Originally posted by Hikage
I think we both agree (at least at a basic level) That techniques that rely on exact timing, precise targeting, and flawless execution are less desirable than ones that don’t have to be so neat and tidy.
I also disagree that finesse techniques while being harder to accomplish will be any more effective against Bubba then you’re so called head hunting. What you really need is a baseball bat, a heavy chair, or a .44 Magnum, anything less will probably mean a trip to the hospital or morgue. The way to defeat him empty handed is to be meaner, nastier, and go for his eyes, throat, groin, and hit him as many times as you, can, for as long as you can. But even then there are no guarantees.
I agree here about the off balancing your opponent, but again I disagree on how. I think that having the aim of going after the arm complicates your task. Great in theory but the reality is you don’t want to complicate things anymore than you have too. Now if it happens naturally, like if he grabs onto you leaving his arm vulnerable then fine, but I’d rather palm strike him, head but, or stick my thumbs in his eyes. Offset his balance by movement making him re-adjust to you, or by shocking/shredding can also be a great way to off balancing him without resorting to fine motor techniques.
And the Kenpo thing I studied it for about 2 ½ years. I think pressure point fighting has some merit, but again it won't work well cosistantly enough when someone is lowering the shoulder closing like a banchee, and throwing a barrage of punches at you.
Comment