Tweet
---Eazy-E
"I just read an interview with GW Bush and he said that he didnt believe in Evolution."
"I know that he isnt the brightest bulb in the house, but not believing in Evolution!?"
"Can he really be this stuiped and narrow minded?!"
"But the creationism people usually get dogmatic about their beliefs and insist that people didnt evolve from lower animal species."
Most creationists would like to discuss the matter in a constructive manner, but the evolutionists "usually get dogmatic and insist" that people did evolve from lower animal species. They often make insulting statements such as "I know that he isnt the brightest bulb in the house, but not believing in Evolution!?" or "Can he really be this stuiped and narrow minded?!"
Exactly what specific details of George W. Bush’s statements regarding the topic of Creationism, other than the fact that he believes in it, led you to criticize his intelligence.
---Ronin
"Evolution is so confirmed by scientific evidence that debating it is almost pointless. It is like debating whether the Earth is round (it is), or whether the Earth goes around the Sun instead of the reverse (it does)."
Evolution is not "so confirmed by scientific evidence". To date, there has not been a single documented example of one species "evolving" into another. It is not "like debating whether the Earth is round" or "whether the Earth goes around the Sun". It can easily be demonstrated through direct observation that the earth is round and orbits the sun. Evolution, however, is merely non-falsifiable, wild speculation based on insufficient fossil remains and faulty dating methods. It, unlike the facts you compared it to, has never been demonstrated by means of direct observation.
"I just read an interview with GW Bush and he said that he didnt believe in Evolution."
"I know that he isnt the brightest bulb in the house, but not believing in Evolution!?"
"Can he really be this stuiped and narrow minded?!"
"But the creationism people usually get dogmatic about their beliefs and insist that people didnt evolve from lower animal species."
Most creationists would like to discuss the matter in a constructive manner, but the evolutionists "usually get dogmatic and insist" that people did evolve from lower animal species. They often make insulting statements such as "I know that he isnt the brightest bulb in the house, but not believing in Evolution!?" or "Can he really be this stuiped and narrow minded?!"
Exactly what specific details of George W. Bush’s statements regarding the topic of Creationism, other than the fact that he believes in it, led you to criticize his intelligence.
---Ronin
"Evolution is so confirmed by scientific evidence that debating it is almost pointless. It is like debating whether the Earth is round (it is), or whether the Earth goes around the Sun instead of the reverse (it does)."
Evolution is not "so confirmed by scientific evidence". To date, there has not been a single documented example of one species "evolving" into another. It is not "like debating whether the Earth is round" or "whether the Earth goes around the Sun". It can easily be demonstrated through direct observation that the earth is round and orbits the sun. Evolution, however, is merely non-falsifiable, wild speculation based on insufficient fossil remains and faulty dating methods. It, unlike the facts you compared it to, has never been demonstrated by means of direct observation.
Comment