated training. That's part of the evolution. Another is that a student has an instructor that vouches for the student. One can not be a full time Sayoc student without the sponsorship of a higher up. It's treated like an apprenticeship program. Old warrior societies had a similar setup. That was how they got better.


                      Running off topic or alternate agenda (this would get too long if I include all of them):

                      The very CULTURE of the FILIPINOS have been the blood of those before us who passed on this knowledge of the knife. It wasn't a secret society BS either - EVERYONE back then had access to a blade.

                      Think about it- when another culture came to oppress them- the oppressors ALREADY had weapons of their own. They didn't need to learn what the Filipinos had.

                      Now translate it to our way of life.

                      A criminal doesn't NEED videos, books or seminars to use a knife.
                      They never had.
                      They never did.
                      They never will.

                      CRIMINALS have knives and weapons already.

                      The good guys need to learn it.

                      And if all you good guys don't know what the criminals know then do not blame the people above offering you the opportunities to learn it. No matter what system or style is listed above- they are teaching because there's a need for it.

                      Are we all sure this is a FILIPINO MARTIAL ARTS forum?

                      Depends if you think what's on the videos and seminars are "serious". From my POV the Sayoc Kali DVDs are designed as an introduction to our knife system. We've gotten great response, because the attendees and buyers were satisfied with how the blade "chaos" is deconstructed. Some may feel this is high end blade work being sold but from our POV it is LONG OVERDUE blade work being taught at an introductory level. One has to wonder why the fuss- this should be basic knife material?

                      This is where I feel many have misperceptions of the Sayoc Kali system (I can only speak from our POV). Having 'little thought' in our blade system is not what other critics have tried to pass off. Some even said it was ineffective until they actually took a class, word has spread and it seems another marketing agenda is at hand.

                      The ONE nutcase you THINK might go postal should NOT dissuade the REST of the responsible public from learning what they sought to learn. We have to get away from this victim mentality.
                      And contrary to what we see in films or read- the NUTCASES can NOT be screened so easily- and what defines a nutcase is based on the context of someone's perspective.

                      In the General PUBLIC's POV- you training in ANY effective Martial Art is considered pretty nutty.

                      We've had students come in with dubious backgrounds and it is possible that many here may have shunned them, but we're not looking for surface cues. We're looking for the student we can bring along and teach the proper methods of belonging in this day's society. If we don't take them in and show them a positive system then it isn't going to help anyone in the long run.

                      They are given a chance.

                      One of those important lessons is to give them responsibility and treat them as adults, not sheep that we have to shield from other systems or other methods of training. We do not give them the "US versus THEM" treatment.

                      If anyone out there is looking for good knife training dvds then check sayoc.com out.

                      All my fellow 'nutjobs' are welcome.

                      A nutjob is a subjective term ... to the rest of the world- someone in this forum called DEFEND.net reading a FMA forum and following a thread on KNIFE is a definite nutjob.


                      Anything beyond the original question (see above) you have replied as though it was a slant on Sayoc, or a dig on other systems.

                      However not all statistics hold your premise up. There are as many 'nut jobs' WITHIN families that cause domestic homicides or homicides from people that are 'friends'. Sometimes no apparent clue until way later in their training. Well beyond the seminar or dvd stage. IF a blatant 'nutjob' enters a Sayoc seminar they are not going to go beyond that seminar. They will be asked to leave.

                      The first part is not something I asked or reffered to.

                      This is where I feel many have misperceptions of the Sayoc Kali system (I can only speak from our POV). Having 'little thought' in our blade system is not what other critics have tried to pass off. Some even said it was ineffective until they actually took a class, word has spread and it seems another marketing agenda is at hand.

                      Seems to be a conspiracy theory.

                      The ONE nutcase you THINK might go postal should NOT dissuade the REST of the responsible public from learning what they sought to learn. We have to get away from this victim mentality.

                      No one suggested it.

                      One of those important lessons is to give them responsibility and treat them as adults, not sheep that we have to shield from other systems or other methods of training. We do not give them the "US versus THEM" treatment.

                      Again, no one suggested it.

                      Again, it was a basic question in the same vein of other questions I have asked before on this thread. If you are bent on making more of it than there is...have fun.

                      Back to work. If you want to keep going I'll weigh in later.

                      William (Not "irked" at all)

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        "Irked? Not at all. It's a straight forward question that was inspired by Mr. Brewers post. It was a Pretty straight forward and valid question that I wanted to ask others about and see what type of feed back came in."

