Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BJJ - should you be taken down?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BJJ - should you be taken down?

    Hi guys,

    As you are probably aware i am an internal arts fan!! But i also do have great great respect for the arts of BJJ and MT that are so popular on this forum.

    anyway here are some thoughts.

    While the west (especially the U.S.) was learning how to " dance " Wu Shu, the BJJ was growing very fast in Brazil. Since the 20's (1920), the Gracie family (mainly through Helio Gracie) began to modify the old Japanese JJ into a highly efficient martial art. At that time, in Brazil, people had a wrong idea about what a true martial art should be. There, most part of the people also believed in the so called "Gong Fu or Karate" "Masters" and their fantastic techniques. Helio Gracie, Carlson Gracie, their brothers and cousins begun to show the world, that people needed more reality in what they practiced. They begun to show the world that you can't be a fighter and a dancer.


    The style they developed began to spread very fast. "Many times I couldn't make the movements my brother was teaching, because to make this movements you needed to use a lot of power, and I was a weak boy. So I began to adapt this old JJ to myself. Once someone asked me if I created a new fighting style; I just inserted a kind of a crowbar in each movement. I had to use a crowbar to be able to do what I do without using strength. And then, I reinvented the JJ" - Helio Gracie. It's important to understand then, that while the Chinese were worried about showing the world a "new" kind of Gong Fu, something beautiful and nice to see, the Gracie family was worried about developing a fighting system that could be used by any person, know matter how strong the opponent. While the Chinese were "dancing around the world," the BJJ was being tested over and over, like Helio Gracie said: "The goal of my life was to teach JJ. We needed someone to be the protector of the new BJJ, and I was this person, as a fighter. So every time someone would have doubts about my techniques, I would step in to the ring and destroy the guy, to prove the efficiency of our fight." The Gracies were fighting everyone back then: kickboxers, Gong Fu fighters, karate, Judo, wrestlers ... everyone was going down. Soon, they were in the U.S., and America found out about the Gracie JJ. And most of the guys that didn't believe in it, also went down. Rickson and Rorion Gracie fought almost everyone. They never chose the opponents. Like their father, Helio Gracie, they have the mind set of the warrior, while the people who were learning Gong Fu had the mind set of the dancers.

    Because of the almost total efficiency of BJJ and because everybody was going down, some myths were created back in the 80's and early 90's:

    1 - All the fights begin standing and end up on the ground - there is nothing you can do about it.

    2 - If a BJJ fighter takes you to the ground, then it's all over.

    3 - If a BJJ fighters achieves the "mounted" position, it's all over.

    4 - You have to learn how to fight on the ground

    5 - Mixed martial arts are the best

    These statements are, in fact, ridiculous. But I understand why most part of people believe them. Having in mind the Wu Shu dance, you really begin to think that you have to learn ground fighting and really begin to believe in these "myths." But they are not true at all. Let's analyze them.

    1 - All the fights begin standing and end on the ground - Why is that? Why do fights end up on the ground? What happens is that people, first of all, are not learning real Gong Fu, so they don't have the necessary technique to avoid being taken to the ground. In how many ways you can take a person to the ground? Mainly 3 or 4, and the other techniques are only variations. Learn how to counter these movements, like the famous "double leg" or the Brazilian JJ "baiana." They are not difficult to defend. The Gong Fu style you practice should give you tools so you can deal with this techniques. What is lacking to the Gong Fu people out there ( in terms of Xing Yi ):

    a - The mind set. The beast inside.

    b - Strong Stances - San Ti Shi training is vital here - spend a lot of time on it.

    c - Chen Jin

    d - How to Fa Jin, and how to release power using short movements.

    e - How to use elbows, knees, hips, and shoulders. The 2 man form Pi Wuxing and the bear form are to be trained very well.

    f - Reality training. Full power sparring with no protection.

    g - A good teacher.

    In case you don't lack the above mentioned things and BJJ fighters still take you to the ground, well, then, train more.

