Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anti-Grappling

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by pUke View Post
    But I guess this is your attempt to shoot up a flare and call for help by bringing him up. Hehehe ... pathetic.


    I see. That's interesting. Have you known me to call for help in the past?

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by pUke View Post
    Actually, Mike created that topic to hear what I had to say as the title read "Open Invite Uke". Its funny how you stayed away from that topic.


    Yes, because at the very outset of that thread he pointed out that the discussion was intended to be between the two of you. I just popped in when the damn thing had already gone to hell because of your stupidity.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Well, that was exactly what we all knew was coming...

    ...

    ...

    I'd say this is more effort than an actual reply to his crap is worth, Nice Job Uke.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uke
    replied
    Originally posted by jubaji View Post
    Oh yeah, that's what those 100's of pages of bitching at Mike were all about - agreeing to disagree...
    Actually, Mike created that topic to hear what I had to say as the title read "Open Invite Uke". Its funny how you stayed away from that topic besides one-liners. You knew if you had opened your mouth about anything except for insults your chance to be exposed would have been up next. But I guess this is your attempt to shoot up a flare and call for help by bringing him up. Hehehe ... pathetic.

    No one asks you anything because you're a waste of time and posting space. That's why you have to interject your babbling everywhere. If you held your breath waiting for someone to ask your opinion about something you'd have been dead a looong time ago, Bunny.

    Let's look at what responses you could muster and see the depth of your technical knowledge.

    Originally posted by jubaji
    Nothing is free, so you can drop that little bit of stupidity to start with.
    Originally posted by jubaji
    Oh my, aren't we clever? I covered this in a previous post, miss. You will beg and cajole for any personal information that you can then play school-girl games with. That pathetic ploy has been exposed already. Pay attention, idiot.
    Originally posted by jubaji
    You sure about that, miss?
    Originally posted by jubaji
    Actually, all those things have been discussed about a million times. Did you fall asleep or something, moron?
    Originally posted by jubaji
    Try to keep up, boy.
    Originally posted by jubaji
    Oh they exist, they are called grapplers.
    Originally posted by jubaji
    Is your new slogan (patent pending) now 'ANTI-GROUND GRAPPLING'?

    Bad news, you'll still need to modify the t-shirts.
    Originally posted by jubaji
    That would depend on the circumstances not, as in your case, on what slogan was printed on my t-shirt.
    Jubaji, you'll go out of your way to talk about kimchi, sake and other crap but if someone puts you on the spot about discussing martial arts, self defense or urban combatives you start sweating like a hooker in church and resort to insults and any other means that you can use to get out of being embarrassed for what you don't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by Uke View Post
    why not explain why grapplers are no longer the dominant force in your precious NHB tournaments?



    Grappling is every bit as much an essential element of NHB competitions (although they are not as 'precious' to me as you seem to think, asswipe). Competitors are doing better with and in the grappling range because for a long time now it has been very obvious that it is essential to train that range seriously and realistically. Serious competitors have for a long time now devoted a great amount of time and energy to learning, training, and testing their grappling skills because it is so obvious that they need them.

    I'm sorry that this reality is the exact opposite of what your weak spineless dream hoped it would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by Uke View Post
    tell us here what standing grappling techniques you'd use in a street altercation!

    That would depend on the circumstances not, as in your case, on what slogan was printed on my t-shirt.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by Uke View Post

    2)Tell us why you are fixated on including ALL grappling into a topic about GROUND GRAPPLING?
    Is your new slogan (patent pending) now 'ANTI-GROUND GRAPPLING'?

    Bad news, you'll still need to modify the t-shirts.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by pUke View Post
    1)Discuss how men who use what they know to get up if in the event they are taken down CAN'T EXIST.




    Oh they exist, they are called grapplers.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by Uke View Post
    How about mentioning some techniques that anti-grappling wouldn't work against? Let's discuss that.


