The fact is that it's irrelevant how effective Aikido is for disarming sword-wielding opponents cause the fact is THERE ARE NO SWORD-WIELDING OPPONENTS!
However, it is supposition that no one trains against resisting partners. I do this all the time. My brother, who trained in Aikido, also did this all the time. Call it freakish, rare, an anomoly, whatever. It happened. He only studied for two years, though. His dojo was in Owensburgh, KT.
That there are no sword-wielding adversaries is of little concern. Sufficiently intelligent students can adapt many tactics and techniques from many different martial arts and make them work in modern situations.
No one wants to go up against a gun without a gun. But if those are the cards you are dealt . . .

And I have to keep coming back to the point of the thread. It wasn't to prove or disprove Aikido's efficiency or value in the modern world. We were just asked if it could complement BJJ. Maybe. It would take two arms, two legs, and an open mind. I know of a Shotokan dojo near me that already mixes in Aikido, and they've been very effective against kickboxers (not point sparring, full contact).
For some reason, they seem to produce effective fighters within 2-4 years, depending on personal commitment. I've sparred with some of them to train for patron boxing bouts, and they aren't a joke.
As for why to train Aikido? Maybe, just maybe, its fun.
If all I wanted was self-defense, I'd get a concealed firearms permit and buy a gun. Proof against rabid Karatekas everywhere

Respect.
Comment