    2 & 3 - If a BJJ fighter takes you to the ground or achieve the mounted position, it's all over - So again here, we have a common problem. People don't know real Xing Yi Quan. They think they know or, worse, they are conscious they don't know but they want to fool other people. And again, what people (most people) know as Xing Yi is a lie. That's why myths like this spread so fast, because almost no one out there can prove they are only myths. If these people really know Xing Yi, they would understand that XY is not based on techniques, but rather in principles. It is in fact very simple to understand. Teachers train their student in the use of techniques that work for certain situations. At the moment their the opponent makes a different movement, they can't react , because they were not taught how to counter these movements; they didn't learn the proper techniques to apply. So at this point you can already understand that to know techniques is but a single step. More important than this, is to know the mechanics that work behind the techniques. You have to know the concepts. Concepts work in any situation; they work standing or on the ground. A very good example is about how to defend a punch. You have to look deep in to the movement (the punch) and understand that before being a punch, it's a straight force. So if you learn how to defend straight force attacks, and not only a punch, you can defend (using the same movement) a punch, a frontal kick, a side kick, a wrestlers double leg or a BJJ "baiana," for all these movements are in fact straight forces in motion. All good Xing Yi fighters know this. Well, at least they should. And more than anything principles are always principles, standing or on the ground.

    4 - You have to learn how to fight on the ground - Wrong. Totally wrong. This is exactly the mistake BJJ guys never made. High levels of skill in any martial come only through specialization in a certain art. How do you expect to be proficient in Xing Yi also learning JJ, or wrestling? Why is so easy to take the Gong Fu guys to the ground? Because they are not specialists. At the other hand, BJJ fighters spend hours and hours at BJJ schools learning... guess what? Yes, only BJJ. After a couple of years, they are specialists in BJJ. Do grapplers learn boxing techniques? Yes, they do. But just a little. They know they will always be ground fighting specialists and they understand they only have to learn enough so they won't be knocked down in the process of taking you to the ground. They also understand that boxing is a very very small part of what they need, because the rely in the ground fighting techniques to finish the opponent. What do Gong Fu guys do ? Exactly what they shouldn't. Instead of training what they are supposed to, Gong Fu, they decide that they have to divide their time between Gong Fu and BJJ or wrestling. They should do what BJJ fighters do. Train a lot in what their are supposed to be specialists ( Gong Fu ) and have a minimum knowledge about ground fighting, so that in the case they go to the ground, they will no be finished. So what happens today is that grapplers are extremely good in what they do ( specialists ) and have a minimum knowledge of the standing game ( a lot of people is doing crosstraining and they are very good standing and on the ground, but the best fighters are still the specialists ). At the other hand, Gong Fu fighters are not so good standing and are also not so good on the ground. Some might even argue that " I train only Gong Fu and I still don't feel safe! ". Well my friend, the question is: what kind of Gong Fu are you training? If it is the " kick boxing " kind of Gong Fu, you will never feel safe anyway. For this is only sport. Kick boxing is ok, but don't expect do beat a man like Rickson Gracie with that. You need a real martial art. You need Xing Yi Quan.

    5 - Mixed martial arts are the best - Nothing, nothing is better than specialization. When people have only part of a knowledge, something incomplete, they have to look out for other sources of knowledge.Imagine you have a half filled glass of water (your Gong Fu) but you have to fill the glass up. The problem is that you don;t have water anymore (you have a limited knowledge about the Gong Fu principles). In this case you have to find out other liquids to fill the glass up. You have a little bit of orange juice (grappling) and you have a bit of, say tequila (kick boxing). At the end, the glass is filled up, but the truth is that you have only a bit of everything. So as a fighter, you are not very good in grappling, not very good in kick boxing and not very good at Gong Fu. You have a bit of everything and at the same time you have nothing.

    It's true that many BJJ are now going a bit deep into boxing and Thai boxing, but take a look at the best guys ever : Rickson Gracie, Helio Gracie, Carlson Gracie, and Rolls Gracie; they are or were absolute specialist in BJJ. How about the famous Che Yi Zhai, Guo Yun Sheng, Wang Xiang Zhai ? Ok. Tell this guys they should mix a lot of martial arts together. Guys that never lost a single fight after they were well trained.