                        It usually sounds like someone is irked when they begin wrongly accusing people of 'backhanded bashings'. If that's not an irked comment then we can move on. Another would be when they start bandying the terms 'defensive' around to dissuade any responses to the contrary.

                        "If I wanted to address it to Sayoc in particular, I would have posted it there. If you go back and read through out this thread, there are many instances of my asking straight forward questions to anyone who cares to answer. "

                        I did not reply to this thread until it was revived and the specific system answers I had were in response to you capitalizing the word "YOU" BOLDLY to your response to my first post.

                        Check again.

                        Therefore by doing that it was specifically addressed to me and my reply was based on my experience as a Sayoc Kali instructor. Nothing more.

                        "Running off topic or alternate agenda (this would get too long if I include all of them):"

                        Or it would show that you played fast and loose with interpreting my words. Altering 'some' to mean 'everyone' etc.

                        YOU ask for specific instances of morality at play in teaching knife work thru seminars and tapes. I offered SPECIFIC instances in the form of how people have responded to Sayoc Kali (which somehow translates to mean another agenda, when you just asked to reply from MY perspective...odd):

                        ME: "This is where I feel many have misperceptions of the Sayoc Kali system (I can only speak from our POV). Having 'little thought' in our blade system is not what other critics have tried to pass off. Some even said it was ineffective until they actually took a class, word has spread and it seems another marketing agenda is at hand."

                        Now YOU interpret the above as off topic, yet it also addresses fully how morality is questioned as a marketing tool- it is a form of a shell game, how some people have thought about the screening process being bypassed and how it is incorrect.

                        I then explained that some of these people asking had not even done their homework on Sayoc Kali.

                        A straight forward commentary of how these topics are sometimes placed with another agenda in mind. You chose to slant it as being 'defensive'... That wasn't coming from me. It can be UNIVERSAL to all MAs, I just chose to list the Sayoc POV. The qualifier 'POV' was placed there so that I could avoid a blanket inferrence which you ignored anyway.

                        We have seen questions about morality, how screening is NOT addressed and other subjects as marketing ploys used by others in the past in our Sayoc site.

                        I never said it was YOUR marketing ploy. I was offering that these types of threads are often placed in forums and when we checked they were taken straight out of someone's commercial knife site where they sell their own videos and tapes.

                        The comment was a VALID addition to the whole thread. It wasn't meant to surpass the existing posts in this thread but a different view of how these threads MAY be originated.

                        Which is why I asked, why there's such a fuss these days on screening and video instruction on 'serious' knife techniques when it has been the NORM for many decades in the MAs world?

                        One legitimate observation is that it is also a lame marketing tool to suggest one instructor isn't upholding their 'moral' duty and someone else (usually another system's instructor) is.

                        You can choose to invalidate it, but it fits in the thread and has no reference to YOU specifically. In fact, it doesn't refer to anyone here specifically at all. For some reason, you don't like this additional comment and chose to say it has no merit. Even when you commented thusly:

                        "just maybe a bit of thought put into who you teach what. EVERYONE still has access to a blade. Teaching people just makes them more efficient and effective with them."

                        ---------
                        "Anything beyond the original question (see above) you have replied as though it was a slant on Sayoc, or a dig on other systems."

                        I've already displayed the liberty you take with my wordings, so that's your misinterpretation of it, yes.

                        Speaking of digs on OTHER systems, I like what you wrote here:

                        "That is why I started this thread in the first place. I've seen too many students and instructors dealing with blade work like it's just another innocuous tool that you just do technique 1A-B-or C, or kick out of someones hand...lickety-split, just like that. This type of crud does build a flase sense of security, and in the case of the instructor mentioned, very well may have gotten the student killed."
                        ------

                        ME: However not all statistics hold your premise up. There are as many 'nut jobs' WITHIN families that cause domestic homicides or homicides from people that are 'friends'. Sometimes no apparent clue until way later in their training. Well beyond the seminar or dvd stage. IF a blatant 'nutjob' enters a Sayoc seminar they are not going to go beyond that seminar. They will be asked to leave.

                        "The first part is not something I asked or reffered to."

                        You didn't ask, but your very question refers to ALL sides of the discussion. I merely expanded the narrow parameters of your comments.

                        It is something that needs to be added into the equation of screening and an instructor's moral responsibility in teaching the knife.

