Which is most of the time a pretty good idea, but when exactly does it get to that level? Sure, if someone is trying to kill you and you have the means to kill them that seems like a reasonable decision. But what about situations that are not necessarily life or death?
Now I know some yahoo is gonna pipe in with the "I don't go to bad places" or "I use awareness" bromides, but if you are in a bad situation but not necessarily one where it is clear you are in a life and death struggle, do you say fuckit, and start cutting? When does it go to that level?
Uncle Earl is getting drunk and belligerent at Cousin Ophelia's wedding; do you empty his entrails onto the faux-wood dance floor while the in-laws do the Hokey-Pokey?
Charlie the ex HS football star is balding and pumping gas in the same town he never left and is pissed about it all on Saturday night in the bar; do you shoot him in the head while the locals sip their beers?
Biff and Todd got rejected in their bid for Phi Phi Phi because their sweater-vests weren't the right color and after stealing their stock-broker parents' coke and downing 8 wine coolers they run into you at the ATM where they've gone to take out another grand. You know they are gonna start shit; do you kill Biff and Todd?
When its life or death, the choice is obvious. But what about when its probably not, but still likely to be a violent situation? Where's the line? Its an important line.
Now, if its life or death and you aren't ready for that, that's a problem. But when its probably not life or death but you make it so, you've definately got a problem. Obviously you want to err on the side of keeping your ass alive, but its not likely to be completely clear all the time. Some A-holes will read this and say it is and make some uselessly categorical comments, but I'd like to hear what the real people think.
Just something to think about.
Now I know some yahoo is gonna pipe in with the "I don't go to bad places" or "I use awareness" bromides, but if you are in a bad situation but not necessarily one where it is clear you are in a life and death struggle, do you say fuckit, and start cutting? When does it go to that level?
Uncle Earl is getting drunk and belligerent at Cousin Ophelia's wedding; do you empty his entrails onto the faux-wood dance floor while the in-laws do the Hokey-Pokey?
Charlie the ex HS football star is balding and pumping gas in the same town he never left and is pissed about it all on Saturday night in the bar; do you shoot him in the head while the locals sip their beers?
Biff and Todd got rejected in their bid for Phi Phi Phi because their sweater-vests weren't the right color and after stealing their stock-broker parents' coke and downing 8 wine coolers they run into you at the ATM where they've gone to take out another grand. You know they are gonna start shit; do you kill Biff and Todd?
When its life or death, the choice is obvious. But what about when its probably not, but still likely to be a violent situation? Where's the line? Its an important line.
Now, if its life or death and you aren't ready for that, that's a problem. But when its probably not life or death but you make it so, you've definately got a problem. Obviously you want to err on the side of keeping your ass alive, but its not likely to be completely clear all the time. Some A-holes will read this and say it is and make some uselessly categorical comments, but I'd like to hear what the real people think.
Just something to think about.
Comment