    The objective of this article is not to teach any Xing Yi Quan techniques, or teach you how to handle a grappler. This things can't be learn through the Net. For this you need a good teacher that really understands the principle of XY. What I do want to do, is to clarify all these myths that were created around the grappling arts. If you learn Xing Yi from a good teacher, you have all the conditions to defeat a grappler. The problem right know is that since 1920's BJJ was being perfected and focusing itself in street fight efficiency, while Chinese Gong Fu, as we saw, was being modified into a kind of beautiful dance.

    I want to add here that the attitude of some Chinese masters adds a lot to the Gong Fu world's situation today. But this is a subject for another article, the one entitled "Did Chinese martial arts missed a bit of reality over the years." ... coming soon ...

    I think that this is quite an interesting article - what are your thoughts.

    Cheers
    chris

  • #2
    Chris:

    Your focus seems to be on specialization, and that's something I don't agree with. I like your reference to "the dance" of some martial arts. If I remove the dance aspects of a martial art, and I remove those maneuvers that are simply duplicates of moves I've learned already, I'm left with a lot more time to learn techniques. If I let go of the idea that I must learn one "style," and I instead learn a group of techniques and how to use them togethor I am much more efficient. If I'm more efficient in learning to fight, I learn to fight in multiple ranges. This way, I don't leave any huge holes in my style that can exploited by anyone else. The specialist, however has weaknesses that I will try to exploit. I'll try to take the Tae Kwon Do fighter to the ground, I'll attack the boxer's legs, and I'll try to stay long range on a grappler.

    Comment


    • #3
      ...

      How well could Bruce Lee grapple? Would it be safer to study a style for say, ten years, THEN start doing a different style?

      Later...

      Comment


      • #4
        Your focus seems to be on specialization, and that's something I don't agree with.
        extract:

        It's true that many BJJ are now going a bit deep into boxing and Thai boxing, but take a look at the best guys ever : Rickson Gracie, Helio Gracie, Carlson Gracie, and Rolls Gracie; they are or were absolute specialist in BJJ. How about the famous Che Yi Zhai, Guo Yun Sheng, Wang Xiang Zhai ? Ok. Tell this guys they should mix a lot of martial arts together. Guys that never lost a single fight after they were well trained.

        and

        You have to know the concepts. Concepts work in any situation; they work standing or on the ground. A very good example is about how to defend a punch. You have to look deep in to the movement (the punch) and understand that before being a punch, it's a straight force. So if you learn how to defend straight force attacks, and not only a punch, you can defend (using the same movement) a punch, a frontal kick, a side kick, a wrestlers double leg or a BJJ "baiana," for all these movements are in fact straight forces in motion. All good Xing Yi fighters know this.

        I think this addresses what you are saying. I did not write this article but do totally agree with what it is saying just for the record.

        I beleive that the teaching methodologies of Hsing I and the three main internal arts teach you principles and the essence of movement in a very different way to many external arts.

        As appossed to trying to perform a defence to every situation you learn concepts that can be applied to any situation. This is part of what bruce lee thought - but it was around many many years before him.

        the three internal arts teach you fighting in all ranges, and although bagua is the only one to practice floor work - the principles from them all can be applied from a grounded position.

        Thus cross training is not necisary.

        Arts such as wing chun, most karate and Judo do seem incomplete. JuJutsu is the closest i can liken internal arts - although more striking may be involved.

        JuJutsu contains Strikes, Grappling and groundwork. As do the internal arts but to a much more intuative and deep degree.

        The main problem people have is the effort required to obtain this high level of proffissiency in internal arts - but hey nothing is easy and Roice and the Gracies train a HUGE amount!

        cheers
        Chris
        Last edited by chris davis 200; 04-30-2003, 10:44 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          If I let go of the idea that I must learn one "style," and I instead learn a group of techniques and how to use them togethor I am much more efficient.
          But if you let go of trying to learn 'techniques' and learn concepts and principles then you would be even more efficient.

