If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
In C2 we train to hit with a repeated shot. Imagine something similar to right cross, right cross, right cross, right cross...... Now that's harldy a flow, as it isn't what many would regard as a combination. And it isn't a single shot.... rather a single shot time and time again.
Yes, it is best if the first one does the job. If it does? Then fine. But, if not? The next one is going in, as is the next.
If it is worth hitting once, it is worth hitting twice.
Musashi advocates the same thing in 5 Rings, always being ready to attack again along the same path.
i believe in the one shot one kill but i tend to flow several one shot one kill techniques until the guy goes down. besides, when i fight, i am usually pissed so only hitting him once would going easy on him lol
besides, some ppl can take more punishment. a bodybuilder can probably takea punchto the solar plexus more then a library nerd
i believe in the one shot one kill but i tend to flow several one shot one kill techniques until the guy goes down. besides, when i fight, i am usually pissed so only hitting him once would going easy on him lol
besides, some ppl can take more punishment. a bodybuilder can probably takea punchto the solar plexus more then a library nerd
Bareknuckles is totally different from even the smallest gloves.
I like the C2 (Musashi) approach as well. If you've hit one area once then do it again and again and again. I like the easy combos you learn in boxing and MT as well. Simple, natural, fast and powerful.
This one hit wonder bullshit may work as a sucker punch but squared off with someone it's pretty unlikely. Mike Brewer once said that "anywhere is a pressure point if you hit it hard enough"......I quite like that.
O.K. for you strikers on the fourm which do you believe is a more sound principle, Flow or one punch, one kill?
All depends on the discipline. Even though it is not a street combative art, what we do is very much a one hit principle. There is zero requirement for 'flow'.
The original question:All depends on the discipline. Even though it is not a street combative art, what we do is very much a one hit principle. There is zero requirement for 'flow'.
Traditional or not; I have to believe that everyone studying anytype of martial art has as a primary or secondary goal----"To be able to defend myself in a street altercation"
Hmm, not sure how the police would view your theory if it was applied to my art. They would probably frown on my razor-sharp-sword street-altercation-defence...
In the past I have done a lot of time on the mat. These days - just weapons.
Hmm, not sure how the police would view your theory if it was applied to my art. They would probably frown on my razor-sharp-sword street-altercation-defence...
In the past I have done a lot of time on the mat. These days - just weapons.
Well if your attacker has his own weapon (hopefully a firearm) then you meet force with force. You are still on the defense. Especially if you have more than one attacker. <<<Legal angle>>>>>
Comment