    You fail logic again. It doesn't exist, therefore there any further 'technical analysis' would also be illusion.



    Try to keep up, boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    the situation dictates the response, not your free t-shirt

    Originally posted by Uke View Post
    Have you been able to discuss why its total stupidity to clinch with a man in the street if you have no idea whether he's armed or not? Have you been able to refute the fact that most self defense situations do not go to the ground? Have you presented any facts to support using going to the ground as a means of offense? Have you presented an argument as to why 'anti-grappling' does NOT exist?



    Actually, all those things have been discussed about a million times. Did you fall asleep or something, moron?

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by Uke View Post

    You don't even have to discuss about your own personal training to be able to competently discuss general technique, concepts and training ... something you've NEVER done. Something you can't do.


    You sure about that, miss?

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by pUke View Post
    At least you admit that you never speak about training or your experience. Its because you have none!


    Oh my, aren't we clever? I covered this in a previous post, miss. You will beg and cajole for any personal information that you can then play school-girl games with. That pathetic ploy has been exposed already. Pay attention, idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by Uke View Post
    Everyone here but you knows that what we're discussing is free. ]
    Nothing is free, so you can drop that little bit of stupidity to start with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uke
    replied
    Originally posted by jubaji View Post
    the very few times that I have talked about my personal training and experiences...
    At least you admit that you never speak about training or your experience. Its because you have none! Isn't that obvious after 6,000 posts which have nothing to do with martial arts?

    You don't even have to discuss about your own personal training to be able to competently discuss general technique, concepts and training ... something you've NEVER done. Something you can't do.

    If you had something of value to say, you'd have said it by now. Have you refuted any one technique? Have you been able to discuss why its total stupidity to clinch with a man in the street if you have no idea whether he's armed or not? Have you been able to refute the fact that most self defense situations do not go to the ground? Have you presented any facts to support using going to the ground as a means of offense? Have you presented an argument as to why the anti-grappling movement supposedly does NOT exist?

    How about mentioning some techniques that anti-grappling wouldn't work against? Let's discuss that. As a matter of fact, let's discuss ANY technique. You won't because you know that I'd expose and embarrass you for the loud mouth know-nothing that you are.

    How about it?

    1)Discuss technique ... in detail ... and how the idea that men who focus on deterring ground grappling attempts and use what they know to get up if in the event they are taken down CAN'T EXIST. Show the forum what you know.

    2)Tell us why you are fixated on including ALL grappling into a topic about GROUND GRAPPLING? Better yet, tell us here what standing grappling techniques you'd use in a street altercation period!

    3)Tell us what weapon disarms you'd use as a grappler. If you feel that its safe enough to shoot in on a guy in a real fight, you must have some grappling techniques to deal with a blade, right? Cause there's no way for you to know if he's armed. Tell us about it, jubaji!!!

    4)If you feel that the only way to beat a grappler is to become a grappler, then why not explain why grapplers are no longer the dominant force in your precious NHB tournaments? NHB fighters have been learning, like anti-grappling advocates, to practice enough newaza defense and counter-striking to effectively remain successful strikers. They learned enough to get up and get away. They didn't have to enroll in Gracie jujitsu or greco-roman wrestling for years.

    5)Tell us why girls like you would focus on learning a range that wasn't created for the streets or weapons, so that you could later come to SD forums like this one to pretend like you know something about it?

    6)If you're going to be so pathetic that all you can come up with is "well it might be a bit costly", then save yourself the embarrassment. Everyone here but you knows that what we're discussing is free. Jubaji just wants to discredit anything that makes his "ground n' slow dance" look less legitimate as combat.

    So bring it, Bunny.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    fuckin' hypocrite/liar

    Originally posted by pUke View Post
    There have been plenty of people who have disagreed with me, and I have always been fine to agree to disagree ...
    Oh yeah, that's what those 100's of pages of bitching at Mike were all about - agreeing to disagree...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X