                        The fact that teaching the knife doesn't mean only a stranger might kill you as you implied by saying teaching outsiders through videos and seminars would do. What my reference to domestic / acquaintance knife homicides indicates is that an instructor really has no control of their student's actions.

                        That responsibility can be discussed (as they are in seminars and videos) but in relation to REAL knife incidents, the instructors have little to do with how the instruction altered the criminal mindset or bad intention of the knife attacker.

                        You can choose to invalidate my comment.
                        It does not erase the fact that there's no statistic that states that knife (seminar/video) instruction of a SERIOUS kind (whatever that is) EVER instigated, was behind or fueled a knife attack.

                        So if there's any legitimate information which backs this need to hold off on seminars and videos because it MIGHT reach the wrong hands then let's see it.

                        What usually fuels knife attacks are not instructional videos or seminars- far from it - most knife attacks are factors of personal and environmental settings.

                        Attackers don't need 'serious' knife instruction to take a huge percentage of the population out. Innocent people need it to defend against ANY knife attack.

                        Screening and Responsibility have always been the case in the Sayoc Kali system (from my POV) so from your question I am answering that what can be done has already been done, and stopping the knife instruction to the outside world will not alter the REAL world of knife attacks.

                        "Seems to be a conspiracy theory."

                        Another way to invalidate a legitimate OBSERVATION.

                        "No one suggested it."

                        Then I suppose the comment on 'occasional nutjobs' was not your post.
                        Example:

                        ""I'm talking about today, and about the occasional nut job that comes looking for and is fixated on "killer blade techniques" and nothing else. Or even the short tempered, emotional out burst guy with no control."

                        Which you then followed with:

                        Are you telling me that you would have no reservations in teaching people like this today, in a civilian society?
                        ME: One of those important lessons is to give them responsibility and treat them as adults, not sheep that we have to shield from other systems or other methods of training. We do not give them the "US versus THEM" treatment.

                        "Again, no one suggested it."

                        It is an observation I made, which does not require your permission nor suggestion.

                        "Again, it was a basic question in the same vein of other questions I have asked before on this thread. If you are bent on making more of it than there is...have fun."

                        Your comments are here for everyone to discern.
                        My intent is not to make it MORE but to offer the readers a clear indication of what I wrote, not your misinterpretation of them.
                        Your choice to continue doing so.

                        --Rafael--
                        Sayoc Kali
                        ---------
                        ---------
                        --------

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          I wrote a very long reply (much longer than this one) to your last post and
                          decided to sit on it for a couple of days before responding. After thinking
                          about it for a while, I decided not to post it and just touch on a couple
                          of points which I feel got it/kept it going.

                          I say that I started this last question in this thread because of a question
                          that popped up in another thread. I felt that it was a good and relevant
                          question that could be posed regardless of systems (but was system specific
                          on that thread).

                          You felt it was a slam that I tried to continue here and came over to ferret
                          it out.

                          Which piggy backs this thread to one that was initially negatively slanted
                          against Sayoc Kali. You took a thread that has pretty much worked it's way
                          out and revived it in here


                          I took a good and valid question that was
                          originally asked there and
                          brought it here, open to anyone, with no reference to SK and asked others
                          which I have done
                          many times before on this thread. Why would you think it's a slam on SK?
                          When have I ever done that before? I have had a number of constructive
                          interactions with other SK practitioners without slamming them. You can even
                          see a number of interactions through out this whole "knife" thread with no
                          animosity what so ever toward SK contributors. What makes you think I would
                          all of a sudden do that? Why are you so insistent in thinking it's a slam?

                          There is really only one time that I've "gone off" on this forum and that
                          was during the Kali debate....which incidentally, you complimented me on. Now
                          out of almost 380 posts, that doesn't really indicate a pattern of "just
                          going off".

                          In your replies, I felt that you were taking some backhanded jabs.

                          Some may feel this is high end blade work being sold but from our POV it
                          is LONG OVERDUE blade work being taught at an introductory level. One has to
                          wonder why the fuss- this should be basic knife material? >>

                          word has spread and it seems another marketing agenda is at hand

                          We've had students come in with dubious backgrounds and it is possible that
                          many here may have shunned them,

                          One of those important lessons is to give them responsibility and treat them
                          as adults, not sheep that we have to shield from other systems or other
                          methods of training. We do not give them the "US versus THEM" treatment


                          Now, I could very well
                          be wrong, but I seem to remember a bit of that type of thing going on
                          toward others in
                          the Pekiti/Dekiti/Sayoc threads that went on on your forum last year
                          sometime. Those threads were pulled a long time ago so I can't go back and
                          check them. I felt that that was what you were doing once you got here. If
                          I'm wrong then
                          I can own up to that...but I'm not so sure that I am. That's just my
                          opinion.

