Convinced?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KungFu Weaponry compare to Non-KungFu Weapons
Collapse
X
-
lol.
I believe Chinese weapons would have been superior, after all they had GUNS
But then of course, it's more dependent on the wielder. Early firearms were inferior to bows because of inacuracy and loading times.
However, the Chinese also had bombs, which are infinitely superior to all martial arts weapons
Comment
-
Registered User
- Feb 2003
- 2088
-
The law of tyranny:
1. Any power that can be abused will be abused
2. Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it.
3. If people don't resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail.
Welcome to the Socialist States of Amerika . Coming soon Jan 20th 2009!
Originally posted by verclol.
I believe Chinese weapons would have been superior, after all they had GUNS
But then of course, it's more dependent on the wielder. Early firearms were inferior to bows because of inacuracy and loading times.
However, the Chinese also had bombs, which are infinitely superior to all martial arts weapons
Comment
-
Originally posted by verclol.
I believe Chinese weapons would have been superior, after all they had GUNS
But then of course, it's more dependent on the wielder. Early firearms were inferior to bows because of inacuracy and loading times.
However, the Chinese also had bombs, which are infinitely superior to all martial arts weapons
HAW HAW HAW HAW
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dim Wit MocThe comments on club or sword vs .45 ACP (mine is a Springfield Armory)reminds me of a scene from an Indiana Jones movie. The guy with the sword put on quite a twirling exhibition before Indiana put a chi bullet in him.
People, please get off your mystical weapon fantasies. Weapons are deadly, period. But guns are more deadly.
Stop promoting chi sword technique superiority over guns. Close quarters is a different story. Anything else - firearms have superiority.
This is gettin' old.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom YumThank you!
People, please get off your mystical weapon fantasies. Weapons are deadly, period. But guns are more deadly.
Stop promoting chi sword technique superiority over guns. Close quarters is a different story. Anything else - firearms have superiority.
This is gettin' old.
People, please get off your mystical Non-KungFu martial arts fantasies. Weapons are deadly, period. But guns are more deadly.
KungFu Sword Techniques is superior to a MMA Martial Arts, and other Non-KungFu arts. Close quarters is a different story.
While guns are more superior to Sword.....
Anything else - firearms have superiority......
Convinced???????
Comment
-
Registered User
- Feb 2003
- 2088
-
The law of tyranny:
1. Any power that can be abused will be abused
2. Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it.
3. If people don't resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail.
Welcome to the Socialist States of Amerika . Coming soon Jan 20th 2009!
Originally posted by Dim Wit MocThe comments on club or sword vs .45 ACP (mine is a Springfield Armory)reminds me of a scene from an Indiana Jones movie. The guy with the sword put on quite a twirling exhibition before Indiana put a chi bullet in him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vercI'm sorry, but you guys are wrong.
Bombs, and explosions in general can kill many more people than firearms or martial arts, save a deadly DragonBallZ type chi blast.
all of you are all stupid, me??? i stare something i like - i could sunk a thousands of ships and planes......
Comment
-
Registered User
- Feb 2003
- 2088
-
The law of tyranny:
1. Any power that can be abused will be abused
2. Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it.
3. If people don't resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail.
Welcome to the Socialist States of Amerika . Coming soon Jan 20th 2009!
Originally posted by sherwincGUNS can kill 10 people
while.....
KungFu Sword can kill 1000 people without getting the blade dull
Note:
One of the reasons why Japanese Soldiers carries Katana during World War II
Do you ever think before you post?
Comment
-
Originally posted by darrianationJust how many people do you suppose the Japanese killed with their swords compared to how many they killed with their bombs, artillery, and guns?
Do you ever think before you post?
Whjich it is seeing that Japan never was invaded by China even though the Chinese tried it actually before the introduction of firearms noone managed to invade Japan
The Portugese were allowed to trade, a position that was later taken by the Dutch because they promised not to get involved in Japanese society
Firearms were the decline of the samurai and those were singleshot guns
Comment
-
Originally posted by sherwincKungFu Sword Techniques is superior to a MMA Martial Arts, and other Non-KungFu arts. Close quarters is a different story.
Convinced???????
Alot of these weapons are concealable; kung fu sword isn't.
Comment
Comment