          Comment


          • #6
            its true that there are a lot of myths created by things like BJJ
            not all fights end on the ground

            specialising gives you some big advantages (i can beat this guy easily on the ground) but at the same time it gives you some big disadvantages (if it doesnt go to ground then this guy can beat me easily standing)

            perhaps it all depends on how you use your specialisation/generalisation

            we shouldnt think in terms of styles

            styles are just a cluster of techniques wrapped together and given a collective name and attatched to a philosophy. dont master styles, master techniques

            example: instead of learning muay thai, tae kwon do and judo. ive learned punches, kicks and throws

            full list of techniques: jab,cross,hook,uppercut,low hook, low cross, low thai roundhouse, mid thai roundhous, right elbow, teep push kick, knee strike, thai clinch with knees, front leg side kick, ogoshi, seonagi, osoto gari, break fall

            i didnt learn three styles i learnt 17 techniques. it doesnt really matter where they come from, only that they work for me

            if i take up BJJ (which id like) i wouldnt do it to master the style, id do it to get some more techniques.

            most of my techniques from taekwondo didnt work so ive abandoned them

            well ive made my point several times

            Comment


            • #7
              5 - Mixed martial arts are the best -

              Nothing, nothing is better than specialization.

              When people have only part of a knowledge, something incomplete, they have to look out for other sources of knowledge.

              Imagine you have a half filled glass of water (your Gong Fu) but you have to fill the glass up. The problem is that you don;t have water anymore (you have a limited knowledge about the Gong Fu principles). In this case you have to find out other liquids to fill the glass up. You have a little bit of orange juice (grappling) and you have a bit of, say tequila (kick boxing).

              At the end, the glass is filled up, but the truth is that you have only a bit of everything.

              So as a fighter, you are not VERY good in grappling, not VERY good in kick boxing and not VERY good at Gong Fu. You have a bit of everything and at the same time you have nothing.

              It's true that many BJJ are now going a bit deep into boxing and Thai boxing, but take a look at the best guys ever : Rickson Gracie, Helio Gracie, Carlson Gracie, and Rolls Gracie; they are or were absolute specialist in BJJ. How about the famous Che Yi Zhai, Guo Yun Sheng, Wang Xiang Zhai ? Ok. Tell this guys they should mix a lot of martial arts together. Guys that never lost a single fight after they were well trained.

              What are ytour thoughts on this then?

              How were these masters able to defeat everyone they faced if they didnt cross train? cross training is only needed if you have not mastered the art. These had mastered their art and therfor did not need to cross train.

              Do you see my point -

              What are your thoughts?

              Comment


              • #8
                as i said techniques are what matters if you train in just one pool of techniques (a style) then there are techniques from other pools which your not getting a chance to learn. also if youve never been to another pool how do you know that yours is the best (the guy who told you it so has spent his whole life in this pool and hasnt left it either)

                on the other hand if you spend your life just jumping from pool to pool, diving in, grabbing anything that looks good then diving out again then its just as bad, your not staying in one pool long enough to see everything

                find a balance, the amount of time you personaly need to stay in a pool to see everything there

                go into a pool, stay long enough to see all the techniques there, get some good techniques that work for you then leave and go to another pool

                if your running out of room for techniques then either stop swimming or forget a few of the least good techniques and continue

                repeat

                Comment


                • #9
                  Chris:

                  I do agree with you that concepts are more important than style. I must disagree again, however, that this idea of specialization will make one a better fighter. You mentioned Bruce Lee, so I do want to use him as an example. Bruce Lee focused on being able to defeat an opponent in multiple ranges. He did indeed come up with several concepts that are important regardless of one's style (faking a strike or movement to force your opponent to open up his defence comes to mind). However, if you read the material that Bruce Lee has created, he studied many arts so that he could draw from them what was useful, and discard the rest. He did indeed study grappling (and I believe that I've read that he was fairly good at it). Here's a fantastic concept, and is in fact the core philosophy of my trainer: fight to your opponent's weakness. If you specialize in a stand up fighting style, and you believe that those principles will still apply when you are fighting a true grappler, I'm sorry to say that I believe you are mistaken. I've seen a lot of great Muay Thai fighters lose to grapplers, and I've seen a lot of grapplers never even try to protect their faces in an NHB fight. The specialists that I've seen fight end up losing quickly.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    i think chris stated that most internal arts are not based on technique.......so your not realy "missing out" on techniques from other styles, or losing the ground game, or stand up game. It encompases everything. Also there are no "best" techniques in my opinion, only real techniques, or ones which a person is able to apply. If a technique works its has been succesfull, its like saying whats the best Bigmac out there.....well they are all bigmacs........chose any, it wont matter.