                          In return they mask their backhanded comments in the guise of humor:
                          "Very true. And "All blade, all the time" would be considered pretty nutjob
                          to the rest of the world as well.


                          That was just a tongue & cheek retort to your backhanded statement about a thread I started:

                          A nutjob is a subjective term ... to the rest of the world- someone in
                          this forum called DEFEND.net reading a FMA forum and following a thread on
                          KNIFE is a definite nutjob.


                          Though like it or not, both statements are true. Both would seem whacked by
                          the majority of folks in the rest of the world.

                          I wrote:
                          "I agree. No one suggested not teaching, just being a little cautious and
                          getting to know them before running off to the carotid arteries."

                          It was a tongue and cheek statement that in hindsight was not a good one.

                          That's YOUR false projection, not mine. My post never said 'everyone
                          else'.I wrote:"it is possible that many here may have shunned them" There's
                          enough qualifiers in that sentence to suggest no absolutes unless one is
                          determined to alter the actual meaning of the phrase.

                          You changed it to "everyone".


                          My mistake in paraphrasing instead of quoting directly. It's was not
                          intentional. Though yes, as I stated above, I felt you were taking a jab.


                          You even refer it (see above).

                          Yes, you were trying to claim that we (us here...see below) "blame" others.
                          I used Mr. Brewers name in only citing the question which I also state at
                          the beginning of the thread to get you back to the question...as opposed to
                          the blame game.

                          And if all you good guys don't know what the criminals know then do not
                          blame the people above offering you the opportunities to learn it. No matter
                          what system or style is listed above- they are teaching because there's a
                          need for it....



                          ....Our knife material isn't going to cause them to become criminals if
                          they
                          are already in that dark place. They will not be any less dangerous because
                          they got a video- they already were


                          I didn't claim that it would cause them to become criminals. The point of my
                          question was what if anything do you do to find out if a person might
                          already be in that "dark place"? A fairly recent example of someone using
                          what many would believe to be controversial materials (and many outside of
                          what
                          we train and teach would feel what we do is quite controversial) to kill was
                          using the
                          paladin press book about being a hitman. The book didn't make him commit
                          the crime, he committed the crime using the material as a guide.

                          Library Journal Junior Library Guild, jlg, library, librarian, books, collection development, reading categories, reading levels.



                          An excerpt:
                          >>Paladin lawyers claimed the book was intended for a wide audience
                          including crime buffs and mystery writers and said there were few
                          similarities between Perry's crimes and the book.
                          >>

                          In other words, "good guys", not bad guys. Do you think that if someone were
                          to claim that they used a video of knife techniques or knife fighting to
                          learn how to kill, the outside world is going to understand that it is
                          really meant
                          just for the "good guys". Again, I'm not suggesting that blade work not be
                          taught at all. But in light of the current litigious and "not my fault"
                          society in the U.S., steps to try to be responsible in who the material is
                          presented to
                          is a prudent measure IMHO. In one case, a very good instructor that I know
                          looked past warning signs in teaching someone because this person was a
                          distant relative. The crime this person committed was not blade
                          related...yet there were deaths involved. They tried to claim that the
                          reason why he committed the crime was because he was "taught to kill" by this
                          instructor who taught with only the best intentions in giving this person
                          tools to defend himself with.


                          Also when posters get insulted at false premises they have already formed
                          in their minds


                          Maybe, but that can also be applied to your coming over here with the "false
                          premise" that it was a slam on SK. You felt it was a slam coming in, I felt
                          you made some slams after you got here.


                          You referred to SERIOUS Knife work.
                          And again, my reply is any knife work is SERIOUS. That's why I was trying to
                          delineate what you meant about UN- Serious knife work. Now you mention
                          teaching ADVANCED Knifework in seminars and videos... and I reply that
                          what's in OUR tapes and seminars was NOT Advanced.

                          Now that's not a bash, but a fact. Why are you irked by it?


