Originally posted by hanuman
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wing Chun or Shaolin?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by hanumanwing chun isnt bad at all, its a great art, looks impressive but in my personal experience, it was awful i actually felt bad for the guys, we were having a discussion one day at my old job and i over heard these two guys talkin about how great wing chun is and new techniques they learned, and what not, so i was interested and was like can u show me something? and boy were those punches FAST! so i was like cool. do you guys wanna spar? and they looked at each other and laughed. i mean seriously laughed and put me down with jokes. so i was like fine whatever and was about to walk away when they were like fine we warned you. so i got anxious and was like cool lets go. so anyway the first guy came flailing at me with what i guess u call chain punching? and i just moved a bit to the side, clinched him and elbowed, HUGE CUT, second guy saw and was pissed as hell and screamin he was gonna kill me and he came flying at me too with some crazy manuver and i just right hooked him. dude's jaw broke. and im not even huge at all. but this guy stood up to me with his chin out. i couldnt resist. anyway, in my personal experience wing chun was not useful and only got me fired from a job.and they were also saying how they knew soo many techniques and how they could counter one punch with like a bajillion different other techniques. the 2nd guy must have launched like 90 techniques before he even got close to me, i couldnt understand why he did that. anyway i just used 3 manuvers and beat two guys who grew up learning wing chun while i trained in muay thai for like 4 months.
Comment
-
Or, of course, they were training in a second rate art.
A good friend of mine regular writes for Black Belt magazine. Back in the day he regularly took part in "Animal Day" type training. He had a dedicated Wing Chun guy join. This guy refused to learn any of the more functional moves they trained there, as he preferred to rely on his WC to get him through.
He got pasted, time and time again. No exceptions. He stopped going.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thai BriOr, of course, they were training in a second rate art.
A good friend of mine regular writes for Black Belt magazine. Back in the day he regularly took part in "Animal Day" type training. He had a dedicated Wing Chun guy join. This guy refused to learn any of the more functional moves they trained there, as he preferred to rely on his WC to get him through.
He got pasted, time and time again. No exceptions. He stopped going.....
Comment
-
hey Bri ever crossed paths with Duncan Leung or any of his students? Duncan teaches WC like no one else i have ever seen IE: its effective
Duncan has moved back to China, he left a Hop Gar school he crosstrained with in his old school location with several of his top instructors in charge...i used to leave class with Paul Vunak and race to Duncans class back in the late 80's many SF types were in his classes (some piled in the car from VU's) and made use of his teachings. However the typical WC school tends to be rather unimpressive, i agree.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thai BriCare too back that up with any verifiable accounts of genuine WC fighting prowess?
Comment
-
Trainging methods are more important than styles. After all, there are only certain ways that we can throw our limbs about, so this strike or that kick in one style isn't all that dissimilar to the same moves in another.
It is precisely the training methods that count.
So, which arts do you think are best? The ones who hit bags whilst on the move? Who hit each other whilst wearing protective equipment? Who train their bodies through arduous physical exercises?
Or the ones who barely break into a sweat, wiggling their arms about in thin air?
Comment
Comment