                    As far as bruce lee, he hardly had enough time to "master" his first art, not even close i would say, he did just what Chris said, used other things to fill the glass........and he was not by any stretch of the imagination an undefeated fighter. Bruce allowed people to bypass there dancing arts that where around at the time, by using only the techniques that he felt where valuable. Alot, if not all of what bruce lee was saying has been around long before he was born. He was good at showing the succesfull concepts of other arts.....why does everyone quote bruce lee anyway? lol.

                    If you train real, if you have a good teacher who is an accual "master" of his art, then there is no need to crosstrain, all you need to do is train allot and train hard. Mindset is important to.

                    when chris says specializing he doesn't mean "stand up game" or "my specialty is ground fighting" he means working hard at one art, and art that covers all the basis....

                    specializing in one thing such as "striking" is not a good thing for a well rounded fighter....it just limits you.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Since national exposure of many “No-Hards-Barred” competitions, many people have come to the conclusion that grappling arts, primarily BJJ, are superior to striking. Like Chris Davis, I believe it’s a naive assumption based on misunderstanding. If anything, the UFC and other NHB contests have proved that striking artists were playing the grapplers game and lacked the understanding to keep their game plan intact.

                      A grappler’s plan is to break his opponent down into his comfort zone — on the ground. Likewise, a striker wants to keep his opponent within striking range. A striker who tries to accommodate his weaknesses on the ground by learning BJJ may do well against a novice on the streets, but his grappling abilities will not necessarily save him against a skilled grappler. The REAL problem is not that he cannot grapple, but rather that he cannot understand how to counter a grappler with strikes and mobility.

                      Similarly, a grappler who cannot get close to a boxer and takes up boxing is not automatically granted a permit to get inside on his opponent. Rather, the grappler must try to understand “why he cannot get inside,” and “how to get inside...”

                      This is by no means a dismissal of Mixed Martial Arts... Some people, like myself, have benefitted from learning various combat arts. Learning other techniques helps you understand them and perhaps counter them. However, one should strive to distinguish what is really the core of their strength and develop that to the utmost. Few people are all-around great fighters that can learn all arts and master each one sufficiently.

                      I will say that there are as many useless techniques out there as there are good techniques. Even within such great arts as BJJ, you will find flaws for nothing is perfect. Consider that at the height of his skill, Helio Gracie was beaten by Judo Great Kimura in the World Championships. Does this mean Judo is the ultimate art? Certainly not. Neither does it imply that BJJ is not a good system — It is probably one of the best to come around in a long time. But at the end of the day, it all depends on what you want to do with your martial art.

                      “... Martial arts is honestly expressing yourself” — Bruce Lee

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Chris,
                        I know we're going to be at odds on this one, so I'll keep this short. If specialization is the height of skill, then why do specialists lose? Specialization only works when you have something that is completely alien to the other guy. Helio, Royce, etc., they won because they had a weapon that nobody knew how to defend against--grappling. Once people started to understand their game, the Gracie family began to lose. Inferior specialists (a.k.a. broad base martial artists) were beating the Gracies because they kept them out of their comfort zone by learning just enough to prevent a loss on the ground. Nowadays, one range doesn't work. I agree with you that one needs a solid base in which much or most of their skill resides, but rounding one's self out does not hurt. Ever. That is a flawed concept. By your reasoning, a wrestler--a specialist at taking down and not being taken down--should never go to the ground because he understands how to avoid the double leg and other popular takedowns. Just because you understand something doesn't mean it can't work against you. As a result, your "you don't need to know how to groundfight" argument is extremely flawed. The same would go for a pure groundfighter believeing the reverse of striking.