                          I'm not "irked" by it. I haven't seen your videos or attended any of your
                          seminars. And yes, all knife work is (and if you have read through out this
                          entire thread, you will see that I consider it as such) serious. Now,
                          whether you
                          have a formally structured knife system or not, there are levels to teach.
                          You have to walk before you can run. Since I haven't seen your material, I
                          don't know what you consider "advanced" blade work. But every system has a
                          structure and you have to have a beginning level. I just asked what you (and
                          anyone else) do, if anything before going beyond that.

                          In fact the original post I had added the SIMILARITIES that just about ALL
                          MAs systems have taught seminars and tapes on the knife. They are ALL
                          serious and none of them are ADVANCED.

                          Happy?

                          Now if that sounds defensive- it isn't. It is an observation that is
                          backed by years of ads for seminars and tapes from just about every knife
                          system imaginable. Now before you see that as a bash (which it isn't), it is
                          saying that no well known knife system is innocent of NOT teaching thru
                          seminars and tapes


                          Bash? No SH, I don't.

                          But which is a more productive (from the students POV), Going to
                          weekly classes with instructors from your exampled systems, or going to a
                          couple of seminars a year. Obviously the student is going to pick up and
                          understand much more than watching a video or being one out of 20, 30, 40 or
                          more people. On the flip side, the instructor is able to get to know the
                          student a heck of allot better than (just for example) student #234 in Butte,
                          Montana that the instructor saw twice for maybe a total of ten hours in a
                          seminar setting in one year. This would put you in a much better position to
                          know who you are teaching to. And because, as we both know, and you have
                          stated a number of times, all blade work is serious. It should be taught
                          hands on with a skilled instructor as much as possible. It's to easy for new
                          students/non martial arts types to misunderstand material and miss nuances
                          of working with a blade by watching video alone. Now, couple that with
                          seminars,
                          it's a better scenario, but still lacking next to regular qualified
                          instruction. I know there are many people out there who don't have qualified
                          instructors near them to get that type of training, and that's where the
                          video and/or seminar training is meant to fill the void. But it also means
                          you don't always have a good handle on exactly who you are teaching to.
                          Unless you have qualified instructors in those areas to oversee (which in
                          some cases you said you do) the training and to vouch for them, you won't.
                          Now, regardless of how many "knife" videos have been produced in the past,
                          present or future, betting your life that you will understand the material
                          completely without qualified instruction is not advisable. Videos are tools
                          that're best used with students who have had hands on instruction to
                          re-enforce/re-fresh the material for the student, not to learn from scratch.
                          Systems/organizations that make videos available to students only does not a
                          "secret society" make. To me it shows a modicum of responsibility in
                          disseminating material that is taught. The Pekiti-Tirsia Global Organization
                          for example is instituting background checks on students. To me this is a
                          responsible
                          step considering the nature of what we teach. And many LEO's that I have
                          worked with and spoken to about it feel the same. They would
                          hate to see the material get into the "wrong" hands and believe that some
                          form of checks should be in place. Obviously no system of checks is going to
                          be 100% fool proof, but again, considering the nature of what we teach, an
                          attempt to be responsible with the material we pass on is good.

                          You have said the criminals already know the material. I would agree that
                          many know how to ambush and shank, but skilled blade work that many of us in
                          the FMA's train? I disagree (very low percentage). It doesn't mean that
                          shanking isn't deadly,
                          obviously it is, but you can't tell me that that same person wouldn't be
                          more dangerous knowing what many of us know coupled with the lack of
                          inhibition
                          to use it only counter-offensively/defensively. Dead is dead, but more skill
                          makes them more dangerous.

                          I'm not "bashing" seminars and/or videos, I believe they have their place. I
                          just feel that there should be some form of checks (what ever they may be)
                          before getting to the meat of blade work with just anyone off the street.
                          And trying to learn by video alone is not advisable IMHO. A students time
                          would be much better spent traveling to a qualified instructor and video
                          taping their training session to re-enforce ( and re-fresh their memory) the
                          hands on they got after they get back home. It's also a better way for the
                          instructor to get an idea of where the student is at and utilize any sort of
                          checks they may use...if any.

                          William

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            William,

                            Check through the thread and my initial response. Then come back here.

                            "You felt it was a slam that I tried to continue here and came over to ferret
                            it out."


                            My first post in this thread was about the very nature of the question being addressed and I was pointing out that it didn't appear to be a topic (knife instruction through video and seminars) that FMAs and other knife instructors shied away from in the past, so what's the fuss now?

