Why does Jet Li never take his shirt off in any off his movies? Bruce practically LIVED half naked in his films. Why does Jet Li have to be so freaking wak and humble and not show off the fact that he's like 80 times more ripped than bruce or jackie?
							
						
					Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Jet Li, the never shirtless man
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 He does take his top off during films, i can't remember the bloody name of the film though grrr its so long since i see it, he helps a prostitute i THINK, wins using acupuncture strikes and makes the boss guy bleed. He also has his top off in the first Shaolin temple film....whens he's still a teenager, he does a form i beleive. Sorry, long day, tired, can't remember much.....
 
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 man u must really be in love with jet li to start an entire thread talking about how u wish he would wear less clothing in his movies. if u wanna see movies with men wearing alot less clothing then u need to go rent some porno flicks bro, not martial arts movies. and since when is humble considered being wack? i think starting threads complaining about how u wish u could look at jet li's ripped body more is pretty wack.Originally posted by EyegougeWhy does Jet Li never take his shirt off in any off his movies? Bruce practically LIVED half naked in his films. Why does Jet Li have to be so freaking wak and humble and not show off the fact that he's like 80 times more ripped than bruce or jackie?
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Premiere Member- Sep 2005
- 504
 
- 
				
					[" And although we may do our best to avoid trouble, sometimes trouble insists on finding us. When that happens......when the time for talk is over, warriors act. They flip the switch and act decisively - ruthlessly if necessary - to preserve and defend the things that they hold dear."
 Michael D. Janiich Why being a warrior starts with accepting the limitations of peace.
 



 
							
						
Comment