                        Anybody can be taken to the ground. Anybody can stay on their feet. A poor striker can beat a good one if he gets lucky, and a good striker will beat on a poor striker more often than not. A Xing Yi Quan fighter can/will lose to a boxer, and a boxer can/will lose to a Xing Yi Quan fighter. Let's not go overboard here pimping our martial art.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          why does everyone quote bruce lee anyway? lol.
                          Because the man was a martial genius and he accomplished more in his 30+ years than most of us will accomplish in our entire lives. That's why. No joke. I don't think you, as an 18 year old with some eastern swordplay and a few months of Systema (not an insult, just a point), are really in any position to criticize him.

                          when chris says specializing he doesn't mean "stand up game" or "my specialty is ground fighting" he means working hard at one art, and art that covers all the basis....
                          How many arts cover all the bases, and if one did, wouldn't you be learning 'groundfighting' or 'striking?' What if your art is boxing, or Muay Thai, or wrestling, or Karate, or Wing Chun? These arts address only standup or groundfighting ranges, not both. Would mastering one of these not be considered specialization? Or do only Internal Chinese Arts fall gain that dubious distinction? William Cheung (Wing Chun) was a master of his art--a 'specialist' even--and he was taken to the ground by a student with a mere five years experience (Emin Boztepe). They proceeded to have a slapping match. Where was all his incredible skill that specialization should have granted him? Where do you think the creators of 'complete' arts drew thier principles and techniques from? They didn't pull them out of their asses? They drew on various arts and disciplines.

                          There are more holes in this argument than I care to count.

                          Also there are no "best" techniques in my opinion, only real techniques, or ones which a person is able to apply.
                          What I can do and what you can do may be very different. What Ajarn Chai can do and what I can do is also going to be quite different. What is applicable for me may be a predetermined failure for you and vice versa.

                          I can't even go on arguing this. It's silly.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            ...

                            The form of Karate I study has grappling in it, but leans more towards striking.

                            Later...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If specialization is the height of skill, then why do specialists lose? Specialization only works when you have something that is completely alien to the other guy.
                              They dont if they have mastered an art which takes into account all ranges of combat.

                              By specialist - i mean someone that has studied an art like Hsing I Chuan. This art is not a grppling art - It is not a striking art. To specialise in striking OR grppling would be stupid - this is not what i ment.

                              What i did mean is that if you just hop from art to art picking up what YOU think is useful you will have a far less chance of victory over someone that I highly trainined in a complete system containing all ranges of combat.

                              How many arts cover all the bases, and if one did, wouldn't you be learning 'groundfighting' or 'striking?'
                              You dont learn one or the other - you learn principles of force vectors, how to defeat this force with less force, how to apply force from all ranges and how to overcome the exerssion of force.

                              Look at the above - this includes - Grappling - standing and grounded - Throwing - takedowns - locking - striking with any body weapon etc etc .

                              Why would you need to croiss train if you understand force vectors involved in ANY fighting technique?

                              What if your art is boxing, or Muay Thai, or wrestling, or Karate, or Wing Chun? These arts address only standup or groundfighting ranges, not both. Would mastering one of these not be considered specialization?
                              It would be specialisation from one point of view but not from the one i am talking about.

                              William Cheung (Wing Chun) was a master of his art--a 'specialist' even--and he was taken to the ground by a student with a mere five years experience (Emin Boztepe). They proceeded to have a slapping match. Where was all his incredible skill that specialization should have granted him?
                              This is the flaw wing chun - It SPECIALISES in stand up fighting.

                              Again this is not what i mean by specialisation.

                              Where do you think the creators of 'complete' arts drew thier principles and techniques from? They didn't pull them out of their asses? They drew on various arts and disciplines.
                              But did not understand them as deeply as the people training in those martial arts - as a result Every one of the techniques that they know may only be 50% as effecient.

                              I can't even go on arguing this. It's silly.
                              If i were saying what you think im saying then yes it would be silly. But im not.

                              I didnt write that article - Just agreed with everything in it.

                              Good descussion topic anyways!!

                              Cheers
                              Chris

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X