                            There was nothing that 'defended' Sayoc Kali in that post. It's something that PTK has done, and Sayoc as well as numerous systems.

                            " Why would you think it's a slam on SK? "

                            The post you quote from is further down the thread line and I believe I have already addressed that later you wrote your questions to me in BOLD asking specifically about my POV which in turn would mean the Sayoc Kali perspective. Now if you didn't like my response, then that
                            's fine- but then don't place the YOU in bold when you ask me my opinions. I already quoted the other things you're asking about...mostly misinterpretation of my comments and false premises.

                            "There is really only one time that I've "gone off" on this forum and that was during the Kali debate....which incidentally, you complimented me on. "

                            Which indicates that you were wrong in implying that I've had encounters with you which were 'defensive' in the past.

                            "... I felt that you were taking some backhanded jabs."

                            See previous posts on that. I can't help you if you did, but don't apologize for something that wasn't there NOR something that I'm not guilty of.

                            "... I seem to remember a bit of that type of thing going on toward others in the Pekiti/Dekiti/Sayoc threads that went on on your forum last year sometime. Those threads were pulled a long time ago so I can't go back and check them. I felt that that was what you were doing once you got here. If I'm wrong then I can own up to that...but I'm not so sure that I am. That's just my opinion."

                            It's your opinion so you don't need to own up to being wrong, it if you don't want to. No sweat. Btw, we pulled the thread because if you recall it was delving into personal territory between GT Gaje and his relatives which we felt disrespected both systems (Dekiti/Pekiti). They were stating things which made each other look pretty bad (without going into details in here), and we felt that as non participants in this- it shouldn't be in the Sayoc forum.

                            We respected both system enough not to allow the dirty laundry to be aired on our Sayoc Kali forums. Btw, if this feels like a tangent- don't say I brought it up.

                            I find it rather amusing, that from numerous 'backhanded comments' from numerous PTK posters from just about every forum imaginable that you would have the audacity to point a finger at me as an instigator. Just look all over the web and read the headings of some of these posts... it's quite glaring to any outsider.

                            You won't see ONE topic heading bashing PTK or any system coming from a Sayoc Kali rep. Not ONE.

                            "That was just a tongue & cheek retort to your backhanded statement about a thread I started:"

                            ME: A nutjob is a subjective term ... to the rest of the world- someone in this forum called DEFEND.net reading a FMA forum and following a thread on KNIFE is a definite nutjob.

                            "Though like it or not, both statements are true. Both would seem whacked by the majority of folks in the rest of the world."

                            ummm... I think most of us got the joke the first time I wrote it, and it was self deprecating humor that focused on everyone on the forum NOT a backhanded joke on you who started the thread. That's a projection, I referred to those who were READING the forum.

                            "... I felt you were taking a jab."

                            Again your opinion- I disagree.

                            "Yes, you were trying to claim that we (us here...see below) "blame" others.I used Mr. Brewers name in only citing the question which I also state at the beginning of the thread to get you back to the question...as opposed to the blame game."

                            And if all you good guys don't know what the criminals know then do not
                            blame the people above offering you the opportunities to learn it. No matter
                            what system or style is listed above- they are teaching because there's a
                            need for it....


                            Which in turn supports the fact that I wasn't refering to Sayoc Kali specifically in a defensive manner in my initial post. It was a qualified statement, using a universal phrase. "NO MATTER WHAT SYSTEM OR STYLE IS LISTED ABOVE..."

                            How you get an initial defensive Sayoc Kali statement/agenda from that is beyond me.

                            continued

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              "I didn't claim that it would cause them to become criminals. The point of my
                              question was what if anything do you do to find out if a person might
                              already be in that "dark place"?"


                              We can split hairs all we want, but again my reply is that you don't, and you never will. No matter how many background checks you do. The only way you MIGHT stop a student from commiting a crime with a knife is if you don't teach it.... at all. And even that doesn't mean they won't use a knife- you're just dissolving your input on teaching others how to survive against one.

                              Now they can still commit a crime with their bare hands and a bludgeoning weapon... you as an instructor have to rely on the fact that you have no control of anyone.

                              Look at any 'morality' based system that's on this planet... if they can't do it, then a martial arts instructor should stick to what they do best... martial arts. Leave the morality to the professionals. Place a disclaimer and allow the student to know they are responsible for their own actions.

                              "A fairly recent example of someone usingwhat many would believe to be controversial materials (and many outside of
                              what we train and teach would feel what we do is quite controversial) to kill was using the paladin press book about being a hitman. The book didn't make him commit the crime, he committed the crime using the material as a guide."


                              No one is claiming to teach "hitman' techniques here, so I think this example is kinda moot. Also, you answered your own question. The book didn't make him commit the crime... just like John Wayne films don't make you kill Indians.

                              "In other words, "good guys", not bad guys. Do you think that if someone were to claim that they used a video of knife techniques or knife fighting to learn how to kill, the outside world is going to understand that it is really meant just for the "good guys".

                              Let's see William, if you were in court how YOU answer this. I think the defense for it is self evident.

                              "Again, I'm not suggesting that blade work not be
                              taught at all. But in light of the current litigious and "not my fault"
                              society in the U.S., steps to try to be responsible in who the material is
                              presented to is a prudent measure IMHO. In one case, a very good instructor that I know looked past warning signs in teaching someone because this person was a distant relative. The crime this person committed was not blade related...yet there were deaths involved. They tried to claim that the
                              reason why he committed the crime was because he was "taught to kill" by this instructor who taught with only the best intentions in giving this person
                              tools to defend himself with."


                              Which again supports my statement that it isn't the material, but the way a defense will twist ANY background to suit their case. They don't want their boy to go to prison or take responsibility for his actions therefore they blame others. The instructors were just convenient, the case would be slanted to anything that the attorney's feel will support their case.... rock music, bad hair day...etc.


                              "Maybe, but that can also be applied to your coming over here with the "falsepremise" that it was a slam on SK. You felt it was a slam coming in, I felt you made some slams after you got here."

                              Nope, read my first post. No referral to that at all. I said it was a topic that is somewhat odd to read about in a knife forum that's FMAs oriented since just about everyone's system would be guilty of doing the very practice you listed.

                              Only later, did you ask specifically about Sayoc Kali and when I responded- you thought I was being defensive when I added that the very question can also be a lame marketing agenda used by others in the past.

                              "I haven't seen your videos or attended any of your
                              seminars. And yes, all knife work is (and if you have read through out this
                              entire thread, you will see that I consider it as such) serious."


                              Buy the DVD / attend a seminar and find out.

                              "...whether you have a formally structured knife system or not, there are levels to teach."

                              I disagree, I think a deifinition of non structured system would be that it doesn't have levels. See your own following comment:

                              "You have to walk before you can run. Since I haven't seen your material, I don't know what you consider "advanced" blade work. But every system has a structure and you have to have a beginning level. I just asked what you (and anyone else) do, if anything before going beyond that."

                              I listed SOME of them already.

                              "But which is a more productive (from the students POV), Going to
                              weekly classes with instructors from your exampled systems, or going to a
                              couple of seminars a year."


                              Ahhh, that's an entirely different topic William. That wasn't what you asked initially, you were skirting around the perimeter of it.

                              "Obviously the student is going to pick up and
                              understand much more than watching a video or being one out of 20, 30, 40 or more people. On the flip side, the instructor is able to get to know the
                              student a heck of allot better than (just for example) student #234 in Butte,
                              Montana that the instructor saw twice for maybe a total of ten hours in a
                              seminar setting in one year."


                              What makes this so obvious?
                              First we have to lay down the foundation of what the content of the video entails compared to what a daily class with other instructors?

                              Therefore this could easily lead to bashing another system or school would it not? maybe we need to rethink before we go into that.

                              Only then should we take it to the next level:
                              1. point out if an instructor considers whether a daily, private, video or a seminar student benefit equally
                              2. If an instructor is morally obligated to teaching courses for each specified manner.

                              We should aslso include:

                              1. Advantages in learning from video.
                              2. Advantages in learning from Seminars
                              3. Advantages in learning from private.
                              4. Advantages in learning from full time (which you already did)

                              Now since you see the disadvantages, what would be the advantages of the others from your perspective?

                              " It's to easy for new students/non martial arts types to misunderstand material and miss nuances of working with a blade by watching video alone."

                              What if:

                              1. You can replay, slo mo the nuances
                              2. See it at different angles (close up, overhead, mirror etc.)
                              3. Train at your own pace and not at the student with the Bruce Lee learning curve.
                              4. Email the instructor or ALL the licensed instructors for input for specific questions.

                              Are these also not advantages?

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                "Now, couple that with seminars,
                                it's a better scenario, but still lacking next to regular qualified
                                instruction. I know there are many people out there who don't have qualified
                                instructors near them to get that type of training, and that's where the
                                video and/or seminar training is meant to fill the void."


                                Which is why I feel it is universal to all instructors who've offered such instruction through these methods regardless of system and style.

                                "Now, regardless of how many "knife" videos have been produced in the past, present or future, betting your life that you will understand the material completely without qualified instruction is not advisable. Videos are tools that're best used with students who have had hands on instruction to re-enforce/re-fresh the material for the student, not to learn from scratch."

                                Which is why I found this topic rather moot.
                                Who doesn't think supplementing training is a bad idea?
                                No one ever suggested the video training is COMPLETE.

                                "The Pekiti-Tirsia Global Organization
                                for example is instituting background checks on students. To me this is a
                                responsible step considering the nature of what we teach."


                                Let me play devil's advocate:

                                1. How does this stop any lawyer from slanting the actual instruction as something detrimental to the student if he does commit a crime? Wouldn't it still be something that any lawyer could utilize in their assessment?

                                2. How does this absolve PTK from the past thirty years of not using background checks (since you wrote "instigating" which I understand as something 'new') if one of their previous instructors or student's student commits a knife related crime?

                                3. Wouldn't this 'instigation' also fall into the marketing agenda I referred to earlier?
                                Now that PTK has 'instigated' background checks, it is rather convenient that it's now of some concern to presume OTHERs are not doing likewise? I found the question moot since one has to assume background checks weren't being done by anyone else.


                                "And many LEO's that I have worked with and spoken to about it feel the same. They would hate to see the material get into the "wrong" hands and believe that some form of checks should be in place."

                                Here's where our idealogies possibly separate William.

                                The criminal doesn't care about checks.
                                They can already kill a majority of the unarmed populace with a blade.
                                We tell LEOs that
                                1. There's no skill in REAL life knife attacks.
                                2. There's only skill in SURVIVING them.
                                3. No one ever died from a skilled knife attack... they died because the victim wasn't SKILLED enough to SURVIVE it.

                                What the attacker needs:
                                Able body
                                Criminal mindset
                                Intent to kill
                                Victim
                                Knife

                                Here's the 'advanced' skill required to kill victim with a knife:
                                1. Stab at all the areas that are stabbable
                                2. Repeat til victim is dead.

                                Within those two prerequisites lies all the advanced knife work a person needs.
                                They don't need footwork patterns,
                                they don't need checking drills,
                                they don't need angles of attack.
                                etc.

                                The Victim NEEDs those skills. This in turn will turn them into someone who can :
                                1. Access the situation quickly
                                2. Respond correctly
                                3. Survive the attack.

                                LOOK at ALL your drills- they are to make sure you stop the other guy from doing the above two 'skills' I listed.

                                If they aren't doing that, then they are not good drills.

                                The drills may seem complex but that's becuase we're breaking down micro seconds into trainable, modular components.

                                The only check LEOs have is to learn how to survive a knife attack. Any other check is mere surface ornament, outside of banning edged 'weapons' to the public... if that.

                                " Dead is dead, but more skill
                                makes them more dangerous.""


                                From the mindset of a Feeder based system like Sayoc Kali:
                                Don't worry about what the criminal knows.
                                Accept that they are the BEST there is and then go from that.
                                You don't have much time otherwise.

                                It is up to the student to have a say on his survival.
                                How SKILLED they are determines the outcome...NOT the attacker's skill.
                                It is granted that the attacker knows more than you might know.

                                If you don't think that, and you assume the attacker to be a lower level of skill then you're giving him the advantage.

                                If you think the attacker will learn something the rest of us don't know, then that means we need to find out who does know these skills and see if we can get access to their methods.

                                Now who would know this stuff the rest of us don't know or are unwilling to teach the outside world?

                                Maybe those who do NOT offer seminars or videos.
                                ahh.. but there's the rub...

                                It starts to look like a marketing campaign or what could be called a defensive marketing strategy...

                                We can certainly invalidate it by relegating it to paranoia... but let's look clearly at all the people who have posted such items and see if it doesn't apply?

                                However, if that's not the case (which I was giving the forum the benefit of the doubt) thus the inital comment of what the fuss is all about?

                                --Rafael--
                                --------
                                --------
                                -------
                                -----

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X